Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Consumer Question – 23andme

    Posted by Ginny on December 7th, 2012 (All posts by )

    The musings on the random and tragic nature of life remind us of how little we know – and control. But it reminded me of the marketing of a step toward more control: how good are the DNA products? My daughter’s friend, visiting for Thanksgiving, sent her spit to 23andme. The results included a genetic tendency toward weight-related diseases, which led her to a diet and gym membership. Not surprisingly, it linked her with her mother, but also with a cousin neither she nor her mother knew existed. They met, looked each other over, compared notes: they were cousins.

    Anyway, she sat in our living room flipping through her smart phone (it gives monthly updates); she was vulnerable to diabetes but less so to Parkinson’s. Genetic weaknesses are becoming obvious as we near retirement; unfortunately, we learn our vulnerabilities at every office visit.

    Still, has anyone done this or similar ones? How accurate, how useful, and how much does this (or do others) add to the cloud-knowledge of genes & disease? (Other friends used a different site, but learned what human history would say – that they were both from England and before that Africa.)

    Of course, whether it is worth the money or not, whether it is accurate or not, ignores the big question: does such knowledge lead us to believe we have an autonomy still not – never will be – ours? Will knowing more of “who we are” mislead or arm us?

     

    5 Responses to “Consumer Question – 23andme”

    1. Assistant Village Idiot Says:

      That’s the thing about knowledge. Anything that gives us greater power over ourselves and nature has obvious benefits. But such power also brings potentially pernicious effects: the possibility of intensifying our faults rather than virtues, and the possibility of increased power over others (which implies an increased power of others over us).

      We have come to consider all such increases as net positives. But you are wise to consider the downside possibilities as well.

    2. Ginny Says:

      Succinctly and wisely put, AVI

    3. Jonathan Says:

      For many people this kind of knowledge is unambiguously beneficial. Two obvious examples are people whose known odds of having inherited serious disease are high, and people who were adopted. I knew a guy who died of colon cancer in his late forties. He had been adopted and knew nothing of his biological parents. I think that he would have gotten himself tested much earlier in life if DNA tests had been widely available, and that might have saved him.

    4. IGotBupkis, Legally Defined Cyberbully in All 57 States Says:

      This sort of thing, basically, ties to your own needs to know about things. I think, as suggested, the possibility of noting inherited risks is a good idea. But it’s not good if you also inherited a tendency towards hypochondria… :-D

    5. ErisGuy Says:

      Still, has anyone done this or similar ones?

      I have.

      How accurate, how useful, and how much does this (or do others) add to the cloud-knowledge of genes & disease?

      I have as yet no means to test the accuracy.
      Not useful.
      No idea if this adds to the cloud.

      I have had many requests from “fifth cousins” who seem to think fifth cousinhood is a close relationship and eagerly requesting all familial names to fill the space in the genealogy. That’s very funny.

      The highest disease index on my own test was 33%, but that declined with age, apparently, as when I entered my age, it dropped to 5%, which is not worth any worry.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.