Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • 2014 Midwest Business & Markets Conference

    Posted by Zenpundit on March 9th, 2014 (All posts by )

    cross-posted to

    The Union League Club of Chicago Building

    Yesterday, I attended the 2014 Midwest Business & Markets Conference at the historic Union League Club of Chicago. While business conferences are far afield from my usual interests, the main draw for me was seeing Lexington Green speak about the book he co-authored with James C. Bennett, America 3.0


    Michael J. Lotus (“Lex”)                       His book

    Lex’s speech, which gave some highlights from the book and tried to explain why some of our economic doldrums are really birth pangs of a new world (while others are rentier gasps of the old) was excellent and well received, with a long Q& A session and folks in the audience buying copies of America 3.0.  This was far from the only intriguing talk. Carl Stumpf, speaking about “The Disruptive Cloud”  predicted virtually revolutionary changes in IT practices for society, business and government that will come from market forces driving adoption of cloud computing; venture capitalist and angel investor Jeff Carter outlined what Chicago needs to do to become a “self-sustaining ecosystem” of internet/tech business innovation; while Bethany McLean, Vanity Fair editor and author of The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron and All the Devils Are Here, delivered a rapid-fire discussion of journalism, the financial collapse of 2008, Enron and other subjects that was most informative.

    The best speaker, in the oratorical sense, was former gubernatorial candidate for governor, social conservative and WLS Radio personality Dan Proft whose lecture was “Gloom and Hope for the Illinois Economy”. Witty and sarcastic, Proft ably skewered Illinois politicians and politics, was something of a jackass on the subject of public education, deftly handled critical questions, was extremely blunt about the political shortcomings of the Illinois GOP and in general gave a “fire in the belly” presentation for political change.

    Aside from the speakers, the Union League Club is a superb venue for conferences and meetings. The food was excellent and the meeting room comfortable with an attentive staff. I further enjoyed getting to meet and speak to the large representation of bloggers from Chicago Boyz including site admin Jonathan, Carl from Chicago, Lexington Green (already an amigo) and conference organizer Dan from Madison during lunch and the cocktail hour.

    I predict bigger and better for 2015!


    9 Responses to “2014 Midwest Business & Markets Conference”

    1. Jonathan Says:

      Thanks, Mark. A pleasure to meet you and a first-class event.

    2. Lexington Green Says:

      Mark, thanks for this post.

      It was indeed a great event.

      Thanks to Dan and John and also John Golterman for organizing the conference.

      Jeff Carter’s talk was fascinating. Check out his blog, Points & Figures.

      I must disagree with you about Proft’s assessment of public education. I don’t recall disagreeing with any of it. But we can hash that out in another venue at some point.

    3. Lexington Green Says:

      Here is Jeff Carter’s post about the event.

      Check out the slides, especially the first one.

    4. Lexington Green Says:

      Actually, look at Jeff’s second slide:

      The overlap between ideas that seem stupid and good ideas is where you find good VC Investments.

      Is that overlap where you find good policy proposals in times of rapid change?

      Are the proposals Bennett and I make in America 3.0 in that overlapping zone? I say: yeah, baby.

    5. MikeK Says:

      This Jeff Carter post fits pretty well with the Deep State.

    6. Says:

      Hi Lex

      I disagree with Proft’s implicit generalization that CPS = “public education” though perhaps that comes from being a Chicago radio figure. Its fine if people wish to believe that but it is as accurate as implying all public schools are IMSA or New Trier. They aren’t.

      I could have gotten into it with with Proft but David already had a substantial amount of time engaging him critically on another topic and it would have been a debating points scoring kind of exchange rather than a dialogue (whether that would have been entertaining or annoying to the audience I’m not certain).

    7. pointsnfigures Says:

      @Lexington, maybe that’s a good idea. Policy ideas that seem stupid intersecting with good ideas make good policy!!

      School vouchers for example.

    8. Lexington Green Says:

      Mark, I can see your point. Dan was focusing his fire on CPS, which richly deserves it. You cannot generalize from CPS to everything else, though I am not sure he was doing that. Yes, the picture is varied around the state and the country. Still, CPS is an atrocity and needs root and branch transformation. Reform is not a strong enough word. As to a money-follows-the-child approach, schools like New Trier would remain mostly unchanged, since parents already like it and want to keep their kids there. They are already competitive. Probably, they would have increased application and be able to be more selective. In Chicago, introducing market power to parents and students and making competition possible will lead to improvements over the existing “school to prison pipeline.”

    9. Lexington Green Says:

      Jeff, you seem to have discovered a principle of more general application!

      I think that slide applies most powerfully in times of rapid change, in technology or politics (which lags technology) — when doing the “sensible thing” based on prior experience is in fact the wrong thing because the value of prior experience as a predictor is withering away.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.