Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Seventy

    Posted by Jay Manifold on December 2nd, 2012 (All posts by )

    “On the afternoon of December 2, 1942, the Atomic Age began inside an enormous tent on a squash court under the stands of the University of Chicago’s Stagg Field. There, headed by Italian scientist Enrico Fermi, the first controlled nuclear fission chain reaction was engineered. The result—sustainable nuclear energy—led to creation of the atomic bomb and nuclear power plants—two of the twentieth century’s most powerful and controversial achievements.”

    I was there halfway between then and now. I am a by-product of the Manhattan Project, being the son of a onetime rifleman in an infantry platoon who was on a troopship in the Pacific on August 6, 1945, in transit for Operation Downfall. He went to the Philippines instead, and never heard a shot fired in anger. I did not matriculate at Chicago to repay a debt – which is fortunate, because as things went, the University spent a good deal of money on me for (so far) no return whatsoever.

    Earlier today I went to a lecture, “Talking Tolkien: War and J.R.R. Tolkien,” in the appropriately subterranean research center of the National World War I Museum at Liberty Memorial. It was given by Janet Brennan Croft of the University of Oklahoma, who has a book out that I suppose I will buy, to add to the same shelf containing the Hobbit, the trilogy, the Silmarillion, the Letters, and Tolkien and the Great War (all of which were referenced at some point in her talk).

    I didn’t hear all that much that was new, but I didn’t expect to. It was well worth going, however; I suppose the biggest “delta” was about how his writing changed after he had children and especially when two of them served in the military in WWII. She also pointed out that all the heroic leaders in the trilogy lead from the front, while the villainous leaders are far in the rear, the equivalent of the “chateau generals.”

    Another insight was how much the “black breath” and Frodo’s melancholia resemble PTSD. In combination with her remarks about parent-child relationships, this caused me to ask a question about what turns out to be Letter #74, written to Stanley Unwin on 29 June 1944, which includes the sentence: “I have at the moment another son, a much damaged soldier, at Trinity trying to do some work and recover a shadow of his old health.” – a reference to his son Michael, who was pretty severely PTSD’d for a while. So out of slightly morbid curiosity, I asked if she knew anything more about that episode. She did not but said that there are probably more letters, unpublished, that would have details, and perhaps they will eventually see the light of day.

    Scripture reading in church this morning was Isaiah 2:1-5. Verse 4 is of course poignant in light of today’s anniversary. If we really are entering the Crisis of 2020, those swords won’t be beaten into plowshares any time soon. Indeed, some future analog of December 2nd, 1942, presumably involving nanomachinery rather than tons of graphite blocks and lumps of enriched uranium, will happen in a laboratory somewhere in the world in another decade or so.


    4 Responses to “Seventy”

    1. Mike K Says:

      I read the “crisis of 2020” link but missed the details of the crisis. I do agree there will be a crisis but it is a consequence of the recent election and not a theory of cycles. George Friedman, who runs, recently wrote a book about “the next 100 years,” and mentions a theory of 20 year cycles.

      I do not believe the “millennial generation” has any heroic aspect to it and looks to me like just another generation of moochers. I have daughters born in 1980 and 1990. I love them and the younger one seems to have her sh*t together but I don’t know if either will ever own a home. So far, I have bought everything they needed that would have required saving, like I did. The older of the two is very bright and speaks four languages but doesn’t seem to be organized around accomplishment other than academics. She was complaining about jobs for anthropologists when she got her first degree. I suggested the army, which was recruiting anthropologists at the time, and she was horrified.

    2. IGotBupkis, Legally Defined Cyberbully in All 57 States Says:

      }}} So far, I have bought everything they needed that would have required saving, like I did.
      }}} I suggested the army, which was recruiting anthropologists at the time, and she was horrified.

      Ummmm… The two are perhaps related? She expects the world to provide for her, not to have to actually strive and do things she might not enjoy (i.e., “delayed gratification”).

      How much of this is generational and how much tied to your own parental technique is the relevant question.

      Note: No judgement intended or suggested, just observations re: cause and effect.

    3. John Cunningham Says:

      When I was in undergrad school at Michigan State in the mid-60s, I took a “Physics for Poets” class from physics prof. John Taylor. he was a grad student at Chicago in the early 1940s, and he was at the squash court the day that the atom was split. he had some great stories about Fermi, Oppenheimer, Teller, etc.

    4. Michael Kennedy Says:

      “How much of this is generational and how much tied to your own parental technique is the relevant question.”

      I have a theory that I have encouraged this behavior although my motivation seems to be guilt. I have been divorced twice and regret that the younger kids have had their lives disrupted. Fortunately, the older of the two is a wonderful person and very accomplished but does not seem to have the commercial gene that would encourage her to succeed at supporting herself. Her husband, also a nice guy , is no more practical than she is. The youngest has ambition but she is very annoyed with me when I decline her offers to accept more money from me. The latest occasion was today.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.