<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Chicago Meteor of 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/1895.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/1895.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:39:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/1895.html/comment-page-1#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/001895.php#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>I think that a decade is still probably too long, given that typical contract durations are no more than a few months. You have to be able to interest people in betting, after all. Maybe there will be enough interest, but I&#039;m skeptical. There are other longshot bets that have (probably) quicker payoffs.

Tsunamis, volcano eruptions, and, especially, storms, should be more easily doable. A one-season hurricane contract would be a natural, as would tornado-damage and flood contracts. (Currently they list only a few snow contracts.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that a decade is still probably too long, given that typical contract durations are no more than a few months. You have to be able to interest people in betting, after all. Maybe there will be enough interest, but I&#8217;m skeptical. There are other longshot bets that have (probably) quicker payoffs.</p>
<p>Tsunamis, volcano eruptions, and, especially, storms, should be more easily doable. A one-season hurricane contract would be a natural, as would tornado-damage and flood contracts. (Currently they list only a few snow contracts.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Manifold</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/1895.html/comment-page-1#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Manifold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/001895.php#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily.  Reasonable predictions on shorter timescales, on the order of a decade, could include:
Large explosion (~100 kT) in upper atmosphere (~30 km altitude) in politically sensitive region, &lt;i&gt;eg&lt;/i&gt; Indian subcontinent.
Small tsunami (onshore wave height of a few meters) caused by oceanic impact, most likely in Pacific.
Recovery of large fragment (~10-100 kg) immediately after impact in a populated area.
Successful prediction/observation of near-miss close enough to be naked-eye visible from some inhabited portion of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily.  Reasonable predictions on shorter timescales, on the order of a decade, could include:<br />
Large explosion (~100 kT) in upper atmosphere (~30 km altitude) in politically sensitive region, <i>eg</i> Indian subcontinent.<br />
Small tsunami (onshore wave height of a few meters) caused by oceanic impact, most likely in Pacific.<br />
Recovery of large fragment (~10-100 kg) immediately after impact in a populated area.<br />
Successful prediction/observation of near-miss close enough to be naked-eye visible from some inhabited portion of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/1895.html/comment-page-1#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/001895.php#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>It might be interesting to create prediction contracts for events of this type -- e.g., odds of a fatal impact by a particular date. OTOH such contracts might not work, because the most useful time-horizons might be too long for practical betting purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be interesting to create prediction contracts for events of this type &#8212; e.g., odds of a fatal impact by a particular date. OTOH such contracts might not work, because the most useful time-horizons might be too long for practical betting purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
