*Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above (we claim no affiliation), and others who helped to liberalize Latin American economies.
 
 

 

Quote of the Day

Posted by Jonathan on October 10th, 2007 (All posts by Jonathan)

Print This Post Print This Post

Asian-American women have a life expectancy of almost 87 years; African-American men, 69 years. We have these facts on the authority of Eight Americas, a 2006 study by number crunchers at Harvard’s School of Public Health. Women in Stearns County, Minnesota, live about 22 years longer than men in southwest South Dakota, and 33 years longer than Native American men in six of that state’s counties. The gap between the highest and lowest life expectancies for U.S. race-county combinations is over 35 years. Some race-sex-county groups typically die in their nineties, others in their fifties. Some are healthier than the norm in Iceland, Europe, and Japan, others sicker than Nicaragua and Uzbekistan.

-Peter Huber

 

3 Responses to “Quote of the Day”

  1. Ginny Says:

    And then there’s the boy problem - A&L links to Scientific American.

  2. Don Says:

    And do they correlate the priority of education as an integral part of the family culture in each of the “Eight Americas”?

  3. Shannon Love Says:

    Difference in life expectancy between groups raises the question of whether Social security payouts should be the same. Everyone more or less works and therefor contributes for the same span but all do not live as long past retirement age. In effect, the short lived get a much lower rate of return than do the long lived. Since life expectancy maps onto various ethnic groups or other types of collections, it raises real issues of fairness for one-size-fits-all compulsory government programs.

    If Social Security were a Rightist program the Left would call it racist.

    Its another good reason to personalize retirement to some degree. That way, at least people who die younger as a group can at least leave something behind for their families. Now a person who pays into Social Security for 45 years and then dies unexpectedly at 64 leaves nothing to his family but someone who saves privately over the same period leaves a great deal.

Leave a Reply

HTML: You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs.

Content: You are welcome to comment here, whether you agree with us or not, as long as you are civil. However, we may edit or delete comments that are personally abusive, off-topic or very long. Also, in case it's not obvious, we are merely a small group of opinionated individuals, sharing a blog whose name is in part a humorous reference to The University of Chicago, which some of us attended. We are not responsible for the policies of George W. Bush, the Republicans, The University of Chicago, Milton Friedman, the Libertarian Party, neocons, Pinochet, the British monarchy or anyone else.

Disappearing Comments: Occasionally our spam filter snags a legitimate comment. If your comment does not appear immediately, please email so that we can rescue it. It might also be a good idea to keep a copy of any comment that you spent a long time writing, just in case.