<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some more fisheye pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Goergens</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html/comment-page-1#comment-258858</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Goergens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6042#comment-258858</guid>
		<description>Thanks.

I might use a software like that when I get a more powerful camera that is worth the effort. My old one has just 4 megapixels. That&#039;s good enough for me righ now, and I have to scale images down and reduce resolution before I can put them online anyhow. Once bandwidth and server space are cheap and plentiful enough that I can put images up without serious down editing I&#039;ll finally replace it and think about more fance effects. In the meantime I am experimenting with HDR, and again using pretty small images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>I might use a software like that when I get a more powerful camera that is worth the effort. My old one has just 4 megapixels. That&#8217;s good enough for me righ now, and I have to scale images down and reduce resolution before I can put them online anyhow. Once bandwidth and server space are cheap and plentiful enough that I can put images up without serious down editing I&#8217;ll finally replace it and think about more fance effects. In the meantime I am experimenting with HDR, and again using pretty small images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html/comment-page-1#comment-258757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6042#comment-258757</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation. You are getting cool results.

BTW, have you seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html&quot; target=&quot;new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this pano sofware&lt;/a&gt;? Not the same as fisheye but produces an interesting result. The free demo works great in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation. You are getting cool results.</p>
<p>BTW, have you seen <a href="http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html" target="new" rel="nofollow">this pano sofware</a>? Not the same as fisheye but produces an interesting result. The free demo works great in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Goergens</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html/comment-page-1#comment-258725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Goergens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6042#comment-258725</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not quite that bad with the original, larger versions of the images, but I know what you mean.

The advantage of the fisheye lens is that you can capture a much wider view than with a regular lens. In the case of the pictures in this thread, it is a camera with 170 degree angle from left to right. Because it is a cheap camera that uses film (now that takes me way back), I can&#039;t zoom with it; that&#039;s why the pictures are cut off on top and bottom. The best I can do is to look for the sweet spot in any given location, where I can make the most of the wide angle and keep fisheye distortion at a minimum. Mostly, I use the fisheye camera for capturing a whole vista, distortions and all, so I have a picture that shows how the buildings are located in respect to each other. After that, I take detailed pictures of the buildings with my digital camera.

What I do like about the pictures here is the color and the lighting. I couldn&#039;t capture that in quite the same way with my old Canon. I case of the top most image, I also wouldn&#039;t have pointed a digital camera at the evening sun, for fear of damaging the sensor. 

For the pictures in the other thread, I used a door viewer with a 200 degree angle lens that I held in front of my digital camera. It&#039;s kind of a kludge, but it works well enough, as long as it is sunny weather.

You have probably noticed that Glenn Reynolds also &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/020139.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uses a fish eye lens&lt;/a&gt;, but he must have edited them some before posting them. He uses this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000144I30?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=wwwviolentkicom&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=B000144I30&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pretty expensive one&lt;/a&gt;, and that also is a lot more versatile than the stuff I use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not quite that bad with the original, larger versions of the images, but I know what you mean.</p>
<p>The advantage of the fisheye lens is that you can capture a much wider view than with a regular lens. In the case of the pictures in this thread, it is a camera with 170 degree angle from left to right. Because it is a cheap camera that uses film (now that takes me way back), I can&#8217;t zoom with it; that&#8217;s why the pictures are cut off on top and bottom. The best I can do is to look for the sweet spot in any given location, where I can make the most of the wide angle and keep fisheye distortion at a minimum. Mostly, I use the fisheye camera for capturing a whole vista, distortions and all, so I have a picture that shows how the buildings are located in respect to each other. After that, I take detailed pictures of the buildings with my digital camera.</p>
<p>What I do like about the pictures here is the color and the lighting. I couldn&#8217;t capture that in quite the same way with my old Canon. I case of the top most image, I also wouldn&#8217;t have pointed a digital camera at the evening sun, for fear of damaging the sensor. </p>
<p>For the pictures in the other thread, I used a door viewer with a 200 degree angle lens that I held in front of my digital camera. It&#8217;s kind of a kludge, but it works well enough, as long as it is sunny weather.</p>
<p>You have probably noticed that Glenn Reynolds also <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/020139.php" rel="nofollow">uses a fish eye lens</a>, but he must have edited them some before posting them. He uses this <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000144I30?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=wwwviolentkicom&amp;link_code=as3&amp;camp=211189&amp;creative=373489&amp;creativeASIN=B000144I30" rel="nofollow">pretty expensive one</a>, and that also is a lot more versatile than the stuff I use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6042.html/comment-page-1#comment-258635</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6042#comment-258635</guid>
		<description>I like these images but they have a claustrophobic feel. It&#039;s as if you were inside a diving helmet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like these images but they have a claustrophobic feel. It&#8217;s as if you were inside a diving helmet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

