Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Vietnam: The Delusion of the Popular Uprising

    Posted by Shannon Love on October 13th, 2010 (All posts by )

    [Note: This is a subpost linked to by Vietnam, Israel and the Left’s Delusional Narratives. Feel free to comment but the post might not make much sense without the parent post’s context.]

    Delusion: The war in South Vietnam was a popular uprising against an unpopular minority government

    Reality: The outcome of the Tet offensive proved this idea conclusively wrong. We now know that the North Vietnamese did really believe they had wide popular support in the South and that, if they could just seize control of enough of the country, the oppressed people of the South would rise up in mass to join them, making it impossible for America to maintain control. That did not happen. Not only did the people not rise up but the people actively rebelled against the Viet Cong, especially after the Viet Cong began mass executions and atrocities in the areas they controlled.

    By the time the “peace” movement became a major player circa 1970, only a small minority of South Vietnamese wanted to live under communist rule.

    The Vietnamese did obviously wish to be a free and independent people, but that did not translate into them wanting to adopt a foreign idea, communism, nor did it mean they wanted to trade western capitalist colonial masters for western communist ones.

    It should have been apparent to the “intellectuals” of the “peace” movement that the people of Vietnam would have preferred a form of government that arose from their own culture and traditions. But no, the “intellectuals” of the “peace” movement arrogantly asserted that the majority of Vietnamese, who were largely uneducated subsistence farmers, had all read Das Kapital and wanted to be communist. In truth, all they really wanted was for everyone else to leave them alone. The communist superpowers would not allow that.

    In 1972 South Vietnam had a successful round of elections that laid the groundwork of a real democracy. Two years later we abandoned them utterly, leaving them alone to face the full might of the Soviet Union and Mao’s China.


    2 Responses to “Vietnam: The Delusion of the Popular Uprising”

    1. TMLutas Says:

      You should be careful in distinguishing between the unpopularity of any particular government and the governing system. Politicians may have horrible popularity numbers (see: George W Bush) without them affecting the popularity of the underlying system that elected them. What is true in the US was certainly true with regard to South Vietnam. The idea of selecting your own indigenous leadership is the system, and likely very popular. Any group of politicians selected might or might not work out.

    2. Dennis Says:

      “…In truth, all they really wanted was for everyone else to leave them alone.”

      That was exactly what we were told by an infantry training instructor at Camp LeJeune in 1966. He followed with, “your job is to watch out for each other because they’re just poor rice farmers and don’t really care who runs the government or whether you live or die”. Funny how a dumb grunt understood that but the intellectuals didn’t. Of course that particular individual had already served a tour there.

      Semper Fi!

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.