<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch What He Does, Not What He Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyouth</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329945</link>
		<dc:creator>tyouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329945</guid>
		<description>&quot;when Obama gets a request for additional troops, if he doesn’t respond ASAP, he is “diterhing.” If after a time he announces a strategy and begins to not just send but rush troops, then he is not to be trusted.&quot;

ASAP is usually the way to go in matters of life and death.  Dithering and being untrustworthy aren&#039;t mutually exclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;when Obama gets a request for additional troops, if he doesn’t respond ASAP, he is “diterhing.” If after a time he announces a strategy and begins to not just send but rush troops, then he is not to be trusted.&#8221;</p>
<p>ASAP is usually the way to go in matters of life and death.  Dithering and being untrustworthy aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pst314</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329944</link>
		<dc:creator>pst314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329944</guid>
		<description>How can he “commit to victory” when he is so unwilling to speak of victory? (Except when talking about defeating his domestic enemies, anyone to the right of Hubert Humphrey?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can he “commit to victory” when he is so unwilling to speak of victory? (Except when talking about defeating his domestic enemies, anyone to the right of Hubert Humphrey?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike K</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329939</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329939</guid>
		<description>What I fear is the Johnson syndrome in which he said he wouldn&#039;t be the first American president to lose a war but then did everything he could to keep from winning, including telling the North Vietnamese that we did not plan to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I fear is the Johnson syndrome in which he said he wouldn&#8217;t be the first American president to lose a war but then did everything he could to keep from winning, including telling the North Vietnamese that we did not plan to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329931</guid>
		<description>Bullshit. Obama made a big show of reexamining our failed Afghan policy that had been initiated by the failed Bush administration etc etc. As part of this reexamination Obama commissioned Gen. McChrystal&#039;s review in the Spring. McChrystal delivered his report in August. Obama sat on it for months while his surrogates attacked McChrystal in the press and floated trial balloons. Meanwhile no one had a clue what Obama planned, and his inaction suggested that he was going to reverse our policy. Dithering is the nicest way to characterize his behavior.

You are right that Obama wants to get out of Afghanistan, but you are wrong about what the American people want. Of course no one wants us to be there, but reasonable people recognize that there is no good alternative for the time being. If voters wanted to get out now Obama would be getting us out now. It is precisely because Americans don&#039;t want that that Obama is reinforcing our military presence in Afghanistan. The question is whether he will follow through.

BTW, it&#039;s not the &quot;Bush war.&quot; It&#039;s the American war. Americans, including the Congressional Democratic leadership, overwhelmingly supported our invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq. Your memory is conveniently short on this point.

&lt;i&gt;Am I the only one reading this fine blog who feels that this is comendable and am looking to see if his plan works? Or is much easier to sit back, sneer, and put down any and all attempts than are made by a president and party that won big on the national level??&lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t be an ass. I said in the last sentence of my post that I hope that Obama will show resolve and do the right thing. But you won&#039;t acknowledge that I wrote that, because doing so wouldn&#039;t serve your rhetorical purpose of casting yourself as reasonable and me as unreasonable by comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit. Obama made a big show of reexamining our failed Afghan policy that had been initiated by the failed Bush administration etc etc. As part of this reexamination Obama commissioned Gen. McChrystal&#8217;s review in the Spring. McChrystal delivered his report in August. Obama sat on it for months while his surrogates attacked McChrystal in the press and floated trial balloons. Meanwhile no one had a clue what Obama planned, and his inaction suggested that he was going to reverse our policy. Dithering is the nicest way to characterize his behavior.</p>
<p>You are right that Obama wants to get out of Afghanistan, but you are wrong about what the American people want. Of course no one wants us to be there, but reasonable people recognize that there is no good alternative for the time being. If voters wanted to get out now Obama would be getting us out now. It is precisely because Americans don&#8217;t want that that Obama is reinforcing our military presence in Afghanistan. The question is whether he will follow through.</p>
<p>BTW, it&#8217;s not the &#8220;Bush war.&#8221; It&#8217;s the American war. Americans, including the Congressional Democratic leadership, overwhelmingly supported our invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq. Your memory is conveniently short on this point.</p>
<p><i>Am I the only one reading this fine blog who feels that this is comendable and am looking to see if his plan works? Or is much easier to sit back, sneer, and put down any and all attempts than are made by a president and party that won big on the national level??</i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be an ass. I said in the last sentence of my post that I hope that Obama will show resolve and do the right thing. But you won&#8217;t acknowledge that I wrote that, because doing so wouldn&#8217;t serve your rhetorical purpose of casting yourself as reasonable and me as unreasonable by comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack turner</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329928</link>
		<dc:creator>jack turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329928</guid>
		<description>It seems to work like this:
when Obama gets a request for additional troops, if he doesn&#039;t respond ASAP, he is &quot;diterhing.&quot; If after a time he announces a strategy and begins to not just send but rush troops, then he is not to be trusted.
Fact is, Taliban is not Al Qaeda--and no I don&#039;t like them either--and Pakistan is as much of a problem now as is Afghanistan.

Obama wants to get out of Afghanistan. The American people want us out of Afghanistan (note how the GOP carps about our deficit for domestic needs but never for military needs), and we either do a Tough Love and force Afghanistan to stand on their own or we stay there (of course: not you and not me) and Enable the Afghanistan govt and people.

Obama is continuing the Bush war but he has now made it is own. He may decide to get us out after a time, but he seems to want to satisfy two ends: buying time to get Afghanistan ready (as happens in Iraq) do do the job for their own country
and also to get out of that trap.

Am I the only one reading this fine blog who feels that this is comendable and am looking to see if his plan works? Or is much easier to sit back, sneer, and put down any and all attempts than are made by a president and party that won big on the national level??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to work like this:<br />
when Obama gets a request for additional troops, if he doesn&#8217;t respond ASAP, he is &#8220;diterhing.&#8221; If after a time he announces a strategy and begins to not just send but rush troops, then he is not to be trusted.<br />
Fact is, Taliban is not Al Qaeda&#8211;and no I don&#8217;t like them either&#8211;and Pakistan is as much of a problem now as is Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Obama wants to get out of Afghanistan. The American people want us out of Afghanistan (note how the GOP carps about our deficit for domestic needs but never for military needs), and we either do a Tough Love and force Afghanistan to stand on their own or we stay there (of course: not you and not me) and Enable the Afghanistan govt and people.</p>
<p>Obama is continuing the Bush war but he has now made it is own. He may decide to get us out after a time, but he seems to want to satisfy two ends: buying time to get Afghanistan ready (as happens in Iraq) do do the job for their own country<br />
and also to get out of that trap.</p>
<p>Am I the only one reading this fine blog who feels that this is comendable and am looking to see if his plan works? Or is much easier to sit back, sneer, and put down any and all attempts than are made by a president and party that won big on the national level??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329917</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329917</guid>
		<description>Gates is the one to watch. He &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1204/p02s08-usfp.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;has given an interview&lt;/a&gt; comparing Obama&#039;s decision to Bush&#039;s surge, a comparison Obama would never make, and it is reassuring.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;That transition has to occur, I think we can all agree on, and a surge is a surge so it&#039;s a reasonable time frame to achieve the effects that we want to achieve,&quot; he says.&lt;/i&gt;

He also said, although I cannot find a link to those words, that the Iraq surge lasted 14 months before the troop levels began to decline. This is a similar timeline. If Obama begins to back away from the commitment, as I expect him to, Gates may start talking about leaving.

Personally, given the rules of engagement they have, I am in favor of just pulling out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gates is the one to watch. He <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1204/p02s08-usfp.html" rel="nofollow">has given an interview</a> comparing Obama&#8217;s decision to Bush&#8217;s surge, a comparison Obama would never make, and it is reassuring.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;That transition has to occur, I think we can all agree on, and a surge is a surge so it&#8217;s a reasonable time frame to achieve the effects that we want to achieve,&#8221; he says.</i></p>
<p>He also said, although I cannot find a link to those words, that the Iraq surge lasted 14 months before the troop levels began to decline. This is a similar timeline. If Obama begins to back away from the commitment, as I expect him to, Gates may start talking about leaving.</p>
<p>Personally, given the rules of engagement they have, I am in favor of just pulling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david foster</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329916</link>
		<dc:creator>david foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329916</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pressure-222464-track-speech.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Steyn&lt;/a&gt; on Obama&#039;s speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pressure-222464-track-speech.html" rel="nofollow">Mark Steyn</a> on Obama&#8217;s speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329915</guid>
		<description>Maybe he can&#039;t. He probably doesn&#039;t share my premise that the West is in a long war with radical Islam in which victory means the marginalization of radical Islam. In this frame Afghanistan is a theater of battle rather than a war unto itself, and we should expect to maintain an active presence there for many years to come.

He could at least do what he isn&#039;t doing now, namely make decisions faster and show resolve. Instead he&#039;s triangulating: we&#039;re sending more troops but we&#039;re going to start withdrawing them next Wednesday. But who knows, maybe we&#039;ll succeed in marginalizing radical Islam by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he can&#8217;t. He probably doesn&#8217;t share my premise that the West is in a long war with radical Islam in which victory means the marginalization of radical Islam. In this frame Afghanistan is a theater of battle rather than a war unto itself, and we should expect to maintain an active presence there for many years to come.</p>
<p>He could at least do what he isn&#8217;t doing now, namely make decisions faster and show resolve. Instead he&#8217;s triangulating: we&#8217;re sending more troops but we&#8217;re going to start withdrawing them next Wednesday. But who knows, maybe we&#8217;ll succeed in marginalizing radical Islam by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10593.html/comment-page-1#comment-329914</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=10593#comment-329914</guid>
		<description>How can he &quot;commit to victory&quot; when nobody knows what victory would look like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can he &#8220;commit to victory&#8221; when nobody knows what victory would look like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

