<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Primaries in Ohio and Texas (or so I understand &#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McTernan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-195751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McTernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-195751</guid>
		<description>Robert...
  This &quot;plan&quot; has an eternity to jump the tracks.If there&#039;s one thing I learned in Chess, if you get a chance to take the queen without a checkmate than you take it because it probably won&#039;t come again.  Who cares about starting a food fight if you can simply win the game?  
 
1.  If Hillary&#039;s campaign ended last night, no one would ever take a future bid by her again because her campaign would rightfully be remembered as a complete trainwreck.  Now she is one of the greatest turnaround magicians in political history.  (Look at it another way: Who would recommend that Rudy, Fred, or Howard Dean run in 2012?) 
 
2.a. If HWMNBMN were the presumptive nominee, all the dirty laundry would still be coming out, and a massive case of &quot;buyer&#039;s remorse&quot; among the more practical democrats would be setting in AFTER it would be EXTREMELY difficult for the party elites to deny him the superdelegates without sending his less critical followers into a party ending conniption.  It is safe to say that nobody in the DNC would be too hot about supporting a loser for a second time in 2012.

(superdelegates which either candidate has mathematically required for weeks, BTW)

2.b. If HWMNBMN was the presumptive nominee, Hillary would eventually be dragged from the spotlight and a news vacuum would set in.  What would fill that vacuum over the long slow news weeks of summer?  PATRICK FITZGERALD&#039;s Prosecution of the Democratic Candidate&#039;s patron and mentor.  Not even the MSM would miss that opportunitity.

3. I think Hillary will now win the nomination.  As I understand it, she will do well in PA and will carry Puerto Rico, which as I understand it is a WINNER TAKE ALL primary that has far more delegates than the next several contests combined.

4. People hate Hillary.  But about 50% of the people hate the people that hate Hillary.  It could have been a blowout between an acceptable candidate and a candidate that a majority of Americans would have seen as an unacceptable one.  Now it will probably be a contest between Red &amp; Blue again, and that&#039;s not good considering the mood right now.

5. Even if Barack could win, a twit which reminds Americans of why they hate liberals would be infinitely preferable to a hardcore socialist that would actively pursue an agenda to dismantle capitalism.  That alone justifies defeating her when we got the chance.  Hillary said it best this morning: &quot;Be careful what you wish for, Rush.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert&#8230;<br />
  This &#8220;plan&#8221; has an eternity to jump the tracks.If there&#8217;s one thing I learned in Chess, if you get a chance to take the queen without a checkmate than you take it because it probably won&#8217;t come again.  Who cares about starting a food fight if you can simply win the game?  </p>
<p>1.  If Hillary&#8217;s campaign ended last night, no one would ever take a future bid by her again because her campaign would rightfully be remembered as a complete trainwreck.  Now she is one of the greatest turnaround magicians in political history.  (Look at it another way: Who would recommend that Rudy, Fred, or Howard Dean run in 2012?) </p>
<p>2.a. If HWMNBMN were the presumptive nominee, all the dirty laundry would still be coming out, and a massive case of &#8220;buyer&#8217;s remorse&#8221; among the more practical democrats would be setting in AFTER it would be EXTREMELY difficult for the party elites to deny him the superdelegates without sending his less critical followers into a party ending conniption.  It is safe to say that nobody in the DNC would be too hot about supporting a loser for a second time in 2012.</p>
<p>(superdelegates which either candidate has mathematically required for weeks, BTW)</p>
<p>2.b. If HWMNBMN was the presumptive nominee, Hillary would eventually be dragged from the spotlight and a news vacuum would set in.  What would fill that vacuum over the long slow news weeks of summer?  PATRICK FITZGERALD&#8217;s Prosecution of the Democratic Candidate&#8217;s patron and mentor.  Not even the MSM would miss that opportunitity.</p>
<p>3. I think Hillary will now win the nomination.  As I understand it, she will do well in PA and will carry Puerto Rico, which as I understand it is a WINNER TAKE ALL primary that has far more delegates than the next several contests combined.</p>
<p>4. People hate Hillary.  But about 50% of the people hate the people that hate Hillary.  It could have been a blowout between an acceptable candidate and a candidate that a majority of Americans would have seen as an unacceptable one.  Now it will probably be a contest between Red &amp; Blue again, and that&#8217;s not good considering the mood right now.</p>
<p>5. Even if Barack could win, a twit which reminds Americans of why they hate liberals would be infinitely preferable to a hardcore socialist that would actively pursue an agenda to dismantle capitalism.  That alone justifies defeating her when we got the chance.  Hillary said it best this morning: &#8220;Be careful what you wish for, Rush.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-195442</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-195442</guid>
		<description>Mark: untie the knots in your small clothes. Things are working according to plan.

One of 2 things will happen. Hillbilly may yet snatch the prize from He Who Must Not Be Middle Named, even though HWMNBNM will have more popularly chosen delegates and more popular votes.

In order to take the prize, Hillbilly will have to torture the ex-officio delegates, and conduct inside baseball moves to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations. The most likely result of that would be that HWMNBNM&#039;s supporters will believe that they have been cheated out of their chance to enter the Kingdom. They will p-oed and dispirited. She will face November without being able to count on a large turnout from the Democrat party&#039;s most loyal voters, and the kids will go back to school in the fall and return to their customary drunken stupors.

OTOH, if HWMNBNM is the nominee, he will have to be out in public making speeches and defending himself for months, not weeks. He will look less like the messiah, and more like what he is, an inexperienced hack politician from Chicago. By November, most of the people who fell for him in February will be thinking about chewing off their legs to escape the trap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: untie the knots in your small clothes. Things are working according to plan.</p>
<p>One of 2 things will happen. Hillbilly may yet snatch the prize from He Who Must Not Be Middle Named, even though HWMNBNM will have more popularly chosen delegates and more popular votes.</p>
<p>In order to take the prize, Hillbilly will have to torture the ex-officio delegates, and conduct inside baseball moves to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations. The most likely result of that would be that HWMNBNM&#8217;s supporters will believe that they have been cheated out of their chance to enter the Kingdom. They will p-oed and dispirited. She will face November without being able to count on a large turnout from the Democrat party&#8217;s most loyal voters, and the kids will go back to school in the fall and return to their customary drunken stupors.</p>
<p>OTOH, if HWMNBNM is the nominee, he will have to be out in public making speeches and defending himself for months, not weeks. He will look less like the messiah, and more like what he is, an inexperienced hack politician from Chicago. By November, most of the people who fell for him in February will be thinking about chewing off their legs to escape the trap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-195429</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-195429</guid>
		<description>Way to go geniuses.  Ditto head&#039;s everywhere listened to Rush&#039;s bone-headed idea and helped save a political cockroach team for the general.

If we had beat her tonight it would have been game over for the Clinton comeback forever, and we would have had a total lightweight for an opponent that would have folded like a cheap suit.  (See the &quot;8 questions&quot; press conf?)  Who would take a chance on Hillary ever again if her campaign ended tonight?  

Now she has the momentum, Barack will get more scrutiny, and idiots like Hannity have &quot;educated&quot; the dems on the alarming weakness of Obama RIGHT BEFORE THEY WERE ABOUT TO SEAL THE DEAL.    And since Barack will probably NOT be the nominee, he has been spared a humiliating, career-ending loss in November.

AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGG!!!!! 

All you instant Hillary voters should pat yourselves on the back, because you saved both of their political careers tonight, and now McCain will actually have to run against a candidate that can win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go geniuses.  Ditto head&#8217;s everywhere listened to Rush&#8217;s bone-headed idea and helped save a political cockroach team for the general.</p>
<p>If we had beat her tonight it would have been game over for the Clinton comeback forever, and we would have had a total lightweight for an opponent that would have folded like a cheap suit.  (See the &#8220;8 questions&#8221; press conf?)  Who would take a chance on Hillary ever again if her campaign ended tonight?  </p>
<p>Now she has the momentum, Barack will get more scrutiny, and idiots like Hannity have &#8220;educated&#8221; the dems on the alarming weakness of Obama RIGHT BEFORE THEY WERE ABOUT TO SEAL THE DEAL.    And since Barack will probably NOT be the nominee, he has been spared a humiliating, career-ending loss in November.</p>
<p>AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGG!!!!! </p>
<p>All you instant Hillary voters should pat yourselves on the back, because you saved both of their political careers tonight, and now McCain will actually have to run against a candidate that can win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Bill Ohio</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-195148</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Bill Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-195148</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t ask for a Dem ballot, although I am tempted. If I did, I couldn&#039;t vote for the Republican county office holders and state and Congressional Reps. They have more immediate impact on me and mine than the Prez. If you aren&#039;t a Republican in my county you might as well not run at all, meaning that the winner of the primary in many cases will be the office holder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t ask for a Dem ballot, although I am tempted. If I did, I couldn&#8217;t vote for the Republican county office holders and state and Congressional Reps. They have more immediate impact on me and mine than the Prez. If you aren&#8217;t a Republican in my county you might as well not run at all, meaning that the winner of the primary in many cases will be the office holder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194833</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194833</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve really considered voting for Senator Clinton cause Senator Obama is just horrifyingly bad.  But at the same time, Senator Clinton is only slightly less horrifying (unless it comes to healthcare, in which case she&#039;s the worst).

I&#039;m terribly torn between voting for Hillary and then going back for the caucus or, because I swing libertarian, voting (grudgingly) for Mr. Ron Paul to send a message to the Republican party that libertarians are indeed an honest to God part of the Republican coalition.

Decisions, decisions, and only four and a half hours to make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve really considered voting for Senator Clinton cause Senator Obama is just horrifyingly bad.  But at the same time, Senator Clinton is only slightly less horrifying (unless it comes to healthcare, in which case she&#8217;s the worst).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m terribly torn between voting for Hillary and then going back for the caucus or, because I swing libertarian, voting (grudgingly) for Mr. Ron Paul to send a message to the Republican party that libertarians are indeed an honest to God part of the Republican coalition.</p>
<p>Decisions, decisions, and only four and a half hours to make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cd</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194669</link>
		<dc:creator>cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194669</guid>
		<description>This is a repugnant tactic and one that, while technically legit, violates the spirit of democracy.

The problem with voting for Hillary is this: in this year, the circumstances favor the Democratic candidate winning.  And Hillary is by far and away the worst candidate.  Regardless of policies, her and her husband&#039;s  endless corruption are a threat.  

And she would rip this country apart.  Hillary is a threat that needs to be ended as soon as possible, in any way possible.  The risk is too great to attempt to perpetuate her candidacy.

Let&#039;s get real: It is entirely arrogant to believe that you can control circumstances to this degree.  

As a lifelong Republican, I am appalled at your suggestion, and if this becomes some sort of installed strategy in the party, I will leave the party for good.  Trust me when I say that this tactic turns off a lot of people and you only marginalize yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a repugnant tactic and one that, while technically legit, violates the spirit of democracy.</p>
<p>The problem with voting for Hillary is this: in this year, the circumstances favor the Democratic candidate winning.  And Hillary is by far and away the worst candidate.  Regardless of policies, her and her husband&#8217;s  endless corruption are a threat.  </p>
<p>And she would rip this country apart.  Hillary is a threat that needs to be ended as soon as possible, in any way possible.  The risk is too great to attempt to perpetuate her candidacy.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get real: It is entirely arrogant to believe that you can control circumstances to this degree.  </p>
<p>As a lifelong Republican, I am appalled at your suggestion, and if this becomes some sort of installed strategy in the party, I will leave the party for good.  Trust me when I say that this tactic turns off a lot of people and you only marginalize yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194413</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194413</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mr. Zug Says: John Lynch is correct.&quot;

All you have to do is ask for a Democrat ballot when you get to the polling place. You will be listed a D on the rolls until the next time. You could probably change at the BoE later, if it bothers you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mr. Zug Says: John Lynch is correct.&#8221;</p>
<p>All you have to do is ask for a Democrat ballot when you get to the polling place. You will be listed a D on the rolls until the next time. You could probably change at the BoE later, if it bothers you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194407</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194407</guid>
		<description>E-mails to my friends here in Ohio.

Tomorrow, I intend to go to the polls, ask for a Democrat ballot, and vote for Hillary Clinton. It will be very painful, but my duty to God and Country requires it.

Hillary needs a big win in Ohio to stay in the campaign. If she stays in the campaign, she and ****** will continue to slag each other and will be forced to spend their money on ads attacking each other. Their respective supporters will be more entrenched and more likely to be embittered when their candidate is eliminated at the convention. It also raises the likelihood that the Clintons will resort to divisive tactics and over the top arm twisting to attempt to secure the nomination for her.

Furthermore the entertainment of watching the Clintons whine about the biased media is just too good to miss.

I urge all of you who can vote in Ohio to do likewise.

I should make it clear. I abhor Hillary, and I think that ****** is a hard line anti-American leftist.

I just want to keep the pot boiling.

****** He, whose middle name may not be mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-mails to my friends here in Ohio.</p>
<p>Tomorrow, I intend to go to the polls, ask for a Democrat ballot, and vote for Hillary Clinton. It will be very painful, but my duty to God and Country requires it.</p>
<p>Hillary needs a big win in Ohio to stay in the campaign. If she stays in the campaign, she and ****** will continue to slag each other and will be forced to spend their money on ads attacking each other. Their respective supporters will be more entrenched and more likely to be embittered when their candidate is eliminated at the convention. It also raises the likelihood that the Clintons will resort to divisive tactics and over the top arm twisting to attempt to secure the nomination for her.</p>
<p>Furthermore the entertainment of watching the Clintons whine about the biased media is just too good to miss.</p>
<p>I urge all of you who can vote in Ohio to do likewise.</p>
<p>I should make it clear. I abhor Hillary, and I think that ****** is a hard line anti-American leftist.</p>
<p>I just want to keep the pot boiling.</p>
<p>****** He, whose middle name may not be mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194390</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Republican who voted for Hillary in the Texas primary last week (early voting) and plan to vote for her again in the caucus on Tuesday evening.  I don&#039;t believe that Hillary could ever get anything done if she was elected while Obama might bring expensive change.  Sometimes gridlock is good.  Also, imagine how crushed Obama supporters would be if he lost.  It would be good if a new generation of leftists decided to stay home in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Republican who voted for Hillary in the Texas primary last week (early voting) and plan to vote for her again in the caucus on Tuesday evening.  I don&#8217;t believe that Hillary could ever get anything done if she was elected while Obama might bring expensive change.  Sometimes gridlock is good.  Also, imagine how crushed Obama supporters would be if he lost.  It would be good if a new generation of leftists decided to stay home in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Gizzip</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Gizzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194388</guid>
		<description>While many people are contemplating &quot;jumping ship&quot; to vote for Hillary Rodent Anti-Christ over the Obamanation consider that such an action renders you unable to vote for other Primary candidates in your preferred party.

For example, my Congress-critter has some stiff competition from another Republican.  If I were to take a Democrat ballot I wouldn&#039;t be able to help my local candidate win the nomination.

Remember folks, there&#039;s more to this election than just POTUS.  We&#039;re also electing 435 Representatives and 33 or 34 Senators.  Many of them may need help in the Primaries too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many people are contemplating &#8220;jumping ship&#8221; to vote for Hillary Rodent Anti-Christ over the Obamanation consider that such an action renders you unable to vote for other Primary candidates in your preferred party.</p>
<p>For example, my Congress-critter has some stiff competition from another Republican.  If I were to take a Democrat ballot I wouldn&#8217;t be able to help my local candidate win the nomination.</p>
<p>Remember folks, there&#8217;s more to this election than just POTUS.  We&#8217;re also electing 435 Representatives and 33 or 34 Senators.  Many of them may need help in the Primaries too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194384</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194384</guid>
		<description>While I like the idea of watching them bash each other for another 5 months, the thought of Hillary having a chance at getting back into the White House terrifies me.

Finish Hillary now that she&#039;s down and be done with it.  I beg you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I like the idea of watching them bash each other for another 5 months, the thought of Hillary having a chance at getting back into the White House terrifies me.</p>
<p>Finish Hillary now that she&#8217;s down and be done with it.  I beg you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trader-DFW</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194383</link>
		<dc:creator>Trader-DFW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194383</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I suggest that any GOP voter in TX or OH take a Democrat ballot and vote for Hillary.&lt;/i&gt;

No! You should NOT suggest that. Sen. Cornyn has a Republican challenger and anything that prevents him from winning the primary and unseating that RINO pinhead would be a disaster. IMHO.

Trader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I suggest that any GOP voter in TX or OH take a Democrat ballot and vote for Hillary.</i></p>
<p>No! You should NOT suggest that. Sen. Cornyn has a Republican challenger and anything that prevents him from winning the primary and unseating that RINO pinhead would be a disaster. IMHO.</p>
<p>Trader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark L</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194368</guid>
		<description>Any Republican in Texas&#039;s 14th Congressional District is foregoing an opportunity to choose their next US Representative if they vote in the Democratic primary.  Chris Peden is challenging Ron Paul for that seat.

If you want an absentee representative that votes with Nancy Pelosi on the Global War On Terror, and talks controling spending without delivering results, your choice is Paul.  In that case, feel free to vote for Clinton or Obama.  

If you prefer a representative that will show up, vote with the Republicans on the GWOT, and actually has succeeded in cutting taxes and governmental spending, you want to vote for Peden.  Please don&#039;t waste your vote in a Democratic primary where it makes no substative difference anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any Republican in Texas&#8217;s 14th Congressional District is foregoing an opportunity to choose their next US Representative if they vote in the Democratic primary.  Chris Peden is challenging Ron Paul for that seat.</p>
<p>If you want an absentee representative that votes with Nancy Pelosi on the Global War On Terror, and talks controling spending without delivering results, your choice is Paul.  In that case, feel free to vote for Clinton or Obama.  </p>
<p>If you prefer a representative that will show up, vote with the Republicans on the GWOT, and actually has succeeded in cutting taxes and governmental spending, you want to vote for Peden.  Please don&#8217;t waste your vote in a Democratic primary where it makes no substative difference anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McTernan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McTernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194366</guid>
		<description>This is a horrible idea.  If she wins Texas and/or Ohio she&#039;s still in it and has a solid case for the superdelegates on the grounds of electability.  Hillary will be a much stronger candidate in the general and will be practically obliged to pick Barack as her VP (a formidable ticket).  

In contrast, Obama will be a disaster for the dems in the general.  5/6ths of the electorate will realize that 1/6 of the electorate has picked an ultra leftist liberal from a corrupt Dem machine with no practical experience.  Another 1/6th (the Hillary dems) will scream &quot;I told you so&quot; as the wheels come off in the fall.

In the general, the other 2/3rds will expect Obama to stake out policy positions he has largely been able to avoid because Hillary can&#039;t challenge him on any of them.  [Many of the 1/6 that voted for Barack because he&#039;s a rorschach for &quot;he agrees with me&quot; won&#039;t be too happy with the answers either.]  

Consider the list of issues she can&#039;t make an issue of:
Corruption: &quot;Paging Mrs. Pot.&quot;  Consorting with radical bombers: FLN pardons.  Spending: see HillaryCare(tm).  Immigration:  He&#039;s on the side that brings more votes in the primary.  Radical black church:  a third rail for dems.  Pushing Obama to clarify a time certain withdrawal:  &quot;What about your dissembling on a plan, Hillary?&quot;  NAFTA blatent pandering: &quot;I voted for it before I was against it.&quot;  &lt;b&gt;This is why Obama has gotten a pass.&lt;/b&gt;

John McCain will not be so constrained, and you can expect to see more like &quot;They&#039;re called Al Qaeda in Iraq&quot; and brutal CBC call outs, because he&#039;s a lightweight, and the truth will out.  By november the bloom will be off the rose and he&#039;ll look like just another scumbag poll who has and will say anything to get elected.  McCain may be a jerk, but people won&#039;t wonder about his experience, what he really thinks.

&lt;b&gt;Be smart:  Drive a stake through the dread queen while the press still hates her.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a horrible idea.  If she wins Texas and/or Ohio she&#8217;s still in it and has a solid case for the superdelegates on the grounds of electability.  Hillary will be a much stronger candidate in the general and will be practically obliged to pick Barack as her VP (a formidable ticket).  </p>
<p>In contrast, Obama will be a disaster for the dems in the general.  5/6ths of the electorate will realize that 1/6 of the electorate has picked an ultra leftist liberal from a corrupt Dem machine with no practical experience.  Another 1/6th (the Hillary dems) will scream &#8220;I told you so&#8221; as the wheels come off in the fall.</p>
<p>In the general, the other 2/3rds will expect Obama to stake out policy positions he has largely been able to avoid because Hillary can&#8217;t challenge him on any of them.  [Many of the 1/6 that voted for Barack because he's a rorschach for "he agrees with me" won't be too happy with the answers either.]  </p>
<p>Consider the list of issues she can&#8217;t make an issue of:<br />
Corruption: &#8220;Paging Mrs. Pot.&#8221;  Consorting with radical bombers: FLN pardons.  Spending: see HillaryCare(tm).  Immigration:  He&#8217;s on the side that brings more votes in the primary.  Radical black church:  a third rail for dems.  Pushing Obama to clarify a time certain withdrawal:  &#8220;What about your dissembling on a plan, Hillary?&#8221;  NAFTA blatent pandering: &#8220;I voted for it before I was against it.&#8221;  <b>This is why Obama has gotten a pass.</b></p>
<p>John McCain will not be so constrained, and you can expect to see more like &#8220;They&#8217;re called Al Qaeda in Iraq&#8221; and brutal CBC call outs, because he&#8217;s a lightweight, and the truth will out.  By november the bloom will be off the rose and he&#8217;ll look like just another scumbag poll who has and will say anything to get elected.  McCain may be a jerk, but people won&#8217;t wonder about his experience, what he really thinks.</p>
<p><b>Be smart:  Drive a stake through the dread queen while the press still hates her.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Zug</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Zug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194354</guid>
		<description>John Lynch is correct. In Ohio, a registered Republican would have to switch parties in order to obtain a Democrat ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Lynch is correct. In Ohio, a registered Republican would have to switch parties in order to obtain a Democrat ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim in Texas</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194353</guid>
		<description>Well, beside being kinda tacky and unbecoming there are down ballot candidates that need support and some of those races in parts of Texas are pretty important. In addition, in those Democrat controlled counties a skewed vote by dissaffected Republicans will perpetuate the Democrat power base in those counties.

I&#039;m one registered Republican who certainly won&#039;t be voting for either Obama or Hillary because, for no other reason, I&#039;m terrified that I might wind up with either as president</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, beside being kinda tacky and unbecoming there are down ballot candidates that need support and some of those races in parts of Texas are pretty important. In addition, in those Democrat controlled counties a skewed vote by dissaffected Republicans will perpetuate the Democrat power base in those counties.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one registered Republican who certainly won&#8217;t be voting for either Obama or Hillary because, for no other reason, I&#8217;m terrified that I might wind up with either as president</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194352</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194352</guid>
		<description>There is a long history in the state of Texas of cross over voters looking beyond the immediate candidate to the general election.  I can recall my father in the early 1960s taking my Mother to the polls to vote against Ralph Yarbourgh.   I had been planning for a long time to vote for Hillary.  The only trouble is that she is held in such low esteem by conservative Texans that I suspect that a great many will be voting for Obama just to stomp on her when she is down.

A co-worker who lives in Sugarland in Tom Delay&#039;s old district said that although he voted early ballot in the Republican Primary.  (there are number of candidates trying to run for that old seat that was stolen for the Dems) he was surprised at the huge line to vote Dem in a normally heavily Republican district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a long history in the state of Texas of cross over voters looking beyond the immediate candidate to the general election.  I can recall my father in the early 1960s taking my Mother to the polls to vote against Ralph Yarbourgh.   I had been planning for a long time to vote for Hillary.  The only trouble is that she is held in such low esteem by conservative Texans that I suspect that a great many will be voting for Obama just to stomp on her when she is down.</p>
<p>A co-worker who lives in Sugarland in Tom Delay&#8217;s old district said that although he voted early ballot in the Republican Primary.  (there are number of candidates trying to run for that old seat that was stolen for the Dems) he was surprised at the huge line to vote Dem in a normally heavily Republican district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194351</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in Texas and have decided to vote for Hillary.  The only downside I see to this is it will give the Rush Limbaughs more ammo to use against McCain.  They can say &quot;See?  A conservative state won&#039;t vote for McCain&quot;.  I won&#039;t do it only to cause trouble for the democrat party, but because the thought of Obama as president scares me more than Hillary as President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Texas and have decided to vote for Hillary.  The only downside I see to this is it will give the Rush Limbaughs more ammo to use against McCain.  They can say &#8220;See?  A conservative state won&#8217;t vote for McCain&#8221;.  I won&#8217;t do it only to cause trouble for the democrat party, but because the thought of Obama as president scares me more than Hillary as President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwoDogs</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194348</link>
		<dc:creator>TwoDogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Ron B.  If we _must_ have a Dem for President, I&#039;d rather it be Hill with all her flaws than that limp-dicked gasbag Obama. And I also think she&#039;ll be easier for McCain to beat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Ron B.  If we _must_ have a Dem for President, I&#8217;d rather it be Hill with all her flaws than that limp-dicked gasbag Obama. And I also think she&#8217;ll be easier for McCain to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tkelly</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html/comment-page-1#comment-194347</link>
		<dc:creator>tkelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5608.html#comment-194347</guid>
		<description>My wife and I are both going to vote her in Texas tomorrow for a candidate we hate, Hillary Clinton. We hate Obama as president even more and anything we can do to keep these two kicking, biting, and screaming at each other has got to be good for our country.

I never dreamed the day would come when I would be voting for Hlllary Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I are both going to vote her in Texas tomorrow for a candidate we hate, Hillary Clinton. We hate Obama as president even more and anything we can do to keep these two kicking, biting, and screaming at each other has got to be good for our country.</p>
<p>I never dreamed the day would come when I would be voting for Hlllary Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

