I am going to try to make this simple, Men CAN be raped BY WOMEN, any FORCED sexual intercourse, whether it happens to be ORAL, ANAL, or TRADITIONAL. Quit it with this garbage you retarted feminists and women.

That is one of the problems of Radical Feminism: you start asking for equality, but end up asking for special privileges. The radicals codify this by saying, “Women don’t lie about sex.” Which is another way of saying that men are always in the wrong. How is this different from any other prejudice?

Isn’t that exactly what was said, back in the day, when women first tried to raise awareness of rape?

James

The threat of harm from a weapon will coerce. That is how the majority of male rapists gain power over their victims. The thought that a woman is required to go hand-to-hand is risible.

“Also, please explain to me the connection your talking about rape of males in the post, and then quoted Dr.Helen’s paragraph about blackmail and legal power that women had and that men supposedly don’t have a recourse against – and you said she has a point there. So which is it, blackmail and false accusations of male raping women or an actual violent rape that women perpetuate on men you had in mind? You’re the one talking around, not me.”

Another straw man. Let us take a look at what you said previously….

“And your definition of rape expands to women using their powerful position in the workplace to talk men into having sex with them?”

Odd, that. I don’t see anything in either my own words or Dr. Helen’s quote that mentions the workplace, or anything about women who “talk men into having sex with them”. Where in the world did you get that idea? Unless you think that Crystal Gail Magnum was blackmailing the Duke lacrosse team so she could get them into bed.

But it is obvious that confusion reigns at the Tatyana homestead, so let me cut down Dr. Helen’s words even further so you can finally make sense of things.

“Women know that men and boys have no or little legal recourse against them and use this to their advantage to get what they want.”

(snip)

“Our society shames men who are abused by women just as it shamed and blamed women many years ago who were abused by men. Neither strategy is a good one for a society that purports to promote justice and fairness.”

If you have any further questions, then please don’t hesitate to ask. But you might want to stop making stuff up. That is what caused me to get annoyed in the first place.

James

James:
no strawmen. That’s the image I got after reading the paragraph about about “false impression about rape”. And then your comments in this thread.

Please, be specific and explain to me how “would it be reasonable to assume that a female would occasionally victimize a male in such a manner”. What “such manne”? I can’t imagine a woman, even let’s say, twice heavier than man, would physically restrain him in order to have sex with him, by way of showing her dominance.
Also, please explain to me the connection your talking about rape of males in the post, and then quoted Dr.Helen’s paragraph about blackmail and legal power that women had and that men supposedly don’t have a recourse against – and you said she has a point there. So which is it, blackmail and false accusations of male raping women or an actual violent rape that women perpetuate on men you had in mind?
You’re the one talking around, not me.

it’s not “irony of ironies”, it’s still the prevailing male attitude – as confirmed by your comment”

Jeez, lady, I don’t think I wanna know what circles you run in where this is the case. My advice, get better friends.

This is an attempt to create a straw man. In my post above, I very clearly state…

“Women can certainly be criminals, even depraved and violent criminals. Wouldn’t it be reasonable to assume that a female would occasionally victimize a male in such a manner?”

Tell me how anyone can equate the word “occasionally” with “majority”.

“And your definition of rape expands to women using their powerful position in the workplace to talk men into having sex with them?”

Point to a single instance where I said anything of the sort. My focus is on violent crime, not sexual harassment.

Two attempts to construct a straw man in as many sentences. You should run for office.

James

Windy (Wendy?)Wilson: it’s not “irony of ironies”, it’s still the prevailing male attitude – as confirmed by your comment

Jeff: so, you put an equal sign between “grab what you can, you’re entitled” and “Girls are taught to be princesses who are adored”? In your mind the spoiled brat who is used to being adored is equivalent of a rapist?

Ironies of ironies, now they do!

I presume then that you must be the only man in human history whose never had an erection when they didn’t want one? Granted, a man might not get an erection on command with someone he finds physically objectionable but what about the much more common problem of getting an erection with someone who is physically acceptable but otherwise unacceptable?

We all encounter sexual arousal by the presence of people our morality forbids us from actually boinking. What if one of those people decides to force you into a sexual relationship. Could you actually be so sure you wouldn’t stand at attention?

Given the nature of the indoctrination, it’s actually amazing that there are as many decent and thoughtful women as there are.

Nope, one doesn’t need to be aroused to obtain an erection. The aforementioned morning wood being the best example (and, if you ask me, being f*cking annoying). And really, the dude was drunk and passed out, how the hell can one get aroused being drunk and passed out?

Erections are physiological responses. It’s blood rushing into the penis. Orgasms are physiological responses too. Did you know the female orgasm is nothing more then a way for the female body to ease the pain of childbirth? Google it, birthgasms. That’s not implying that childbirth is at all enjoyable.

You serve nothing and no one by perpetuating silly myths (also by pretending to be a male…you might be the first person on the internet not impersonating a voluptuous 17 year old). Jesus, might as well go back to when everyone figured women were raped cause they were asking for it by dressing like total wh*res.

What caused arousal in those cases?

Oh, man, so could I!

But keep in mind that we are discussing a violent, terrible crime which destroys lives. Also keep in mind that I’ve devoted my adult life, and I made some significant personal sacrifices, to try and prevent such crimes from occurring.

If someone is going to deny the possibility of such a crime happening to them, then part of my job is to try and make an impression in an effort to shock them awake.

James