<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:10:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael David Rubin</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12629</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael David Rubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12629</guid>
		<description>Serious question: why, &amp;/or how, do you does one continue living with a &quot;liberal&quot; wife? I ask, in this polarized age, to gain insight about a personal relation. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s trivial to recognize that partitioning one&#039;s psychic life, Clinton-fashion, involves a kind of denial of reality, when adjoining compartments contain deeply opposed values. Does tolerance of conflicting views in the civic sphere also require hostility in the sphere of intimacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serious question: why, &amp;/or how, do you does one continue living with a &#8220;liberal&#8221; wife? I ask, in this polarized age, to gain insight about a personal relation. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s trivial to recognize that partitioning one&#8217;s psychic life, Clinton-fashion, involves a kind of denial of reality, when adjoining compartments contain deeply opposed values. Does tolerance of conflicting views in the civic sphere also require hostility in the sphere of intimacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 15:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>Found it. It was the St. Petersburg Times 3 months ago. And it wasn&#039;t a print spread, but a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sptimes.com/2004/webspecials04/medalofhonor/default.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;multimedia presentation.&lt;/a&gt; Highly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found it. It was the St. Petersburg Times 3 months ago. And it wasn&#8217;t a print spread, but a <a href="http://www.sptimes.com/2004/webspecials04/medalofhonor/default.shtml" rel="nofollow">multimedia presentation.</a> Highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 15:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12627</guid>
		<description>I was familiar with his story. I read it some time ago in print somewhere. It was quite a spread, complete with graphics illustrating the battle, but I don&#039;t recall any mention of a Medal of Honor, which makes me think that it predated the official announcement of the award. Sgt Smith&#039;s Medal of Honor was reported a couple of months ago in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30916F6395B0C738FDDAA0894DD404482&amp;incamp=archive:search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New York Times.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was familiar with his story. I read it some time ago in print somewhere. It was quite a spread, complete with graphics illustrating the battle, but I don&#8217;t recall any mention of a Medal of Honor, which makes me think that it predated the official announcement of the award. Sgt Smith&#8217;s Medal of Honor was reported a couple of months ago in the <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30916F6395B0C738FDDAA0894DD404482&amp;incamp=archive:search" rel="nofollow">New York Times.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.scott barnard</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>j.scott barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 19:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>I think I read about him over at Juan Cole and Daily Kos. Oh, wait... ... ...no I didn&#039;t. Sorry. I did read one of the Daily Kos contributors, not Kos himself, say on the occasion of delivering the Medal of Honor into the hands of Smith&#039;s 11-year-old son, that Bush was &quot;pandering to militarism&quot;. He goes on to question whether we should be giving the country&#039;s highest award to someone who died in a war, rather than say someone who lived a life for peace, etc...(http://newdirection.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/4/5/12263/46022) As to your original post, you can bet ABC will report on this Medal of Honor winner. The report will only be about 2 seconds long as they read the names of all the war dead. No context will be provided. Just his name and rank. Because we don&#039;t have time for heros anymore. Not unless they run away from their weddings or invite children to Neverland.

Off topic -- for anyone who might be older than me, I&#039;m in my thirties, was it THIS bad during Vietnam? The polarization, I mean. And the media bias. And the level of vitriol spewed at our nation&#039;s leaders by the opposition and the wingnuts...?

I remember my father cussing for the first time in front of me. Abbie Hoffman appeared in some documentary or news segment. I laughed it off. But that&#039;s now how I react when I see Michael Moore. --scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I read about him over at Juan Cole and Daily Kos. Oh, wait&#8230; &#8230; &#8230;no I didn&#8217;t. Sorry. I did read one of the Daily Kos contributors, not Kos himself, say on the occasion of delivering the Medal of Honor into the hands of Smith&#8217;s 11-year-old son, that Bush was &#8220;pandering to militarism&#8221;. He goes on to question whether we should be giving the country&#8217;s highest award to someone who died in a war, rather than say someone who lived a life for peace, etc&#8230;(http://newdirection.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/4/5/12263/46022) As to your original post, you can bet ABC will report on this Medal of Honor winner. The report will only be about 2 seconds long as they read the names of all the war dead. No context will be provided. Just his name and rank. Because we don&#8217;t have time for heros anymore. Not unless they run away from their weddings or invite children to Neverland.</p>
<p>Off topic &#8212; for anyone who might be older than me, I&#8217;m in my thirties, was it THIS bad during Vietnam? The polarization, I mean. And the media bias. And the level of vitriol spewed at our nation&#8217;s leaders by the opposition and the wingnuts&#8230;?</p>
<p>I remember my father cussing for the first time in front of me. Abbie Hoffman appeared in some documentary or news segment. I laughed it off. But that&#8217;s now how I react when I see Michael Moore. &#8211;scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Middleman in Central New York</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12630</link>
		<dc:creator>Middleman in Central New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 18:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12630</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Oh media, Oh Media&lt;/strong&gt;

Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith

Have you heard of this man? I had not either, until today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oh media, Oh Media</strong></p>
<p>Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith</p>
<p>Have you heard of this man? I had not either, until today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>James and Bruce -- We should not have to read the milblogs or the blogospheric right to know about this man.  But the fact that we even have milblogs and the blogospheric right is the only reason why you, and now I, finally, have heard of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James and Bruce &#8212; We should not have to read the milblogs or the blogospheric right to know about this man.  But the fact that we even have milblogs and the blogospheric right is the only reason why you, and now I, finally, have heard of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R. Rummel</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12624</link>
		<dc:creator>James R. Rummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12624</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But you have not heard of Paul R. Smith.&lt;/i&gt;

Some of us have.  Those that read the milblogs, at any rate.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But you have not heard of Paul R. Smith.</i></p>
<p>Some of us have.  Those that read the milblogs, at any rate.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Chang</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12623</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 06:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12623</guid>
		<description>SGT Smith&#039;s name is not a new one to readers of the blogospheric right.  May he rest in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SGT Smith&#8217;s name is not a new one to readers of the blogospheric right.  May he rest in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginny</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 00:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12622</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Lex.
And thanks to Sergeant First Class Smith for what he did and what he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Lex.<br />
And thanks to Sergeant First Class Smith for what he did and what he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heddleson</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12621</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heddleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12621</guid>
		<description>Newsweek has gone onto &lt;a href=&quot;http://memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=677&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;al-Jazerrra&lt;/a&gt; to recant its retraction of the story. It&#039;s a good thing they&#039;ve got the first Amendment. I am beginning to wonder if they plan to test its precedence over Art III, Section 3 of the Constitution (Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newsweek has gone onto <a href="http://memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=677" rel="nofollow">al-Jazerrra</a> to recant its retraction of the story. It&#8217;s a good thing they&#8217;ve got the first Amendment. I am beginning to wonder if they plan to test its precedence over Art III, Section 3 of the Constitution (Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3183.html/comment-page-1#comment-12620</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www390.pair.com/chicagob/blog/003183.php#comment-12620</guid>
		<description>Lex, your epitaph for Seargent First Class Paul R. Smith brought tears to my eyes.  The injustice that our &quot;news&quot; media dealt to him makes me angry beyond words.

Thanks for publicizing this man&#039;s honor.  I would not have heard of him if I had not logged onto Chicagoboyz today.

At least our Pentagon, and our blogosphere have their priorities in the right place.
-Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex, your epitaph for Seargent First Class Paul R. Smith brought tears to my eyes.  The injustice that our &#8220;news&#8221; media dealt to him makes me angry beyond words.</p>
<p>Thanks for publicizing this man&#8217;s honor.  I would not have heard of him if I had not logged onto Chicagoboyz today.</p>
<p>At least our Pentagon, and our blogosphere have their priorities in the right place.<br />
-Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

