Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Hanson vs Hanson

    Posted by David Foster on February 14th, 2013 (All posts by )

    The Decline of America

    America’s Bright Future


    Both links via Common Sense & Wonder


    6 Responses to “Hanson vs Hanson”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      Maybe he wrote one piece in the morning and the other late in the evening.

    2. Mike Doughty Says:

      Politics vs. potential.

    3. Cris Says:

      2012 election hangover? One minute I would think, “We can’t lose.” The next minute, “We’re screwed.”
      Same now. A lot depends on the next few years as to whether things work themselves out here at home in an orderly, democratic manner or some people get pantsed.

    4. Subotai Bahadur Says:

      Much of Hanson’s optimism in “America’s Bright Future” is based on his citations of economic statistics compared to other countries. With all due respect, those figures are massaged to the point where they are as true as the scripted events on an MTV reality show.

      Unemployment is stated as artificially low, because they keep lowering the size of the labor force it is a fraction of by dropping the unemployed from the books. Or like today’s figures, not including several states and “estimating” their unemployment. Or use of “birth/death” estimates of undetected businesses created to boost reported employment. Every optimistic figure announced is revised later as being much worse.

      Real GDP is the raw GDP minus inflation. Inflation is measured by using a “basket” of prices for certain things. That basket has been changed administratively to reduce the weight of the costs of food and energy [been to a grocery store, a gas station, or opened an electric/gas bill lately?] and to increase the weight of housing costs [with home values collapsing] to factor in the equivalent of buying a home every month. Thus technically we have a fractional percentage increase in GDP monthly.

      But if you use the same standards as during the Bush 43 term, we have unemployment in the range of 14-16%, not the 7.9% claimed. Similarly our real inflation rate is 8-10%, which when subtracted from the GDP growth gives a negative number. For a long time. As in we are and have been in a depression masked by transfer payments and government statistical lies.

      Subotai Bahadur

    5. Michael Kennedy Says:

      My reaction to the column was, “Just think if Romney had won the election.”

      He didn’t and I can see a thousand ways Obama will kill this economy. Most of them are more likely than not.

    6. David Foster Says:

      Bookworm just attended a luncheon at which Hanson spoke about America’s future, and has a post here.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.