Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Battle of Okinawa 65 Years Later — 15 June 1945

    Posted by Trent Telenko on June 15th, 2010 (All posts by )

    15 June 1945

    On Okinawa, Marines suffer heavy casualties and are unable to advance on Kunishi Ridge. The US 1st Division, already short of troops, is attached to the US 2nd Marine Division.

    Forces of the US 24th Corps continue operations to eliminate Japanese positions on Mount Yaeju and Mount Yuza.

    Landing Vehicle Tracked (LVT)  on 01 April 1945

    Landing Vehicle Tracked (LVT) on 01 April 1945


    Okinawa Campaign Background –– LVT Attrition

    The USMC, at the beginning of the Okinawa campaign, had used previous island assaults as the base line for provisioning spares and supports for it’s landing vehicle tracked (LVT).

    It was utterly inadequate in the face of the reality of protracted combat on Okinawa:


    At the beginning of the campaign, the 4th and 9th Amphibian Tractor Battalions with a total of 205 LVTs were attached to the 6th Marine Division. Added to those in the 1st and 8th Battalions attached to the 1st Marine Division, the total number of LVTs available to IIIAC was 421. IIIAC AR, chap VII, p. 101. The resupply of spare parts for LVTs was totally inadequate, especially in the case of such vitally needed basic items as tracks, track suspension system parts, front drive assemblies, and transmission parts. The lack of all of these deadlined a good many LVTs and severely limited the amount of support they could have provided during the drive to the south and in the Oroku landing. At the end of the campaign, 75 LVTs had been completely destroyed as a result of enemy action, or, having been badly damaged, they were cannibalized for spare parts. Of the 346 vehicles remaining, 200 were deadlined for lack of spare parts. Ibid., p. 102.

    There were 421 LVT-3 and LVT-4 on 1 April 1945. By the end of the campaign only 146 of that 421 were operational. A number a hair under 35% of the original starting force.

    The logistical implications of those numbers for Operation Olympic in November/December 1945 were daunting.

     

    3 Responses to “Battle of Okinawa 65 Years Later — 15 June 1945”

    1. Don L Says:

      Which reminds me that in the Pacific war; Okinawa, Iwo Jima and perhaps, Wake Island received the most publicity, but few know that the largest invasion in the history of the USA with the most casualties was (no, not D-Day) The Phillipines -Luzon, Leyte etc.

    2. Lexington Green Says:

      How many LVTs did they think they’d need for Olympic? And how many did they think would be destroyed? Was there a ramp-up in factory production for them? How much lead time was required?

      You may be about to tell us this in your next post!

      Was Olympic even do-able?

    3. Trent Telenko Says:

      Lex,

      Multiple 421 by three to get your Operation Olympic number of LVT amphibious tractor numbers.

      Olympic was going to have nine divisions on three beaches. The first four assault waves for each beach — based on the Operation Iceberg template — would be the infantry battalions of two infantry regiments from each from the lead two assault divisions.

      These first four assaults wave would have two LVT tractor battalions, a LVT Amphtank battalion and two M4 Sherman T-6 companies launched from LST, LSM, LSV,and LSD amphibious transports.

      The next 8-to-10 follow up waves would be on LCVP ( troops), LCM (Tanks, vehicles, artillery), LCT (Same as LCM, just 3 X as much) and possibly LSM. They would carry the divisional artillery, the third infantry regiment (less the divisional reserve) ammunition and supplies.

      Additional LVT battalions of the tractor and tank types would be available for the pre and post X-day landings to the tune of four to six LVT tractor and two to three LVT tank.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.