Comments on: Sony’s Poor Awful Customer Service

By: Porridge

Porridge — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:43:21 +0000

Was googling for outlets to share my terrible Sony customer service experience and found your site - I've been chronicling my experience for 230 days here, if you're interested. -G.

By: John

John — Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:12:17 +0000

The XT is pretty small for a digital SLR, and it's quiet. But it does not do video. We also have a Sony Mavica, with which we've had some problems. But it's hard to discount Sony's Zeiss optics. None of the other non-film camera companies come close.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:35:53 +0000

Thanks, John. I had been holding off on digital cameras because the small ones are limited and the DSLRs are big and noisy. I bought the Sony mainly because I realized that I wanted video capability, which or course DSLRs do not have. In my brief use of it I found it to be great not only for video but also as a take-anywhere camera, particularly for bike rides, which is where I make a large proportion of my photos. I also found that the ability to get photos quickly onto my computer without laborious scanning was liberating. So while I will end up with a DSLR at some point, in the meantime a small camera is highly useful to me despite its limitations.

By: John

John — Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:12:07 +0000

My reommendation is to bite the bullet and buy a digital SLR from Nikon or Cannon (Cannons have fancier electronics and software, Nikons are more reliable). You can use SLR lenses that you might already have for a 35mm camera, which gives a lot more flexibility. My wife (the family photographer) has a Rebel from Cannon (also purchased from B&H), and she's been pleased with it. (She owned a Rebel and a more sophisticated EOS film camera before that). But if you own a Nikon film SLR, you might not want to re-invest in Cannon lenses.

By: econ

econ — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 13:57:00 +0000

Sunk costs.

I say, go one more round at most, then toss it. Your time is more valuable.

Consider it a freeway accident with Sony and you have a $500 deductible.

If you want a big zoom (12x) with stabilization, get the Pana FZ5. If you want a pocketable cam with good high ISO get the Fuji F11.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:03:45 +0000

Thanks! I’ve already paid most of the cost, monetary and otherwise, so I may as well send the thing back until they get it right.

Strange way to run a business.

By: Dan from Madison

Dan from Madison — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:25:22 +0000

Hrm. That is too steep to just forget about it and toss it. I would set my level at $250. Using it with fuzz or dust on it is unacceptable. And I enjoy your photoblog a lot and don’t want that either. Good luck! Looks like you are going to need it.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:29:47 +0000

Thanks, Dan. That’s a tough one. I spent about $400 including accessories. Alternatives? 1) Keep using it with spots, 2) send it back and hope it gets fixed, or 3) wash my hands of it and buy another camera. Simplest would be to keep using it as is, but the spots would bother me on sky photos. Buying another camera would mean spending more money, and by the time I finished researching and shopping I might have my current camera back anyway. I’m inclined to roll the dice and send it back again, since this time it goes to Sony’s in-house repair shop rather than a contractor. (Sony pays shipping, btw.) I’ll pack and send it when I get a chance.

One thing’s certain: I don’t intend to buy any more Sony products unless Sony’s service improves.

By: Dan from Madison

Dan from Madison — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:28:00 +0000

Jonathan,
I am interested to know how much you spent on the thing. I assume you are eating the freight each time plus the time spent boxing the piece of sh1t up plus pain and aggravation. Where I am going is if you spent a couple of hundred dollars maybe its time to just sh1tcan the thing and buy something else. Just a thought.