Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 

 
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Contributors:

  •   Please send any comments or suggestions about the book that Lexington Green and James C. Bennett are currently writing to:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links

  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...

  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • «
    »

    Small, High-Velocity Dogs

    Posted by Jonathan on January 23rd, 2008 (All posts by Jonathan)

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Post to Twitter Tweet This Post


     
    (Click image for larger.)
     

     

    This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008 at 1:42 am and is filed under Photos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    13 Responses to “Small, High-Velocity Dogs”

    1. Robert Schwartz Says:
      January 23rd, 2008 at 9:04 am

      I don’t get it.

    2. James R. Rummel Says:
      January 23rd, 2008 at 9:14 pm

      I don’t get it, either.

      Is that urine stains caused by a pack of small dogs? But then why the High-Velocity label?

      Or is it a grease spot caused by a group of small dogs that died when they fell from a height?

      Please explain. It’s driving me mad with worry over the dogs!

      James

    3. Jonathan Says:
      January 23rd, 2008 at 9:42 pm

      Just look at the picture. The dogs are there.

    4. Jonathan Says:
      January 23rd, 2008 at 9:45 pm

      The woman is looking at one of them.

    5. Sgt. Mom Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 9:04 am

      I would guess that the two pairs of parallel streaks (one tanish, one dark-brownish) that the women appear to be looking at, are the dogs – moving so very fast that they appear as as a blurr.

      In two places, so they are moving very fast.

    6. Jonathan Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 9:19 am

      Yes. I thought it would be obvious, but apparently it’s only clear to me.

      Those dogs were like subatomic particles.

    7. Robert Schwartz Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 11:25 am

      I still don’t see anything. Now, I am getting older, but I do have a 19in. 1280×1024 Samsung monitor. Maybe if you put up a higher definition jpg. Even the enlarged version is only 85 KB. Or maybe its just all the years that Rummel and I have spent in Central Ohio.

    8. Jonathan Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

      It might be your monitor but I think it’s probably the way you are looking. It would have been clearer without the wet areas on the patio. Look closely and you will see the dogs and their shadows.

    9. Tatyana Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 4:19 pm

      I too can’t see no dogs nor their shadows.
      I thought this is some sort of illustration on Alice in Wonderland, that time she got teeny-tiny – and maybe saw still tinier dogs, so small they imperceptible to our eyes? Anyway, I guess this picture now could be sent to a contempo-art gallery, as it seems to be provided with numerous and unconnected captions.

    10. Phil Fraering Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 5:06 pm

      Now that I know what to look for they’re visible.

      But it’s hard to pick them out against all the dirt and puddles and whatnot on the floor.

    11. Jonathan Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    12. Robert Schwartz Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 5:41 pm

      Oh. Those are doogs. I thought they were schmutz.

    13. Tatyana Says:
      January 24th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

      I thought it’s some wet tire tracks. Of two BMXes jumping. Simultaneously.

    «
    »