Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Rolling Stone is Laughable on Hip Hop List

    Posted by Carl from Chicago on December 13th, 2012 (All posts by )

    From time to time I have to report out on the insanity of the Rolling Stones lists and their fixation with Bob Dylan, the sixties, and other obscurities. Here I had to revise their top guitarist list which was comically irrelevant, as well as their equally terrible top guitar songs list.

    While I know hardly anything about hip hop relative to my knowledge of rock everyone knows that putting Eminem on the cover is a gaffe in that community. Even Eminem himself would probably cringe at being the face of hip hop, when you have icons like Jay-Z, Tupac, Biggie, Snoop, Dr Dre, and Kanye. Sure he’s the best white rapper alive but really…

    Then onto the list. These songs are so old I even remember them.

    1. “The Message” by Grandmaster Flash from 1982

    2. “Rapper’s Delight” by Sugarhill Gang from 1979

    3. “Planet Rock” by Afrika Bambattaa from 1982

    4. “Sucker MC’s” by Run-DMC from 1983

    5. “Nuthin’ But a “G” Thang” by Dr. Dre and Snoop from 1992

    It is hilarious that Rolling Stone put their “musty test” to rap just like they do to rock (Bob Dylan) and guitar (Jimi Hendrix). They are really saying that those first four songs that are 30 years old or even older are the best hip hop songs? They are definitely old and were pioneers but that isn’t the best. Fine I’ll agree with #5 but the first four gotta go.

    Luckily the list is so laughably bad right from the top and with Eminem on the cover I don’t need to spend even five minutes thinking about it. This post basically wrote itself.

    Cross posted at LITGM

     

    6 Responses to “Rolling Stone is Laughable on Hip Hop List”

    1. Cris Says:

      Take it from someone who has spent some time on the subject. Rock and roll has some value, deserves some interest. It is, however, an appalling come down from the popular music of the 20s, 30s and 40s.
      Rap is simply garbage. At least one alumnus claims to have detected interesting syncopation, but I suspect he’s kidding.
      Don’t embarrass yourself with a similar posting in the future.
      Rolling Stone is still in print? Who buys such stuff? John Kerry?

    2. Alcibiades Says:

      Rap is not hip hop.

    3. Robert Schwartz Says:

      If rap is not hip hop what is hip hop? and, what is rap? what is the difference?

      I really don’t know as I have done my best to ignore all post rock genres of popular music.

    4. PenGun Says:

      Well Rap is a form of Hip Hop. I love Jazz and have an extensive collection. I love Rock and have an extensive collection. I love Hip Hop and have a slightly smaller collection than the other two.

      If you think any form of music is garbage you have little understanding and probably no taste.

    5. Will Says:

      Eminem is as culturally significant as say…Charlie Manson? I can never hear his “name” or see an image of his preposterous visage without being reminded of the “Triumph The Insult Comic” incident. Who could ever forget his dye-job being compared to the hair color of a Beagles nut-sack? Hip-hop and it’s rat-bastard, rotten-to-the core culture is all part o’ Hope y Change.

    6. Cris Says:

      Thanks, Alcibiades, for pointing out that rap is not the same as hip hop. I am also aware that horse sh*t differs somewhat from bull sh*t, and care just as little. And a hearty harrumph to you, too, Pen.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.