Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Assorted Links, or, I wish I could think up a better title for this post….

    Posted by onparkstreet on January 25th, 2012 (All posts by )

    The US could be almost self-sufficent for energy by 2030, while the EU will be the most vulnerable region for energy security, BP said on Wednesday.
     
    Growth in shale oil and gas production would mean the US needed few imports, while North America as a whole could be self-sufficient, BP forecast at its Global Energy Outlook 2030.
     
    BP forecast that Eurasia could also become self-sufficient, based on the prediction that Europe would being a net importer of energy, and the former Soviet Union countries net exporters by a similar amount.
     
    In practice, this would leave the EU the most vulnerable region for energy security.

    The Telegraph

    Friends, I have no particular knowledge of this subject. If you have anything to add in comments, I’d love to hear it.

    Ah, age. One of the most daring aspects of this novel is that Lively is concerned with the hearts and problems of older characters. Her major players are well past their youth, and a boyish up-and-coming historian (the snake in Lord Henry’s mansion) doesn’t become important until much of the novel has passed. “How much remains when youth is gone?” Lively seems to be asking. And the answer is, “An abundance.” Here middle and old age are times of blossoming identity and possibility, miraculous bursts of sunshine.

    – The New York Times reviews Penelope Lively’s novel, How it All Began.

    Even as a twenty-something, I was fascinated with literary representations of middle age. An odd one, that’s me.

     

    9 Responses to “Assorted Links, or, I wish I could think up a better title for this post….”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      “How much remains when youth is gone?” Lively seems to be asking. And the answer is, “An abundance.”

      Man, I hope so.

    2. Percy Dovetonsils Says:

      So, a bankrupt, demographically feeble, energy-poor Europe… all I can say is, heh.

    3. Rachel Says:

      Penelope Lively is a wonderful writer.

    4. John Wolfsberger, Jr. Says:

      Regarding the EU and energy, Western and Central Europe have reserves that would allow them to dramatically reduce dependence on imports, if not eliminate it. Needless to say, the “environmentalists” are doing everything possible to prevent that.

      I do wonder where Big Green gets the money to pay for all of their activities.

    5. Elfsta Says:

      “In practice, this would leave the EU the most vulnerable region for energy security.”

      Well they could maybe get us to keep waging war for oil in North Africa and their other former colonies.*

      *The Libyan adventure of 2011, and the 1991 Gulf War were for oil. In the case of 1991 we don’t need to debate it, that was the reason given at the time. It was also the reason Carter committed us to war if necessary [it has been] for oil. The Carter Doctrine is war for oil.

    6. onparkstreet Says:

      Jonathan – That line stood out to me, too.

      Percy Dovetonsils – We are such big mutual trading partners that all of that makes me worry. Gulp!

      Rachel – I know, right? I loved The Road to Lichfield and According to Mark, but sometime around Moon Tiger I stopped liking her novels for some reason. Maybe I need a rethink on her later stuff.

      John Wolfsberger, Jr. – Thanks for that information. Science is so politicized these days it’s tough for an honest person to know what the heck is going on. I’m surprised that other people are surprised by skepticism toward environmental science.

      Elfsta – Yup on The Carter Doctrine. Honestly, I worry about plans to maybe expand NATO. I am such a skeptical person, though. Perhaps too skeptical.

      – Madhu

    7. dearieme Says:

      Middle age? Be lucky with your health. And your spouse.

    8. dearieme Says:

      And your children.

    9. onparkstreet Says:

      @ Dearieme – Oops, missed your comments earlier. Sorry :) Family is everything, isn’t it?

      – Madhu

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.