<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do They All Hope He is Lying?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:44:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sol vason</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-274866</link>
		<dc:creator>sol vason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-274866</guid>
		<description>According to the Mayan calender, a 26,000 year long rotation of the galaxy will be completed in 2012.  The Mayans believe when this happens, there will be Change.  

You suggest a trojan horse, an unseen manipulator. Some power that has guided and shaped Obama&#039;s career.  Perhaps Obama is an avatar of Shiva who will bring about a new world order in 2012. There is no question that forces have gathered that will bring about major Change.

We live in interesting times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Mayan calender, a 26,000 year long rotation of the galaxy will be completed in 2012.  The Mayans believe when this happens, there will be Change.  </p>
<p>You suggest a trojan horse, an unseen manipulator. Some power that has guided and shaped Obama&#8217;s career.  Perhaps Obama is an avatar of Shiva who will bring about a new world order in 2012. There is no question that forces have gathered that will bring about major Change.</p>
<p>We live in interesting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listing to starboard</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-260720</link>
		<dc:creator>listing to starboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-260720</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;He’s a quantum candidate! Like an electron, or Schroedinger’s proverbial cat, he is able to, in a sense, occupy two states simultaneously! Only the act of observation creates an actual position, which I suppose is why many of his supporters don’t want to look too closely…&quot;&lt;/em&gt; -- Capital L

Thank you, Capital L, for triggering some disturbing associations, and causing me to have this, hopefully interesting, revelation.

Though you are on the right track in your very astute observation, closer examination reveals that it is not quite right.  

Since it&#039;s the act of scrutinizing him that forces him to appear to have multiple opinions, he&#039;s the exact opposite of a quantum that has multiple potential trajectories until collapsing it&#039;s probability wave forces it into a specific one.  His behavior is just the other way round from real quantum particles.  

Why, if we were to just &quot;believe&quot; and &quot;have faith&quot; and &quot;hope&quot; in him, (i.e., not bum him out by collapsing his happy-wave), he would only have one opinion (though we wouldn&#039;t ever know what it was)m abd everything would go along without a hitch.  It&#039;s our interference that is causing his seeming confusion.  At least that&#039;s what he keeps telling us when he accuses us of racism when we do that.  (Collapsing happy-waves = &quot;racism,&quot; you see).

So, since he behaves exactly opposite of what one would expect from a quantum, he must really be an anti-quantum, (...unless, of course, we look even harder and find he isn&#039;t?  But that&#039;s just too freaky to even contemplate, so let us forget I even brought it up, OK?)  

Actually, it seems he &quot;isn&#039;t&quot; (in the sense of &quot;well defined&quot;) a lot more than he &quot;is,&quot; (unless we make a &quot;racist&quot; observation), so what we may be dealing with here is more a figment of our imagination than reality.  It only seems real to those who worry about where he wants to take us, because we see that his message of &quot;hope&quot; and &quot;change&quot; doesn&#039;t behave the laws of classical causality, as we would expect it to for the scale of the events under consideration.

In contusion, he seems to be (or not, depending on how &quot;racist&quot; you are) that rarest of phenomena, a Left-handed anti-quantum virtual particle-tician with full Democrat spin  

Will it vanish as swiftly and completely as it appeared, hopefully without disrupting reality overly much? Or will it hijack reality, and annihilate it in a burst of quantum darkness as yet unknown in our universe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;He’s a quantum candidate! Like an electron, or Schroedinger’s proverbial cat, he is able to, in a sense, occupy two states simultaneously! Only the act of observation creates an actual position, which I suppose is why many of his supporters don’t want to look too closely…&#8221;</em> &#8212; Capital L</p>
<p>Thank you, Capital L, for triggering some disturbing associations, and causing me to have this, hopefully interesting, revelation.</p>
<p>Though you are on the right track in your very astute observation, closer examination reveals that it is not quite right.  </p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s the act of scrutinizing him that forces him to appear to have multiple opinions, he&#8217;s the exact opposite of a quantum that has multiple potential trajectories until collapsing it&#8217;s probability wave forces it into a specific one.  His behavior is just the other way round from real quantum particles.  </p>
<p>Why, if we were to just &#8220;believe&#8221; and &#8220;have faith&#8221; and &#8220;hope&#8221; in him, (i.e., not bum him out by collapsing his happy-wave), he would only have one opinion (though we wouldn&#8217;t ever know what it was)m abd everything would go along without a hitch.  It&#8217;s our interference that is causing his seeming confusion.  At least that&#8217;s what he keeps telling us when he accuses us of racism when we do that.  (Collapsing happy-waves = &#8220;racism,&#8221; you see).</p>
<p>So, since he behaves exactly opposite of what one would expect from a quantum, he must really be an anti-quantum, (&#8230;unless, of course, we look even harder and find he isn&#8217;t?  But that&#8217;s just too freaky to even contemplate, so let us forget I even brought it up, OK?)  </p>
<p>Actually, it seems he &#8220;isn&#8217;t&#8221; (in the sense of &#8220;well defined&#8221;) a lot more than he &#8220;is,&#8221; (unless we make a &#8220;racist&#8221; observation), so what we may be dealing with here is more a figment of our imagination than reality.  It only seems real to those who worry about where he wants to take us, because we see that his message of &#8220;hope&#8221; and &#8220;change&#8221; doesn&#8217;t behave the laws of classical causality, as we would expect it to for the scale of the events under consideration.</p>
<p>In contusion, he seems to be (or not, depending on how &#8220;racist&#8221; you are) that rarest of phenomena, a Left-handed anti-quantum virtual particle-tician with full Democrat spin  </p>
<p>Will it vanish as swiftly and completely as it appeared, hopefully without disrupting reality overly much? Or will it hijack reality, and annihilate it in a burst of quantum darkness as yet unknown in our universe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Rostrom</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-241583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Rostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-241583</guid>
		<description>I would ascribe it to visions of a lottery jackpot. If Obama in office follows his radical roots instead of his vaguely moderate recent hedging, it would be a &lt;i&gt;gigantic&lt;/i&gt; victory for the Left. They wouldn&#039;t get &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; they want, but close to it. The upper ranks of the Federal government (including the military) would be purged of patriots, Christians, conservatives, and similar rabble, and packed with feminists, homosexualists, race hustlers, and &quot;trans-national progressives&quot;. Actually, I expect this anyway. But if Obama really tacks left - as they hope, and as his old associations suggest - then expect even more overt radicalism: mass prosecutions of former Bush officials, U.S. soldiers handed over to the ICC or similar bodies...

In their fantasy universe, the Left program is just what the nation and the world need, and only evil conservatives thwart them from bringing about an Age of Gold. Given this potential upside, is it surprising that many of them want him to be their Trojan Horse?

BTW, there is no great clash between &quot;Leftist hopes and dreams&quot; and &quot;stodgy foreign policy advisers&quot;; the Left captured the &quot;international institutions&quot; like the U.N. long ago. They have been calling for U.S. submission to these bodies for decades, just like the Old Line foreign-policy types. Indeed the Left has comforted itself with the idea that their agenda is &quot;mainstream&quot;, and Bushism is radical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would ascribe it to visions of a lottery jackpot. If Obama in office follows his radical roots instead of his vaguely moderate recent hedging, it would be a <i>gigantic</i> victory for the Left. They wouldn&#8217;t get <i>everything</i> they want, but close to it. The upper ranks of the Federal government (including the military) would be purged of patriots, Christians, conservatives, and similar rabble, and packed with feminists, homosexualists, race hustlers, and &#8220;trans-national progressives&#8221;. Actually, I expect this anyway. But if Obama really tacks left &#8211; as they hope, and as his old associations suggest &#8211; then expect even more overt radicalism: mass prosecutions of former Bush officials, U.S. soldiers handed over to the ICC or similar bodies&#8230;</p>
<p>In their fantasy universe, the Left program is just what the nation and the world need, and only evil conservatives thwart them from bringing about an Age of Gold. Given this potential upside, is it surprising that many of them want him to be their Trojan Horse?</p>
<p>BTW, there is no great clash between &#8220;Leftist hopes and dreams&#8221; and &#8220;stodgy foreign policy advisers&#8221;; the Left captured the &#8220;international institutions&#8221; like the U.N. long ago. They have been calling for U.S. submission to these bodies for decades, just like the Old Line foreign-policy types. Indeed the Left has comforted itself with the idea that their agenda is &#8220;mainstream&#8221;, and Bushism is radical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-241122</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-241122</guid>
		<description>Lex, my discussions with folks remain as civil as they want it to be.  When talking politics with people retreating, when cornered with logic, to blah blah blah, racist or blah blah blah, evil neocon, my response is measured and appropriate.

The bottom line: libertarians and conservatives may consider their &quot;progressive&quot; acquaintances misguided or foolish, but not evil, while most (but not all) of the libs here in the Bay State look at anyone not toeing the Democratic Party line as evil or brain damaged.

It&#039;s the people who, to paraphrase the aforementioned Neal Stephenson, try to condense fact from the vapor of their beliefs that beggar the imagination.  Facts seem to be their enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex, my discussions with folks remain as civil as they want it to be.  When talking politics with people retreating, when cornered with logic, to blah blah blah, racist or blah blah blah, evil neocon, my response is measured and appropriate.</p>
<p>The bottom line: libertarians and conservatives may consider their &#8220;progressive&#8221; acquaintances misguided or foolish, but not evil, while most (but not all) of the libs here in the Bay State look at anyone not toeing the Democratic Party line as evil or brain damaged.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the people who, to paraphrase the aforementioned Neal Stephenson, try to condense fact from the vapor of their beliefs that beggar the imagination.  Facts seem to be their enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240924</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240924</guid>
		<description>OK, Brutus is quoting what he said to someone else.  No harm, no foul.  

But, I will leave my comment up as a general statement, even though it is not particularly responsive to Brutus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Brutus is quoting what he said to someone else.  No harm, no foul.  </p>
<p>But, I will leave my comment up as a general statement, even though it is not particularly responsive to Brutus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240918</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240918</guid>
		<description>Lex, I think that you misread Brutus&#039;s comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex, I think that you misread Brutus&#8217;s comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240910</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240910</guid>
		<description>&quot;...I’m especially not happy with IDIOTS LIKE YOU ...&quot;

Brutus, don&#039;t do this.  

The lack of civility is getting me down.  

Make your point courteously.  It is more effective.

It is going to be a vicious and contentious campaign year.  

Let&#039;s all take the high road in our conversations and arguments.  

Nothing less will be tolerated on my posts.  

This goes for everybody.  Me included.  

If you see me fall below that standard, say so in a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;I’m especially not happy with IDIOTS LIKE YOU &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Brutus, don&#8217;t do this.  </p>
<p>The lack of civility is getting me down.  </p>
<p>Make your point courteously.  It is more effective.</p>
<p>It is going to be a vicious and contentious campaign year.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all take the high road in our conversations and arguments.  </p>
<p>Nothing less will be tolerated on my posts.  </p>
<p>This goes for everybody.  Me included.  </p>
<p>If you see me fall below that standard, say so in a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240908</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240908</guid>
		<description>Lex, read Snow Crash first, then Cryptonomicon.  I didn&#039;t think he could blow me away with the latter as much as the former, but he did!

Turfman, DEVAL Patrick (with Obama&#039;s man Axelrod helming his campaign) ran a content-free campaign against a weak Republican candidate and won going away, which is no surprise in the people&#039;s Republic of Massachusetts, where 75% of voters with party affiliation are Democrats.  There was the same disconnect between what people heard and what they projected on his cult.  Now, 16 months later, Patrick&#039;s approvals are in the toilet and he&#039;s been at odds with the 80% Democrat legislature.  People who supported him are now coming to me in the coffee shop and saying that I must be happy that he&#039;s been such a failure.  I tell them, no, I&#039;m not happy, and I&#039;m especially not happy with IDIOTS LIKE YOU who voted for someone that you disagreed with on 70% of the issues but voted for him because he seemed like a good guy (the Biden clean/articulate black guy quote most assuredly obtains here).

By the way, the $25K Deval spent on his office drapes brings them up to the level of &quot;window treatments&quot;!

And Mwalimu Daudi correctly points out, education is NOT intelligence.  I was out with friends this past Saturday evening, and one stated that he may be ready to jump on the Obama bandwagon because he really didn&#039;t like the McCain 100-years in Iraq policy.  I asked if he got any information other than what he read in the Boston (Pravda) Globe; he said he hadn&#039;t.  I told him he had to go home and Google the two Michaels, Totten and Yon.  Until then, his license to talk about Iraq was revoked, and I would personally beat him senseless if he did (as you can with someone you&#039;ve been friends with since 1st grade).

And that&#039;s the problem.  There are many out there willing to spit on their franchise by not being informed, which in the Internet Age is criminal.  I have personally cost Obama three votes in the general election just by educating lazy family members.  Not every Obama suppoter has drunk the Kool Aid, and they need to be informed as to what this guy really stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lex, read Snow Crash first, then Cryptonomicon.  I didn&#8217;t think he could blow me away with the latter as much as the former, but he did!</p>
<p>Turfman, DEVAL Patrick (with Obama&#8217;s man Axelrod helming his campaign) ran a content-free campaign against a weak Republican candidate and won going away, which is no surprise in the people&#8217;s Republic of Massachusetts, where 75% of voters with party affiliation are Democrats.  There was the same disconnect between what people heard and what they projected on his cult.  Now, 16 months later, Patrick&#8217;s approvals are in the toilet and he&#8217;s been at odds with the 80% Democrat legislature.  People who supported him are now coming to me in the coffee shop and saying that I must be happy that he&#8217;s been such a failure.  I tell them, no, I&#8217;m not happy, and I&#8217;m especially not happy with IDIOTS LIKE YOU who voted for someone that you disagreed with on 70% of the issues but voted for him because he seemed like a good guy (the Biden clean/articulate black guy quote most assuredly obtains here).</p>
<p>By the way, the $25K Deval spent on his office drapes brings them up to the level of &#8220;window treatments&#8221;!</p>
<p>And Mwalimu Daudi correctly points out, education is NOT intelligence.  I was out with friends this past Saturday evening, and one stated that he may be ready to jump on the Obama bandwagon because he really didn&#8217;t like the McCain 100-years in Iraq policy.  I asked if he got any information other than what he read in the Boston (Pravda) Globe; he said he hadn&#8217;t.  I told him he had to go home and Google the two Michaels, Totten and Yon.  Until then, his license to talk about Iraq was revoked, and I would personally beat him senseless if he did (as you can with someone you&#8217;ve been friends with since 1st grade).</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the problem.  There are many out there willing to spit on their franchise by not being informed, which in the Internet Age is criminal.  I have personally cost Obama three votes in the general election just by educating lazy family members.  Not every Obama suppoter has drunk the Kool Aid, and they need to be informed as to what this guy really stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240905</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240905</guid>
		<description>Sam, I too am dismayed that so many people want this guy in the White House. Even if he were to lose in November, the mere fact that he survived the primaries makes me ill. And with his support coming largely from the younger generation, he or someone just as bad would be back with even stronger support next time. So it looks inevitable.

When Carter won in 76, I remember my father saying it wasn&#039;t so bad -- because that guy was sure to turn people off in a hurry and lead to something better next time around. Prophetic words. But while we recovered from Carter, we may not be so lucky with Obama. It just may not be possible to put things back together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam, I too am dismayed that so many people want this guy in the White House. Even if he were to lose in November, the mere fact that he survived the primaries makes me ill. And with his support coming largely from the younger generation, he or someone just as bad would be back with even stronger support next time. So it looks inevitable.</p>
<p>When Carter won in 76, I remember my father saying it wasn&#8217;t so bad &#8212; because that guy was sure to turn people off in a hurry and lead to something better next time around. Prophetic words. But while we recovered from Carter, we may not be so lucky with Obama. It just may not be possible to put things back together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240864</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240864</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m still voting for him, though, like a lot of Republicans I know.  &lt;/i&gt;

I fail to comprehend this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m still voting for him, though, like a lot of Republicans I know.  </i></p>
<p>I fail to comprehend this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that_guy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240851</link>
		<dc:creator>that_guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240851</guid>
		<description>Wow, Leishman, three metaphors in one post. That&#039;s a rhetorical cocktail if there ever was one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Leishman, three metaphors in one post. That&#8217;s a rhetorical cocktail if there ever was one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leishman</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240847</link>
		<dc:creator>leishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240847</guid>
		<description>OK--the gold-digging woman is &quot;in love&quot; with the rich guy. Yes, he&#039;s fat, ugly, mean-spirited, philandering, doesn&#039;t bathe often, smokes cheap cigars, isn&#039;t really all that smart, and drinks too much--you get the picture. But she&#039;s &quot;in loooooove&quot; with him (read--his money), and it&#039;s easy to predict where things go after the wedding ceremony. BHO, with his slender resume of actual accomplishments, has his (half-)blackness, his youth, his Jim-Jones-like magnetism, and half the electorate is &quot;in looooove&quot; with him (read--the promise of expiation from consumerist/racist guilt). Sadly, only a few of his current adherents will come to see the Emperor&#039;s new clothes for what they are. Meanwhile, the gold-digger&#039;s friends who try to wise her up are &quot;just jealous&quot;. Fortunately, there are still 4+ months for Dorothy and Toto to peer behind the curtain to see who the Wizard really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8211;the gold-digging woman is &#8220;in love&#8221; with the rich guy. Yes, he&#8217;s fat, ugly, mean-spirited, philandering, doesn&#8217;t bathe often, smokes cheap cigars, isn&#8217;t really all that smart, and drinks too much&#8211;you get the picture. But she&#8217;s &#8220;in loooooove&#8221; with him (read&#8211;his money), and it&#8217;s easy to predict where things go after the wedding ceremony. BHO, with his slender resume of actual accomplishments, has his (half-)blackness, his youth, his Jim-Jones-like magnetism, and half the electorate is &#8220;in looooove&#8221; with him (read&#8211;the promise of expiation from consumerist/racist guilt). Sadly, only a few of his current adherents will come to see the Emperor&#8217;s new clothes for what they are. Meanwhile, the gold-digger&#8217;s friends who try to wise her up are &#8220;just jealous&#8221;. Fortunately, there are still 4+ months for Dorothy and Toto to peer behind the curtain to see who the Wizard really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240844</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240844</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If Americans are dumb enough to elect Obama then we deserve the disaster that follows.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, but &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; don&#039;t deserve that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If Americans are dumb enough to elect Obama then we deserve the disaster that follows.</i></p>
<p>Sorry, but <b>I</b> don&#8217;t deserve that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240835</guid>
		<description>If Americans are dumb enough to elect Obama then we deserve the disaster that follows. I no long have faith in the people of this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Americans are dumb enough to elect Obama then we deserve the disaster that follows. I no long have faith in the people of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Manifold</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Manifold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240823</guid>
		<description>&quot;He’s a quantum candidate!  Like an electron, or Schroedinger’s proverbial cat, he is able to, in a sense, occupy two states simultaneously!  Only the act of observation creates an actual position, which I suppose is why many of his supporters don’t want to look too closely …&quot;

Capital L, the box opens on November 4th.  Or perhaps January 20th.

While my reading of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Albions-Seed-British-Folkways-America/dp/0195069056&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Albion&#039;s Seed&lt;/a&gt; suggests that Obama will go the way of Humphrey, Muskie, McGovern, Mondale, Tsongas, Dukakis, Kerry, &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;, if he does not, look for some &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; decisive action between 11/4/08 and 1/20/09, including Israeli termination-with-extreme-prejudice of the Iranian nuclear program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He’s a quantum candidate!  Like an electron, or Schroedinger’s proverbial cat, he is able to, in a sense, occupy two states simultaneously!  Only the act of observation creates an actual position, which I suppose is why many of his supporters don’t want to look too closely …&#8221;</p>
<p>Capital L, the box opens on November 4th.  Or perhaps January 20th.</p>
<p>While my reading of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Albions-Seed-British-Folkways-America/dp/0195069056" rel="nofollow">Albion&#8217;s Seed</a> suggests that Obama will go the way of Humphrey, Muskie, McGovern, Mondale, Tsongas, Dukakis, Kerry, <i>et al</i>, if he does not, look for some <b>very</b> decisive action between 11/4/08 and 1/20/09, including Israeli termination-with-extreme-prejudice of the Iranian nuclear program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jms</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240802</link>
		<dc:creator>jms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240802</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s already been a folk song written about the Obama campaign -- Ken Nordine&#039;s &quot;Flibberty Jib.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already been a folk song written about the Obama campaign &#8212; Ken Nordine&#8217;s &#8220;Flibberty Jib.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poulette</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240800</link>
		<dc:creator>Poulette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240800</guid>
		<description>Shannonlove, I agree completely on the projection. Not so sure he&#039;d be unpopular quickly, though--very un-PC that would be.

[One tiny, itty-bitty nitpick: tabla rassa would be some sort of Indian drum originating from a small town in Italy. &lt;i&gt;tabula rasa&lt;/i&gt;, otoh, is &quot;blank slate.&quot;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannonlove, I agree completely on the projection. Not so sure he&#8217;d be unpopular quickly, though&#8211;very un-PC that would be.</p>
<p>[One tiny, itty-bitty nitpick: tabla rassa would be some sort of Indian drum originating from a small town in Italy. <i>tabula rasa</i>, otoh, is "blank slate."]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240799</guid>
		<description>Linked you &lt;a href=&quot;http://mistersnitch.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-tailoring-new-image-for-broader.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, as part of  an ongoing commentary on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linked you <a href="http://mistersnitch.blogspot.com/2008/06/obama-tailoring-new-image-for-broader.html" rel="nofollow"><b>here</b></a>, as part of  an ongoing commentary on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mugsy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240796</link>
		<dc:creator>Mugsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240796</guid>
		<description>This is similar to the wilful ignorance of Obama&#039;s proclivity to commit mulitiple gaffes - the guy is more gaffe prone than Quayle ever was. Yet, people ignore the gaffes, because it does not &quot;fit&quot; with their mental image of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is similar to the wilful ignorance of Obama&#8217;s proclivity to commit mulitiple gaffes &#8211; the guy is more gaffe prone than Quayle ever was. Yet, people ignore the gaffes, because it does not &#8220;fit&#8221; with their mental image of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incognito</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5890.html/comment-page-1#comment-240769</link>
		<dc:creator>Incognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5890#comment-240769</guid>
		<description>Brilliant analysis as always Lex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant analysis as always Lex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
