<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worse Than Nothing At All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2598.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2598.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:59:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bixby</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2598.html/comment-page-1#comment-7718</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bixby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002598.php#comment-7718</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t find an email for Shannon, so I&#039;ll post it here. She did such a great job with the lancet study, I thought she may be able to take a look at a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/info/exitpolls-1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; linked to by and hosted at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Electoral-vote.com&lt;/a&gt;. It claims to highlight the &quot;discrepancy&quot; between the exit polls and the actual votes counts (all without claiming that there was vote fraud, of course). It trigged my BS-detector as I highlight &lt;a href=&quot;http://misterbixby.blogspot.com/2004/11/vote-fraud-but-i-dont-mean-that-in-bad.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I just think there are bigger systemic problems with this paper than I could determine. Anyone else who can separate the wheat from the chaff would be appreciated. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t find an email for Shannon, so I&#8217;ll post it here. She did such a great job with the lancet study, I thought she may be able to take a look at a <a href="http://www.electoral-vote.com/info/exitpolls-1.pdf" rel="nofollow">study</a> linked to by and hosted at <a href="http://www.electoral-vote.com" rel="nofollow">Electoral-vote.com</a>. It claims to highlight the &#8220;discrepancy&#8221; between the exit polls and the actual votes counts (all without claiming that there was vote fraud, of course). It trigged my BS-detector as I highlight <a href="http://misterbixby.blogspot.com/2004/11/vote-fraud-but-i-dont-mean-that-in-bad.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I just think there are bigger systemic problems with this paper than I could determine. Anyone else who can separate the wheat from the chaff would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fade</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2598.html/comment-page-1#comment-7717</link>
		<dc:creator>fade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002598.php#comment-7717</guid>
		<description>Ur right but we look forward to give the provisional goverment chance to check USA product toward settlement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ur right but we look forward to give the provisional goverment chance to check USA product toward settlement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/2598.html/comment-page-1#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/002598.php#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>However many people argue that it &lt;i&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; badly flawed, and that your argument (linked above) is misleading and based on a misrepresentation of the theory and evidence.  The &quot;cluster sampling critique&quot; that you link to is wrong, and I am surprised that you are still pushing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However many people argue that it <i>isn&#8217;t</i> badly flawed, and that your argument (linked above) is misleading and based on a misrepresentation of the theory and evidence.  The &#8220;cluster sampling critique&#8221; that you link to is wrong, and I am surprised that you are still pushing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
