Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Dude…Ever Notice How Much a Joint Looks Like a Ship Move-y Thingy?

    Posted by Shannon Love on November 16th, 2012 (All posts by )

    The brain is highly associative. It’s interesting how you suddenly make a connection.

    So, I’m listening to my “Minnie the Moocher” channel on Pandora and up popped a Cab Calloway song I had never heard before, “Reefer man.” I was only listening with half an ear but the first verse triggered a connection.

    “Man, what’s the matter with that cat there?”
    “Must be full of reefer”
    “Full of reefer?!”
    “Yeah, man!”
    “You mean that cat’s high?”
    “Sailing lightly!”
    “Get away from here!”
    “Man is that the reefer man?”
    “That’s the reefer man.”

    When the call and reply got to “you mean that cat’s high…sailing, ” it clicked that in the days of sail that sails were “reefed” by pulling them into rolls. It was also sailor slang for a midshipmen or other novice.

    The Online Etymology Dictionary confirmed that the marijuana “reefer” is probably related to the appearance of a reefed sail. It seems that way back in the day (1930s at least) the association with sailing was strong enough for “sailing” to be a synonym for “high”. I’m pretty sure “high” itself, as a term for doing or feeling well, most likely originated from the higher pay and status received by that sailers who worked as toppers high up on the masts. When a sailor was doing well professionally, he was “high.”

    I’d never thought about the origin of the term “reefer” as slang for a marijuana joint. Knowing as many stoners as I have, I just assumed it was, like everything else stoners do, somehow related to bong making.


    4 Responses to “Dude…Ever Notice How Much a Joint Looks Like a Ship Move-y Thingy?”

    1. James Augustine Says:

      And what about the hemp/rope making connection?

    2. Bill Brandt Says:

      Interesting connection to the term “reefer” – to me the history of language slang is fascinating – some going back to the middle ages.

      Three Sheets To The Wind” goes back to 1821

    3. Shannon Love Says:

      Bill Brandt,

      I think it revealing just how much of our slang and colloquialisms come from sailing. It shows just how important sea borne trade was to the development of the anglo-sphere.

    4. Shannon Love Says:

      James Augustine,

      And what about the hemp/rope making connection?

      There probably wasn’t much connection. THC only occurs in any concentration in the buds of immature plants and there isn’t any in the fibers that go into rope. You can’t get high by smoking a hemp rope. Sailors in the age of sail probably had no idea that the source plant for their rope had intoxicating properties.

      The strains of the marijuana/hemp plant used for making rope where thick and fibrous with a low THC content. If you tried to smoke them, even young plants and bulbs, they wouldn’t smolder but burst into flames. While the properties of the hemp plant as a intoxicant or herbal medicine were known for thousands of years, the low THC content meant that just smoking the plant was pointless. Instead, they had to make a paste or gum by extraction from a large number of buds followed by reduction.

      IIRC, the smokable strains originated somewhere in the middle east over the last two centuries and from there jumped to Latin America and the Caribbean. Sometime in the late late 1800s or early 1900s, immigrants from Latin America brought it to the US and from there it spread world wide.

      During the age of sail, anyone getting high would have been smoking a gummy ball in a pipe or hooka instead of a rolled cigarette. (For that matter, the tobacco cigarette is a 20th century invention.)

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.