Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Battle of Okinawa 65 Years Later — 30 thru 31 May 1945

    Posted by Trent Telenko on May 30th, 2010 (All posts by )

    May 30, 1945

    On Okinawa, American forces reach Shuri, south of the former Japanese positions. Two battalions of US Marines reach the southeast edge of Naha.

    The Japanese withdrawl to the Kiyan Line

    The withdrawal of the 44th independent Mixed Brigade to the Kiyan line, 31 May 1945

    May 31, 1945

    On Okinawa, the US 6th Marine Division (part of US 3rd Amphibious Corps) encounters Japanese rearguards near Hill 46. Japanese forces pull out of Shuri.

    The Shuri Line has fallen!

    The withdrawl of the IJA's 62nd Infantry Division

    Final withdrawal of the 62d Division, 30 May thru 4 June 1945

    Okinawa Campaign Background

    American 10th Army intelligence did not realize this retreat was happening until 30 May and in addition, it did not know where the next line of defense would be. A program of interdictive artillery fire was started, but it did not reach as far south as the Kiyan line.

    Heavy rains and mud plus, rear guard Japanese cave pill-boxes, made a rapid American pursuit impossible.

    Between May 25th and June 4th 1945, the Japanese 32nd Army lost 20,000 of it’s 50,000 remaining troops retreating to the Kiyan Line.

    This compares to the 7,000 the 32nd Army lost in it’s abortive May 4-5th 1945 offensive.

    The loss in Japanese combat power was even worse than those raw numbers indicate. Only one in five of the combat troops present on 01 April were still able to fight. The loss of crew served infantry heavy weapons was worse. Only one-fifth of the original machine guns survived. Japanese hand grenades and mines were now almost exhausted.

    Only one-tenth of the heavier weapons like 50mm mortars, 37mm and 47mm anti-tank guns, 70mm battalion level infantry support guns and 75mm field artillery survived.

    The coming defense of the Kiyan line against American tanks would be compromised, between the shortage of mines and the lack of anti-tank guns. The approaches to and through the Kiyan line were good tank country, and despite killing close to 1/2 the American Sherman tanks in the invasion force, the starting force of Shermans was so large — the two Marine medium tank battalions (45 ea. M4 Sherman), four independent Army medium tank battalions (53 ea. M4 Sherman and 6 ea. M4 (105mm) assault guns) and one armored flame thrower medium tank battalion (54 ea. POA-CWS-H1 Flame thrower Shermans and 3 ea. M4 (105mm) assault guns) — that those left would be unstoppable.

    The only bright spot was half of the IJA 5th Artillery Command’s large field guns were still intact, including sixteen 150-mm howitzers, because were kept in the rear with thus were relatively unscathed.

    However, since this heavy artillery had only 1,000 rounds of ammunition per gun at the start of the campaign. Their remaining combat power was as limited as their ammunition.

    According to Leavenworth Papers Number 18, Thomas M. Huber’s Japan’s Battle of Okinawa, April-June 1945

    The Japanese withdrawal to fresh lines in the south succeeded in part because the Americans did not make an early concerted effort to break through the Shuri shell. On 26 May American aerial observers noted men, artillery, and armor moving south, but they also reported a large column moving north. This latter force was probably the IJA rear-area garrison units that were called up from the Chinen Peninsula to aid in the 25-26 May attacks on Yonabaru. Since the American analysts were not aware of an overall pattern of southerly movement, they concluded that the Japanese were using the bad weather to cover an overdue rotation of reserve and frontline troops.43
    Visibility on 29 May was zero, and air observation was impossible. Nevertheless, by 30 May, because of vacated IJA positions found west of Shuri and other accumulating bits of evidence, U.S. Tenth Army intelligence finally reached a consensus that the Shuri lines were being abandoned. But the Americans did not know where the new lines were and assumed they were about two miles behind the old ones, just enough to straighten out the salients the Americans had built up on the east and west .44
    U.S. Convoy
    American forces elbowed into Shuri on 31 May, completing the reduction of the formidable Shuri line. They realized by this time that they were dealing only with a rear guard. The American force prepared to pursue the Japanese southward on 1 June, but by this time, the 44th IMB, the last IJA unit in the vicinity, had already completed its withdrawal. Moreover, given the sheltered nature of the Japanese defenses, it was impossible for the Americans to move forward safely if even a few Japanese remained in the pillbox caves. Those last few had to be eliminated, and that inevitably took days. The problem remained even after the Shuri line fell, because the IJA 62d Division and the 24th Division’s rear guard both manned intermediate positions between Shuri and the Kiyan area. Even though the IJA screening forces were few, safe and rapid forward pursuit by the Americans was impossible. In the upshot, U.S. Tenth Army units were not aligned and ready to engage the new Kiyan lines until 6 June.45


    One Response to “Battle of Okinawa 65 Years Later — 30 thru 31 May 1945”

    1. Lexington Green Says:

      Too bad they weren’t caught out in the open by naval gunfire. I can only imagine what battlrship main guns would have done to the retreating Japanese out in the open. Imagining anachronistically persistent UAV presence behind the initial Japanese position, which is what an equivalent enemy would face today. On the other hand, Osama bin Laden got away from Tora Bora, despite all our modern “magic tricks”.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.