Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Everybody Get On

    Posted by Dan from Madison on October 28th, 2007 (All posts by )

    Most people who have flown are familiar with the Southwest Airlines “cattle call”. For those who don’t know what it is, I will give a quick explanation.

    Southwest doesn’t give assigned seats for their flights, rather they issue a letter to you, A B or C. When you get to the gate, they simply say “group A get on” and that is what happens. Those who check in earlier receive the preferential section and therefore the best shot at getting those invaluable exit row seats. The problem with this was that people would begin lining up hours in advance of the flight. They had separate lines for the A, B and C sections. If you were in the rear of the section A people, there is no shot at the more valuable seats, but at least you could still get an aisle or window.


    Southwest has recently tweaked the boarding procedure a bit. They cancelled the idea of letting families board first, as a family who arrived just as the plane was getting ready to board the A section could have their choice of seats first and that caused heartburn with the people who stood in the A line for an hour. There have been a few other tweaks as of late that are explained pretty well here.

    I was really surprised when I flew to Portland (from Madison, WI) last week and saw that Northwest had altered its boarding procedure. It isn’t perfect but it is better than what it was. As an aside, I really had no choice but to fly Northwest out of Madison to Portland. We went through Minneapolis (a beautiful airport). For once my flights went pretty well – next week I go to Oklahoma, and we will see what happens there.

    So we still all have assigned seats on these Northwest flights. There are, I believe, three pre boarding calls. Those who need extra time such as families and the elderly, then first class, then those who are Elite members or whatever their frequent flyer club is called. These went pretty quick, then they just said “everybody else, get on”. I was totally surprised that it only took an airline 15 years of seeing Southwest eat their lunch on a daily basis for them to make the change. As most of you remember the other airlines always boarded their planes from the rear up to the front.

    In addition to this, they started boarding the plane far ahead of when they used to. For a 6.40 flight, we started boarding at 6.00. After just five minutes of pre boarding (thats all three calls – extra time, first class and elite members) that left 35 minutes for everybody else to get on. I timed it – the vast majority of passengers were boarded in just 20 minutes. The only things that really held up the action were those who were too stupid to understand exactly which seat was theirs or those who had carry on luggage that was too large for the overheads. The plane from Minneapolis to Portland was very large too – three seats on each side and approx. 40 rows deep.

    Well, I think Northwest will continue this experiment as it seems that it worked out alright. I still hate flying and will do anything I can to avoid it, but any little improvement helps.

    *I would be interested to hear from Chicago Boyz readers if the airlines that they use have improved or declined in service as of late.

    Cross posted at LITGM.

     

    3 Responses to “Everybody Get On”

    1. Carl from Chicago Says:

      This sounds like a big improvement. I have flown more recently (used to be a road warrior) and they have very complicated boarding groups in United; basically 5-6 groups. I don’t know what all this complexity accomplishes – they still seem like chaos and it takes about the same amount of time to board the aircraft.

    2. Shannon Love Says:

      I haven’t flown in the past few years but I used to love to fly Southwest because their no frills, no bullsh*t approach appealed to me a deep aesthetic level. Get on the plane, here’s your peanuts, get the hell off the plane. Wam-bam thank you mam never felt so good.

      The entire point of flying is to get from point A to point B quickly and Southwest really seems to have engineered that concept deep into their institutional culture. Other airlines by comparison seemed mired in an era when flying conveyed social status and passengers expected to be treated like first class fops on the Titanic. Its almost as if they built their systems around the idea that, “Its not the destination, its the journey.”

      I confess that I am not sure I would fly Southwest on vacation. I might be welling to spend a bit more on easing myself into a relaxing mindset as I flew to my vacation spot. But when it comes down to getting from point A to point B I don’t think Southwest’s model can be beat.

    3. Don Says:

      Two points.

      Years ago before MSM completely tanked, I watched the CEO of SWA on 60 minutes who explained he competed with the bus company not other airlines. Explains a lot.

      And

      Who in the world came up with ‘pre-boarding’? Either you are boarding or you’re not. Someone is getting on, so how can it be ‘pre’?

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.