<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberals, Conservatives, and Happiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5766.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5766.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: renminbi</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5766.html/comment-page-1#comment-224918</link>
		<dc:creator>renminbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5766#comment-224918</guid>
		<description>If this is the  kind of dreck the NSF funds they need adult supervision or perhaps abolition.The study pre-supposes that inequality is bad. It may or not be,but that isn&#039;t a scientific question,is it? Conservatives are happier because they are productive members of society.

           If one doesn&#039;t think of politics one may absorb liberalism from ones environment,unthinkingly.Think Neo-neocon who got over it. If this is not the case one has to decide to accept  a lot of nonsense.My own guess is that &quot;Liberals&quot; are unhappy because they are often failures-but it is not their fault-it is society&#039;s.And look at all the poor people-they are the prop in this little psychodrama.If there is no poverty they invent it,so they can bathe in their own self-righteousness.Poor Michelle Obama who has to scrimp to pay for piano lessons-$300k/yr is not enough.The pity ,the horror. Please give us a break,because God knows,they won&#039;t.
                    My wife taught in NYC schools and commented that the kids on welfare were more expensively dressed than she was. Let&#039;s say no one was starving.

                I think also Liberals think of themselves as intellectuals-that is they deal with ideas. This is much nobler than actually producing something that people might be willing to pay for;  how wrong it is that people in business make more money than they. This is a form snobbery that is genuinely multicultural;it has appeared everywhere,through out history, but that doesn&#039;t make it right.
           It is all about them and their self importance.As for the poor-well if they really cared they would they would at least try to see what might be genuinely helpful,like school vouchers.Radical chic means never being sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is the  kind of dreck the NSF funds they need adult supervision or perhaps abolition.The study pre-supposes that inequality is bad. It may or not be,but that isn&#8217;t a scientific question,is it? Conservatives are happier because they are productive members of society.</p>
<p>           If one doesn&#8217;t think of politics one may absorb liberalism from ones environment,unthinkingly.Think Neo-neocon who got over it. If this is not the case one has to decide to accept  a lot of nonsense.My own guess is that &#8220;Liberals&#8221; are unhappy because they are often failures-but it is not their fault-it is society&#8217;s.And look at all the poor people-they are the prop in this little psychodrama.If there is no poverty they invent it,so they can bathe in their own self-righteousness.Poor Michelle Obama who has to scrimp to pay for piano lessons-$300k/yr is not enough.The pity ,the horror. Please give us a break,because God knows,they won&#8217;t.<br />
                    My wife taught in NYC schools and commented that the kids on welfare were more expensively dressed than she was. Let&#8217;s say no one was starving.</p>
<p>                I think also Liberals think of themselves as intellectuals-that is they deal with ideas. This is much nobler than actually producing something that people might be willing to pay for;  how wrong it is that people in business make more money than they. This is a form snobbery that is genuinely multicultural;it has appeared everywhere,through out history, but that doesn&#8217;t make it right.<br />
           It is all about them and their self importance.As for the poor-well if they really cared they would they would at least try to see what might be genuinely helpful,like school vouchers.Radical chic means never being sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Love</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5766.html/comment-page-1#comment-224843</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5766#comment-224843</guid>
		<description>Ooooh! I feel a fisking coming on! If somebody finds the actual study let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh! I feel a fisking coming on! If somebody finds the actual study let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

