Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • R E S P E C T

    Posted by Ginny on January 29th, 2007 (All posts by )

    Okay, as a fairly typical (if ex-) Nebraskan I have a passionate obsession with public buildings. Still, I suspect you don’t need to be me to find this story disturbing.

    I’m also a teacher at a school which is somewhat old fashioned in its attitude toward private property (its roots are in a rural, farming area; it is supported in part by county real estate taxes as well as state grants). Each semester I stand in front of my students and read a committee-written statement that requires the close reading they will need to do in an English course. I point that out. But I’ve come to respect the committee that wrote it because they clearly understood how important and widely affecting respect is.

    Members of the ____ College community, which includes faculty, staff and students, are expected to act honestly and responsibly in all aspects of campus life. _____ College holds all members accountable for their actions and words. Therefore, all members should commit themselves to behave in a manner that recognizes personal respect and demonstrates concern for the personal dignity, rights, and freedoms of every member of the College community, including respect for College property and the physical and intellectual property of others.

    Sure stealing the projectors from our rooms, copying your answers from the guy next to you, insulting your teachers or ad hominem arguments in student discussions, writing graffiti in the restrooms or spitting your gum out on the steps – these expressions of disrespect for others are so different we seem to be crossing a lot of ground here. But, in the end, they all demonstrate a lack of appropriate deference, a lack of respect. They make not only for a less civil campus but one concerned with trivia.
    So, I’m reminded of a blog entry to which Instapundit linked yesterday. It argues not for bipartisanship, but for respect:

    The solution to such hostility and divisiveness is not an empty call for bipartisanship. The solution is a call for a cup of respect and perhaps a lump of deference or humility.

    (Valkyrie of Disordered Thought.)

    Personally, I’ve never had much trouble with seeing flag burning as an example of free speech, though it always seemed pretty stupid, myopic, indeed, disrespectful. The flags people burned were, I figured, theirs. The capitol is not. The building belongs to all of us – and I can’t imagine anyone arguing that because it belongs to the collective us, it is free to be defaced by any one of us. Respect for institutions, for buildings, for others – our committee was right, they are all a part of one whole. And, in a democracy, this is another respect as well, self-respect.

    (What respect feels like.)


    3 Responses to “R E S P E C T”

    1. James A Pacella Says:

      I like this post a lot, Ginny, thanks.

      Indeed, I like the call for respect not bipartisanship. We Americans should show respect to one another no matter what our differences. I find it increasingly difficult to have any dialog with the Left (at least on line.. in person I’m not in enough situations that would permit honest political discussion)

      I perceive such a hostility yet almost total unseriousness to hash out ideas about the world we live. Even if you grant them their premises for the sake of argument they seem more interested in making sure you lose any and legitimacy than defending a positive position, it’s distressing.

      I’m with Newt Gingrich when he says we’re facing so many problems right now, this country is in the most dangerous predictment since the Civil War. We’re going to need the best and brightest as well as the everyday person to come together to face these challenges and come up with solutions that won’t be undermined by political opposition. I don’t see how that is possible, and a divided house cannot stand.

    2. ElGaboGringo Says:

      On the subject of the Civil War, is it worth mentioning that Democrats (so called “Peace Democrats” then, but now better known as Copperheads) at that time were involved in somewhat subversive actions, promoting Union defeats and encouraging and abetting the confederates, etc?

      The more things change…

    3. Robert Schwartz Says:


      I saw this on Book-TV a few weeks ago:

      Architecture of Democracy
      from December 30, 2006
      Architect Allan Greenberg discussed his book “Architecture of Democracy” with Witold Rybczynski, professor of urbanism and real estate at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. This event is part of a series of conversations on American architecture with prominent architects. Mr. Greenberg and Mr. Rybczynski analyzed the relationship between political ideals and America’s architectural tradition at an event co-sponsored by the Institute of Classical Architecture & Classical America and the General Society of Mechanics and Tradesmen.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.