Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Heroism in America, Then and Now

    Posted by David Foster on June 19th, 2014 (All posts by )

    Bookworm posts about America’s cultural journey from an age in which the heroism of Audie Murphy was widely recognized to one in which Bowie Bergdahl is referred to by a senior Administration official as having served with “honor and distinction.”  With references to George MacDonald Fraser’s excellent WWII memoir, Quartered Safe Out Here and thoughts about the Oprah-ization of America.

     

    5 Responses to “Heroism in America, Then and Now”

    1. MikeK Says:

      Key observation:

      “This realization meant that Leftists could no longer use demonizing the troops as an anti-War tactic. They had to come up with something else, and the therapeutic culture offers just what they needed: America’s troops were recast, not as citizen soldiers, but as soldier victims. Each and every one is a sensitive soul who is traumatized merely by donning the uniform, never mind actually having to fight, survive, and kill.”

      My father was very anti-Lew Ayres who wrecked his Hollywood career with a decision to be a conscientious objector in WWII.

      >i>He served as a First Aid instructor in the military before requesting a drop in rank in order to serve as a medic and chaplain’s assistant in the Pacific. He was one of 16 medics who arrived during the invasion of Leyte to set up evacuation hospitals under fire, and he there provided care to soldiers and civilians in the Philippines and New Guinea. He donated all the money he had earned as a serviceman to the American Red Cross.[5]

      This did him no good with most movie fans and I don’t think his career ever recovered although he did become a bit of a hero to the left when Vietnam came along. He did make some movies but was never a star again.

      John Kerry, a far worse liar and fantasist about US atrocities in Vietnam, is now Secretary of State and ran for president with quite a few votes.

      Times change, as the Bookworm said.

    2. Michael Hiteshew Says:

      >>Bowie Bergdahl is referred to by a senior Administration official as having served with “honor and distinction.”

      That is only because it serves their political ends to do so. He was used as a tool to achieve an end that was predetermined.

    3. ErisGuy Says:

      The future will marvel at a century and more of people allowing, encouraging, participating in the destruction of the clarity of their own language, the bureaucratization of their own language by factions determined to force their crackpot and crazy theories into action.

      The worst offenders are socialists; the second worst feminists. (But then, feminism’s most important founding mothers were Stalinists.)

    4. Grurray Says:

      I have and had a lot of older relatives that fought in World War II and Korea that I only knew later in their lives. Most of them until recently never liked to talk about the wars. You almost had to pry the information out.

      I’m not sure if you can apply my unscientific findings from my kinfolk to the entire generation, but the impression I got was generally the war was considered a different world with different emotions, attachments, behaviors, and expectations then civilian life. If you couldn’t make that transition then you just wouldn’t make it through, so you did. Period.

      When it was over, like those Cambodian women, they just wanted to get on with their lives. What happens at war stays at war. I always thought that Truman verbalized and exemplified this attitude when he famously told a guilty and remorseful Robert Oppenheimer that you just don’t go around bellyaching about it.

    5. renminbi Says:

      Thank-you very much for recommending “Quartered Safe Out Here”,which I picked up at my library. In his introduction Fraser properly skewers the inability of most of our current critics to understand anything at all because of their arrogant ignorance of history.

      I think we have gone wrong with the idea that making people sit in classrooms will put wisdom in their heads. The effect has been to keep people from assuming adult responsibilities rather than to create educated people.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.