Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Quote of the Day

    Posted by Jonathan on July 16th, 2014 (All posts by )

    Virginia Postrel:

    Higher education exists to advance and transmit knowledge, and learning requires disagreement and argument. Even the most vocational curriculum — accounting, physical therapy, civil engineering, graphic design — represents knowledge accumulated through trial and error, experimentation and criticism. That open-ended process isn’t easy and it often isn’t comfortable. The idea that students should be protected from disagreeable ideas is a profoundly anti-educational concept.

     

    9 Responses to “Quote of the Day”

    1. Bill Brandt Says:

      All too often opposing ideas are not presented these days

    2. dearieme Says:

      How very true: well said, Postrel.

    3. veryretired Says:

      If one sees a system in operation that is, in fact, accomplishing the exact opposite of what it claims to be doing, then the true purpose of that system is what it is doing, not what it claims to be doing.

      The educational system is a prime example. The justice system is another.

      Government programs consistently produce the opposite of that for which they are allegedly designed.

      Regardless of the (allegedly) well intentioned motives behind such schemes, it is fair to ask: If, after a century of repeated failures, each of which followed the same pattern of claiming a problem only the state could solve, designing a state program which would supposedly solve the problem, and then having the problem get progressively worse with each enlargement and expansion of the program(s) that were supposed to fix it, isn’t it long past time to reject the statist solution?

      If your well has gone dry, why keep lowering the bucket expecting water?

    4. MikeK Says:

      Solving a problem could put you out of business if that is your purpose. Bureaucrats understand this very well.

    5. TimL Says:

      Yet there’s this: http://freebeacon.com/culture/inside-brandeiss-anti-israel-listserv/

      I gave up on my alma mater (University of Wisconsin) when they offered a course on 9/11 trutherism. They are free to offer whatever they want, but as someone who was in Washington on 9/11, my money will not go to support garbage.

    6. Death 6 Says:

      VeryRetired,
      I assume that your words “progressively worse” was an intended pun. I like it and plan on using it every chance I get.

      Mike

    7. veryretired Says:

      D6—you are correct, and use it in good health.

    8. TimL Says:

      Another genius move at UW-Madison:

      http://www.mindingthecampus.com/2014/07/an-amazing-diversity-plan-at-madison/

      Grades by race and sex! Wonderful.

    9. MikeK Says:

      “Grades by race and sex! Wonderful.”

      I saw that, too. Do these people ever think about the fact that this twiddling of the dials devalues every genuine accomplishment of minority kids ? Did you notice this part ?

      including high-status special programs, high-demand majors,

      I wonder how many engineering and physics professors will cooperate ? Employers are watching this stuff. Microsoft already used tests in its employment process. Is that the answer ? Medical students have to take a USMLE. Next, engineers will have to do something similar.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.