Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • “When a fly falls into a cup of coffee…”

    Posted by Jonathan on February 2nd, 2014 (All posts by )

    (Via The Augean Stables, The Jewish Chronicle Online and Free Republic. Original source unknown.)


    The Italian – throws the cup, breaks it, and walks away in a fit of rage.
    The German – carefully washes the cup, sterilizes it and makes a new cup of coffee.
    The Frenchman – takes out the fly, and drinks the coffee.
    The Chinese – eats the fly and throws away the coffee.
    The Russian – Drinks the coffee with the fly, since it was extra with no charge.
    The Israeli – sells the coffee to the Frenchman, sells the fly to the Chinese, sells the cup to the Italian, drinks a cup of tea, and uses the extra money to invent a device that prevents flies from falling into coffee.
    The Palestinian – blames the Israeli for the fly falling into his coffee, protests the act of aggression to the UN, takes a loan from the European Union to buy a new cup of coffee, uses the money to purchase explosives and then blows up the coffee house where the Italian, the Frenchman, the Chinese, the German and the Russian are all trying to explain to the Israeli that he should give away his cup of tea to the Palestinian…


    9 Responses to ““When a fly falls into a cup of coffee…””

    1. Michael Kennedy Says:

      Remember when Mao had everyone swatting flies ? Maybe flies are rare in China.

    2. pst314 Says:

      Meanwhile an Egyptian mullah explains through quotes from the Koran and Hadith that the fly is not a health hazard as long as one eats the entire fly, because according to Mohammed while one wing carries poison the other wing carries the antidote.

    3. pst314 Says:

      “Remember when Mao had everyone swatting flies?”

      I remember when he had everyone killing birds that eat flies and other pest–which made Jeff Spicoli seem a positive genius by comparison.

    4. Michael Kennedy Says:

      Yup, the sparrow campaign did the most harm. Another triumph of central planning .

      The campaign against the ‘Four Pests’ was initiated in 1958 as a hygiene campaign by Mao Zedong, who identified the need to exterminate mosquitoes, flies, rats, and sparrows. Sparrows – mainly the Eurasian Tree Sparrow[1][2] – were included on the list because they ate grain seeds, robbing the people of the fruits of their labour. The masses of China were mobilized to eradicate the birds, and citizens took to banging pots and pans or beating drums to scare the birds from landing, forcing them to fly until they fell from the sky in exhaustion. Sparrow nests were torn down, eggs were broken, and nestlings were killed.[1][3] Sparrows and other birds were shot down from the sky, resulting in the near-extinction of the birds in China.[4] Non-material rewards and recognition were offered to schools, work units and government agencies in accordance with the volume of pests they had killed.

      THe central planners were as brilliant as the Obamacare designers.

      By April 1960, Chinese leaders realized that sparrows ate a large amount of insects, as well as grains.[3][2] Rather than being increased, rice yields after the campaign were substantially decreased.[1][2] Mao ordered the end of the campaign against sparrows, replacing them with bed bugs in the ongoing campaign against the Four Pests.[3] By this time, however, it was too late. With no sparrows to eat them, locust populations ballooned, swarming the country and compounding the ecological problems already caused by the Great Leap Forward, including widespread deforestation and misuse of poisons and pesticides.[1] Ecological imbalance is credited with exacerbating the Great Chinese Famine, in which at least 20 million people died of starvation.

      I don’t think Obamacare will cause famine but I expect a lot more people without health insurance by fall.

      England has done a number on their birds with pet cats .

      Cats kill an estimated 55 million birds in Britain every year and such predation could be contributing to long-term declines of garden birds like House Sparrows.

    5. Michael Kennedy Says:

      More examples of central planning. These people are unteachable.

      On Thursday, the board announced its decision. The ban on treating men is gone, as is the requirement that members devote at least 75 percent of their practice to obstetrics and gynecology. Now, the board says members must devote “a majority” of their practice to the specialty.

      David Margulies, the head of a public relations firm and a spokesman for the board, said in an email that the threat of a lawsuit had nothing to do with the board’s decision, and that “the changes were in the works prior to correspondence from Mr. Curtis.”

      Imagine that. Without fools, most lawyers would starve. We seem to have a surfeit of both.

    6. Bill Brandt Says:

      Maybe it is my German heritage but I vote with the German although admire the Israeli for seeing opportunity

    7. Gringo Says:

      Heaven and Hell:

      Heaven is where the police are British,
      the chefs Italian,
      the mechanics[engineers] German,
      the lovers French,
      and it’s all organized by the Swiss.

      Hell is where the police are German,
      the chefs are British,
      the mechanics [engineers] French,
      the lovers Swiss,
      and it is all organized by the Italians.

      Heaven is an American house.
      Hell is a Japanese house.

      Heaven is a Japanese wife.
      Hell is an American wife.
      [told to me by a Chinese student.]

    8. renminbi Says:

      British police were once good,but from all the second-hand evidence have become close to worthless.

    9. Gringo Says:

      British police were once good,but from all the second-hand evidence have become close to worthless.

      From what I have read in recent years about British cops doing stuff like this: British cops won’t apologize for intimidating cafe owner into shutting off Bible video., I would have to agree with you.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.