Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • So Far From God

    Posted by Sgt. Mom on June 18th, 2012 (All posts by )

    Poor Mexico, runs the saying usually attributed to long-time Mexican strongman Porfirio Diaz, So far from God, so close to the United States. I was thinking of this, when we went to see the movie For Greater Glory – mostly because I had seen brief mention of it here and there on the libertarian-conservative side of the blogosphere, and the whole premise of it interested me, mostly because I had never heard of such a thing as the Cristero War. Never heard of it, and it happened in the lifetime of my grandparents, in the country right next door … and heck, in California we studied Mexico in the sixth grade. It appeared from casual conversation with the dozen or so people who caught the early matinee at a movie multiplex in San Antonio, only one of them had ever heard of it, either. Was there some cosmic cover-up, or did we have troubles enough of our own at the time … or was it just that Mexico was so constantly in turmoil that one more horrific civil struggle just blended seamlessly into the one before and the one after?

    Whatever the reason is, For Greater Glory would be a good introduction to the matter – when Plutarco Elias Callas – an aggressive and a rabidly anti-clerical autocrat took advantage of his position at the top of national authority in Mexico to confound, hamper and severely limit the influence of the established Catholic Church. In this, Callas was in conformity with other progressive secularists both fascist and communist. The church was seen as retarding the advance of Mexico generally into the glories of 20th century modernity … and so it seemed only logical that such an influence should be radically pruned if not eliminated altogether. Existing laws should be enforced to the letter and more, and new ones created. Unfortunately, the government soon ran slap up against the resistance of the sincerely devout, but also of secularists who genuinely preferred that civil authority keep hands off religious matters – that citizens have free choice in the practice of religion. Passive resistance to the civil authority in the form of protests, petitions and boycotts – soon proved fruitless. And very soon, the government began responding with force: hanging priests, wrecking churches, and otherwise waging war on the religious protestors, in the spirit of providing a salutary example to other dissenters. This being Mexico, with a stiff-necked population unaccustomed to suffer violent repression with patient fortitude, the religious resistants soon began organizing and shooting back. Several of the most able commanders were in fact, ordained priests. But contradictions abound; the ostensible hero of Glory is General Enrique Gorostieta (Andy Garcia) – a retired veteran of the previous wars, a skilled strategist – and at the beginning, an agnostic. He is hired by the consortium of resistants, for a generous salary and the assurance that his wife and daughters will have security in the event of his death … and he turns out to be worth every penny.

    For Greater Glory is an epic, with a magnificent cast, and expertly filmed in locations to match; there is not a cheesy-low-budget corner-cutting moment in the whole thing. That said – there are almost too many characters to deal adequately with their stories, their personalities and their fates. The movie itself ends ambiguously – not with the bang of victory clearly won, but with the whimper of a negotiated settlement brokered by the American ambassador – who shown as being rather torn between horror at the brutality meted out to the Cristeros and worry about American economic interests in Mexico. After coming home this afternoon, I went snorkeling around the internet, looking for background information about the Cristero War, and discovered that the American institution which backed the Cristeros most strongly were the Knights of Columbus … and that ironically, it is claimed that some leaders of the KKK – as ferocious anti-Catholics – sent telegrams of advice and encouragement to Plutarco Callas.

    Above all, it is supremely ironic that For Greater Glory is coming out now … just when the Obama administration is running slap up against the religious principles held by many Americans regarding gay marriage, abortion and whether religious institutions or individuals should yield to civil authority … or not. As a minor note; those dangers posed to civil society of laws on the books, which are enforced by the whim of prosecutors should also be made clear, as well as the danger of an autocrat ruling by executive orders. A quick scan of reviews finds a curiously mixed bag – the NY Times loved it with reservations, many other major reviewers panned or praised with faint damns, but many ordinary bloggers or those with a religious orientation seemed to love it.

    (Later – Cross-posted at


    6 Responses to “So Far From God”

    1. Ginny Says:

      I really appreciate your review; I have been bombarded with e-mails praising it from one of my friends (you’d be amazed at how links can be generated in an hour by someone spending a lot of time with the Catholic Bishops, First Things, etc.). I trust his judgement, but it isn’t that he doesn’t have an obsession. This is the kind of thing thst we don’t see enough of – cases of heroism, arguments for freedom, etc. Probably helps that Andy Garcia is Cuban.

    2. Bill Brandt Says:

      Thanks for the review – I was remarking just yesterday that even for the summer there are so few movies worth seeing (Battleship?? that when a good review comes – it is welcomed.

    3. Rick Says:

      Liked the movie but it does have problems. I think your observation that there were too many stories to tell was the central problem. On the other hand, the stories it told were on the whole real adds a certain power to the movie which it wouldn’t have otherwise. And frankly, I always get a kick out of pro-Catholic stories since Progressives REALLY hate the Catholic Church. Progressives don’t like competitors.

    4. John Wolfsberger, Jr. Says:

      For Plutarco Elias Callas, as with Leftists of any stripe, the First Commandment is: “I am the State thy god, thou shalt place no other God before me.”

      As far as the movie goes, I strongly recommend it. I think it could have used tighter editing and better scripting in some areas. On the other hand, the producers had no where near the budget the story deserves. For those who didn’t already know, the Knights of Columbus provided a good share of it.

      As for “… ironically, it is claimed that some leaders of the KKK – as ferocious anti-Catholics – sent telegrams of advice and encouragement to Plutarco Callas.” The KKK has always hated blacks, Jews and Catholics, the order depending on what’s happening in their private reality on any given day. Although there is a certain macabre amusement to be had listening to the contortions they’ll go through to explain that Jesus wasn’t really Jewish.

    5. Sgt. Mom Says:

      Agree with John W:”I am the State thy God…” – the secular politician, intellectual and entertainor today has absolutely no idea of how the religious believer thinks, acts and lives. No idea at all, save for the broadest of caricatures, which they wind up believing. I am thinking that this movie will be an underground hit, and none of the professional Hollywoodists will be able to figure out why. And the Obamanauts will never figure out why observant Catholics and other religious Americans will resist their diktats so fiercely.

    6. Mrs. Davis Says:

      The KKK hated Germans, too. Even in Texas.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.