<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Government Wants Your Opinion on Prediction-Markets Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5939.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5939.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5939.html/comment-page-1#comment-244756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5939#comment-244756</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan, Please take a look at my proposal and that of Hedgestreet.  I think mine is more comprehensive than Hedgestreet&#039;s, but we are in agreement on some of the most important points.  For one thing, there is little controversy now that the CFTC has jurisdiction over exchange-traded election event markets.

http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c011.pdf
http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c012.pdf

We might also be more persuasive to the CFTC. While I am a libertarian in general and don&#039;t like regulation, we are at a specific point where a little bit of additional regulation will cause an explosion in legal prediction markets, and possibly soon.  I don&#039;t necessarily disagree with Tom Bell&#039;s draft proposal, and of course it&#039;s true by definition that over-regulation is bad, but that&#039;s not the most effective message for this comment process and the unique opportunity it presents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan, Please take a look at my proposal and that of Hedgestreet.  I think mine is more comprehensive than Hedgestreet&#8217;s, but we are in agreement on some of the most important points.  For one thing, there is little controversy now that the CFTC has jurisdiction over exchange-traded election event markets.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c011.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c011.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c012.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cftc.gov/stellent/groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/frcomment/08-004c012.pdf</a></p>
<p>We might also be more persuasive to the CFTC. While I am a libertarian in general and don&#8217;t like regulation, we are at a specific point where a little bit of additional regulation will cause an explosion in legal prediction markets, and possibly soon.  I don&#8217;t necessarily disagree with Tom Bell&#8217;s draft proposal, and of course it&#8217;s true by definition that over-regulation is bad, but that&#8217;s not the most effective message for this comment process and the unique opportunity it presents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W. Bell</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/5939.html/comment-page-1#comment-244444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=5939#comment-244444</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jonathan, for your kind words and supporting signature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jonathan, for your kind words and supporting signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

