<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Questions On Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/comment-page-1#comment-5498</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002412.php#comment-5498</guid>
		<description>I think that the most important thing to remember is that Iraq isn&#039;t a separate war so much as a theater of operations.

In order to fight Islamic fundamentalism outside of the United States, we needed to gain a foothold in the region.  

We did start in Afghanistan to hunt down Al Qaeda (and for reasons unknown, many americans still believe that the War on Terror is only a war against Al Qaeda).  It is tough to use this as a base for operations in the Middle East as it is merely on the edge and we want a more centralized location.

So we had Afghanistan and Pakistan on our side at the moment.  Remember the axis of evil?  Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq border Iran.  I think that we took Iraq first as a way to pressure Iran while gaining an important position at the crossroads of the Middle East and also attempting to secure Iraqs WMD programs.  We also took out a brutal regime led by an imperial fascist (Mr. Hussein wanted to rule all of the Middle East).

I think that Iraq was supposed to be a &quot;magnet&quot; for the terrorists and this wouldnt catch as well in Afghanistan which is very mountainous.  So we have all of these terrorists pouring in to fight us in Iraq.  The think is that when people like John Kerry say it was a distraction from the War on Terror, they couldn&#039;t be more wrong.  It is actually the main theater right now.  We chose where to battle and the jihadists followed.  It is certainly a distraction for their &quot;War on America&quot; and take it that they would rather spend more resources defending what they consider Muslim soil against infidels than planning to attack our increasingly more secure homeland.

And one more thing:  those who still think that not catching OBL amounts to us losing the War just to get it, they still think it is a police action. 

Overall, I think that it is a pretty good strategy.  I may have not explained it well enough, but I think that it is good.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the most important thing to remember is that Iraq isn&#8217;t a separate war so much as a theater of operations.</p>
<p>In order to fight Islamic fundamentalism outside of the United States, we needed to gain a foothold in the region.  </p>
<p>We did start in Afghanistan to hunt down Al Qaeda (and for reasons unknown, many americans still believe that the War on Terror is only a war against Al Qaeda).  It is tough to use this as a base for operations in the Middle East as it is merely on the edge and we want a more centralized location.</p>
<p>So we had Afghanistan and Pakistan on our side at the moment.  Remember the axis of evil?  Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq border Iran.  I think that we took Iraq first as a way to pressure Iran while gaining an important position at the crossroads of the Middle East and also attempting to secure Iraqs WMD programs.  We also took out a brutal regime led by an imperial fascist (Mr. Hussein wanted to rule all of the Middle East).</p>
<p>I think that Iraq was supposed to be a &#8220;magnet&#8221; for the terrorists and this wouldnt catch as well in Afghanistan which is very mountainous.  So we have all of these terrorists pouring in to fight us in Iraq.  The think is that when people like John Kerry say it was a distraction from the War on Terror, they couldn&#8217;t be more wrong.  It is actually the main theater right now.  We chose where to battle and the jihadists followed.  It is certainly a distraction for their &#8220;War on America&#8221; and take it that they would rather spend more resources defending what they consider Muslim soil against infidels than planning to attack our increasingly more secure homeland.</p>
<p>And one more thing:  those who still think that not catching OBL amounts to us losing the War just to get it, they still think it is a police action. </p>
<p>Overall, I think that it is a pretty good strategy.  I may have not explained it well enough, but I think that it is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/comment-page-1#comment-5497</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002412.php#comment-5497</guid>
		<description>Finally, there&#039;s a discussion at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnxp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;gnxp.com about the Thomas P.M. Barnett essay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/published/pentagonsnewmap.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; preview to the book, The Pentagon&#039;s New Map.&lt;/a&gt;  GNXP.com contributors approach the issue from a slightly different perspective.

Barnett&#039;s essay deals with many of the issues in both your discussion, and the belmontclub.blogspot.com discussion I linked to above.

Thanks again for an excellent read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, there&#8217;s a discussion at <a href="http://www.gnxp.com" rel="nofollow"></a>gnxp.com about the Thomas P.M. Barnett essay <a href="http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/published/pentagonsnewmap.htm" rel="nofollow"> preview to the book, The Pentagon&#8217;s New Map.</a>  GNXP.com contributors approach the issue from a slightly different perspective.</p>
<p>Barnett&#8217;s essay deals with many of the issues in both your discussion, and the belmontclub.blogspot.com discussion I linked to above.</p>
<p>Thanks again for an excellent read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/comment-page-1#comment-5496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002412.php#comment-5496</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Shannon, and well said.

Also check out an interesting discussion on the same topic at &lt;a href=&quot;http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2004/09/two-wars-robert-kaplan-summarizes-real.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;belmontclub.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;.

This is a far deeper topic than most Kerry-boppers are prepared to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Shannon, and well said.</p>
<p>Also check out an interesting discussion on the same topic at <a href="http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2004/09/two-wars-robert-kaplan-summarizes-real.html" rel="nofollow">belmontclub.blogspot.com</a>.</p>
<p>This is a far deeper topic than most Kerry-boppers are prepared to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobthebellbuoy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/comment-page-1#comment-5495</link>
		<dc:creator>bobthebellbuoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002412.php#comment-5495</guid>
		<description>Shannon
Excellent insight and a worthy rebuttal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon<br />
Excellent insight and a worthy rebuttal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol' Guy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2412.html/comment-page-1#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol' Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002412.php#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>I hope you&#039;re correct, Shannon, but I think that the &quot;insurgency&quot; (read as &quot;terrorism&quot;) is likely to last at least until the Iraqi elections in January. True, they hope to influence the US elections, but also create fear in Iraq to keep Iraqis from the poles so they can claim the election is not legitimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re correct, Shannon, but I think that the &#8220;insurgency&#8221; (read as &#8220;terrorism&#8221;) is likely to last at least until the Iraqi elections in January. True, they hope to influence the US elections, but also create fear in Iraq to keep Iraqis from the poles so they can claim the election is not legitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

