<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3777.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3777.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:28:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3777.html/comment-page-1#comment-28247</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/003777.html#comment-28247</guid>
		<description>Economics is a social science.  I find it doubtful that there is any such state as an equilibrium, or natural state, for that matter.  We&#039;re not mechanical systems.  Do you think econometricians will ever find a Grand Unified Theory of Economics?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economics is a social science.  I find it doubtful that there is any such state as an equilibrium, or natural state, for that matter.  We&#8217;re not mechanical systems.  Do you think econometricians will ever find a Grand Unified Theory of Economics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/3777.html/comment-page-1#comment-28246</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/003777.html#comment-28246</guid>
		<description>Back in the naive old days when people first started developing system theory it used to be an article of faith that all natural systems eventually found a stable point of equilibrium. It&#039;s now know that for a lot of systems the natural state is oscillation.

I&#039;ve long believed that oscillation is the natural state for free markets, and that&#039;s the underlying source of the boom/bust cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the naive old days when people first started developing system theory it used to be an article of faith that all natural systems eventually found a stable point of equilibrium. It&#8217;s now know that for a lot of systems the natural state is oscillation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve long believed that oscillation is the natural state for free markets, and that&#8217;s the underlying source of the boom/bust cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

