<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Longing for a Messiah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotus</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-275113</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-275113</guid>
		<description>Ginny said:

How have we come to a place where someone who asks God to help him/her understand the Lord’s bidding is seen as a self-righteous ”Christianist” by those who see in a fallible politician a Messiah?

Ginny, one must remember all gods are jealous gods.  Despite what they might say, the &quot;Obamians&quot; do not reject religion per se.  They simply reject (and condemn) all religions but their own.  Something David Berlinski said in his recent book, THE DEVIL&#039;S DELUSION, about Richard Dawkins comes to mind:  &quot;The physical concept in which Dawkins has placed his confidence in is something that is either infinite or inscrutible, or otherwise unknown.  Men have come to faith on the basis of far less . . . . His atheism not withstanding, Dawkins believes that he is a &#039;deeply religious man.&#039;  He simply prefers an alien cult.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ginny said:</p>
<p>How have we come to a place where someone who asks God to help him/her understand the Lord’s bidding is seen as a self-righteous ”Christianist” by those who see in a fallible politician a Messiah?</p>
<p>Ginny, one must remember all gods are jealous gods.  Despite what they might say, the &#8220;Obamians&#8221; do not reject religion per se.  They simply reject (and condemn) all religions but their own.  Something David Berlinski said in his recent book, THE DEVIL&#8217;S DELUSION, about Richard Dawkins comes to mind:  &#8220;The physical concept in which Dawkins has placed his confidence in is something that is either infinite or inscrutible, or otherwise unknown.  Men have come to faith on the basis of far less . . . . His atheism not withstanding, Dawkins believes that he is a &#8216;deeply religious man.&#8217;  He simply prefers an alien cult.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgil xenophon</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274943</link>
		<dc:creator>virgil xenophon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274943</guid>
		<description>OBloodyhell,

I was around during the Carter years also as I watched a $35,000 floating rate Bank note begin at 91/4% and drift up to 23%--practically killed me. BTW, the nature of your posts leads me to believe you are my long-lost blood brother; if not, can I at least be your drinkin&#039; buddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBloodyhell,</p>
<p>I was around during the Carter years also as I watched a $35,000 floating rate Bank note begin at 91/4% and drift up to 23%&#8211;practically killed me. BTW, the nature of your posts leads me to believe you are my long-lost blood brother; if not, can I at least be your drinkin&#8217; buddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obloodyhell</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274934</link>
		<dc:creator>Obloodyhell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274934</guid>
		<description>&gt; If Obama is a second Carter, he will deregulate several major industries, sign a capital-gains tax cut into law, and appoint a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation. Something tells me that these are not what his supporters have in mind.

You forgot the Camp David Accords, while you were brown-nosing Carter.

Carter&#039;s deregulations were entirely in the transportation industries (rail, airline, and trucking), and were merely continuations of policies initiated under Nixon and Ford. To counterbalance that, he ADDED the Federal Department of Energy. 

The tax cuts were in one specific area, otherwise taxes were increased under him. 

And, as for his &quot;appointing a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation&quot;, Miller may have been appointed to do that, but he did a rather sucky job considering inflation peaked in 1979 at 13.3%. It would have been hard for his subsequent pick, Volcker, to have taken it in another direction.

OTOH, excluding the Camp David Accords (which actually wound up doing very little good in the long run), Carter&#039;s foreign policy was a complete shambles, leading to a pissant Iranian government thumbing their nose at one of the two greatest superpowers for well over a year. 

Military? Well, he screwed the pooch on that one with idiotic indecisiveness, demanding a multibranch hostage rescue operation which wound up being aborted halfway into it, and making, once more, America into a laughing stock. And all during this time, Russia is blustering its way to conquering the world despite having no hand at all to play the game with, and no money to put into the pot. &lt;i&gt;But Carter and the left were certain that the USSR was going to win in the end.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, Jay, *I* was around then. 

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;I *know* what a complete, utter, and absolute f***up Carter was&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.

============================================================================
&lt;b&gt;And we&#039;ll be lucky if Obama is not substantially worse than Carter on EVERY front.&lt;/b&gt;
============================================================================

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; If Obama is a second Carter, he will deregulate several major industries, sign a capital-gains tax cut into law, and appoint a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation. Something tells me that these are not what his supporters have in mind.</p>
<p>You forgot the Camp David Accords, while you were brown-nosing Carter.</p>
<p>Carter&#8217;s deregulations were entirely in the transportation industries (rail, airline, and trucking), and were merely continuations of policies initiated under Nixon and Ford. To counterbalance that, he ADDED the Federal Department of Energy. </p>
<p>The tax cuts were in one specific area, otherwise taxes were increased under him. </p>
<p>And, as for his &#8220;appointing a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation&#8221;, Miller may have been appointed to do that, but he did a rather sucky job considering inflation peaked in 1979 at 13.3%. It would have been hard for his subsequent pick, Volcker, to have taken it in another direction.</p>
<p>OTOH, excluding the Camp David Accords (which actually wound up doing very little good in the long run), Carter&#8217;s foreign policy was a complete shambles, leading to a pissant Iranian government thumbing their nose at one of the two greatest superpowers for well over a year. </p>
<p>Military? Well, he screwed the pooch on that one with idiotic indecisiveness, demanding a multibranch hostage rescue operation which wound up being aborted halfway into it, and making, once more, America into a laughing stock. And all during this time, Russia is blustering its way to conquering the world despite having no hand at all to play the game with, and no money to put into the pot. <i>But Carter and the left were certain that the USSR was going to win in the end.</i></p>
<p>Sorry, Jay, *I* was around then. </p>
<p><i><b>I *know* what a complete, utter, and absolute f***up Carter was</b></i>.</p>
<p>============================================================================<br />
<b>And we&#8217;ll be lucky if Obama is not substantially worse than Carter on EVERY front.</b><br />
============================================================================</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Manifold</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Manifold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274680</guid>
		<description>If Obama is a second Carter, he will deregulate several major industries, sign a capital-gains tax cut into law, and appoint a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation.  Something tells me that these are not what his supporters have in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Obama is a second Carter, he will deregulate several major industries, sign a capital-gains tax cut into law, and appoint a Federal Reserve chairman who stops inflation.  Something tells me that these are not what his supporters have in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274662</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274662</guid>
		<description>I suspect that Obama winning will be worse for the Enthusiasts. Once he is in the White House he will have to be a politician, which means acting rather than talking. His background indicates that he is not much good at that and his decisions are very odd. So, how will they cope with an object of worship that is just a bumbling-stumbling politician?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that Obama winning will be worse for the Enthusiasts. Once he is in the White House he will have to be a politician, which means acting rather than talking. His background indicates that he is not much good at that and his decisions are very odd. So, how will they cope with an object of worship that is just a bumbling-stumbling politician?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obloodyhell</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274584</link>
		<dc:creator>Obloodyhell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274584</guid>
		<description>&gt; &lt;i&gt;This led to her making a comment about Carter (whom she voted for): “You don’t understand, after the sixties and Nixon, Carter seemed like such a nice guy, so fresh, so different.” I can’t help but keep thinking about what she said. I think that we will soon find out.&lt;/i&gt;

I sure hope not. Trust me. 

&lt;b&gt;The seventies SUCKED.&lt;/b&gt; 

&lt;i&gt;Big time.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; <i>This led to her making a comment about Carter (whom she voted for): “You don’t understand, after the sixties and Nixon, Carter seemed like such a nice guy, so fresh, so different.” I can’t help but keep thinking about what she said. I think that we will soon find out.</i></p>
<p>I sure hope not. Trust me. </p>
<p><b>The seventies SUCKED.</b> </p>
<p><i>Big time.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElamBend</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6332.html/comment-page-1#comment-274570</link>
		<dc:creator>ElamBend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6332#comment-274570</guid>
		<description>About 10 months ago, I met with an attorney friend of mine, someone my senior.  I told her my problems with Obama, counter to her enthusiasm.  I then said that I thought he may be a second Carter.  This led to her making a comment about Carter (whom she voted for): &quot;You don&#039;t understand, after the sixties and Nixon, Carter seemed like such a nice guy, so fresh, so different.&quot;  I can&#039;t help but keep thinking about what she said.  

I think that we will soon find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 10 months ago, I met with an attorney friend of mine, someone my senior.  I told her my problems with Obama, counter to her enthusiasm.  I then said that I thought he may be a second Carter.  This led to her making a comment about Carter (whom she voted for): &#8220;You don&#8217;t understand, after the sixties and Nixon, Carter seemed like such a nice guy, so fresh, so different.&#8221;  I can&#8217;t help but keep thinking about what she said.  </p>
<p>I think that we will soon find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

