<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Junk Science Warning Signs: Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html/comment-page-1#comment-323582</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6861#comment-323582</guid>
		<description>To John Jay
It is really more than depressing to see in which publicity and media society we are living.  You wrote a great deal and I am sure with good intention.  Unfortunately whether you realize it or not, you have relied entirely upon hearsay.  I am afraid you are being used without your knowledge to publicize what a determined little clique want the world to believe.  If you are interested in facts then here are the facts.  Mohamed El Naschies work was plagiarized by a group who wrote a paper published about a year or so ago in Scientific American.  The group leader is Dr. Renate Loll.  She works with the Nobel laureate Gerard ‘tHooft in Utrecht.  She is originally German and worked in Max Blanc Inst. near Berlin.  She knows Prof. El Naschie very well.  Many years ago El Naschie gave a lecture in her Max Blanc Inst. in Germany.  That is the first connection.  The second connection is that El Naschie is a very close personal and scientific friend of Gerard ‘tHooft.  Without his knowledge many scientists, students and collaborators of El Naschie wrote angry letters and comments to Scientific American complaining about Loll.  This was quite embarrassing for Renate Loll and many of her friends came to her rescue.  It was also embarrassing for Nobel laureate Gerard ‘tHooft because Renate got 1.2 million Euro prize for this work in addition to a 2.4 million Euro grant research money for the Inst. of Gerard ‘tHooft.  In a cloak and dagger action decision was taken to punish and discredit El Naschie.  That is how the whole thing started.  The one man internet army John Baez was called to direct the attacks and a meticulous plan was drawn involving Nature, the Inst. of Physics, UK and finally Die Zeit in Germany.  All this failed to reach the ultimate goal and now they are baffled as to how El Naschie could sustain all these attacks and stay stedfast.  If you check you will find that Die Zeit first modified their article, then withdrew it.  In addition El Naschie won a case in Munich against Die Zeit and another case in Hamburg is about to be won.  It is established beyond any doubt that Christoph Drosser, the journalist of Die Zeit was lying.  He was lying to help his friend also a German named Quirin Schiermeier who works for Nature.  Nature has realized that they have been conned.  They withdrew their article from the internet.  There is a case pending in the High Court in London.  El Naschie is a victim of a colossal defamation campaign led by all the above.  Now to the facts about him.  He is a scientifically and financially totally independent person since he was 30.  He is now 66 and has run the journal for two decades.  He neither needs promotion, nor fame nor in fact money.  He got his Diploma in structural engineering from the University of Hannover.  He got his Ph.D. from University College London in 1974.  He was a student of Lord Henry Chilver who was the science advisor of Margaret Thatcher.  He was invited to join Cambridge.  He never applied nor needed to apply for a job anywhere, including Cambridge.  He has published about 900 papers and his average productivity dropped when he became the Editor in Chief of Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals which he founded.  Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals is still being produced and carries the name of Mohamed El Naschie and his papers are still being published.  Scientific questions of the merit of his work should be discussed in scientific papers, not on blogs devoted to gossip.  None the less, here we are.  We live in a world it seems controlled by gossip.  I am in Google, thus I am.  It is really sad, extremely sad and the most sad point about it is that the truth nowadays is a function of repetition and publicity.  John Baez notorious article about El Naschie disappeared and so did all the other articles.  However from this evil defamatory article, millions of other articles mushroomed and the truth is totally lost.  Then a year or two later these gossips land on your desk and you try to rationalize the irrational but all that you have done was really planned for you to do without your knowledge.  I hope these facts do not depress you as it does depress me and I hope you check everything for yourself.  Do not jump into conclusions.  Just remember what Hitlers propaganda minister said.  When you make a lie, make it so big that most people will say it is impossible for it to be a lie.  Mohamed El Naschie was a great guy for twenty years running the journal which he founded for all that time.  All of a sudden, after the publication of Renate Loll’s paper, everything changed.
Best regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To John Jay<br />
It is really more than depressing to see in which publicity and media society we are living.  You wrote a great deal and I am sure with good intention.  Unfortunately whether you realize it or not, you have relied entirely upon hearsay.  I am afraid you are being used without your knowledge to publicize what a determined little clique want the world to believe.  If you are interested in facts then here are the facts.  Mohamed El Naschies work was plagiarized by a group who wrote a paper published about a year or so ago in Scientific American.  The group leader is Dr. Renate Loll.  She works with the Nobel laureate Gerard ‘tHooft in Utrecht.  She is originally German and worked in Max Blanc Inst. near Berlin.  She knows Prof. El Naschie very well.  Many years ago El Naschie gave a lecture in her Max Blanc Inst. in Germany.  That is the first connection.  The second connection is that El Naschie is a very close personal and scientific friend of Gerard ‘tHooft.  Without his knowledge many scientists, students and collaborators of El Naschie wrote angry letters and comments to Scientific American complaining about Loll.  This was quite embarrassing for Renate Loll and many of her friends came to her rescue.  It was also embarrassing for Nobel laureate Gerard ‘tHooft because Renate got 1.2 million Euro prize for this work in addition to a 2.4 million Euro grant research money for the Inst. of Gerard ‘tHooft.  In a cloak and dagger action decision was taken to punish and discredit El Naschie.  That is how the whole thing started.  The one man internet army John Baez was called to direct the attacks and a meticulous plan was drawn involving Nature, the Inst. of Physics, UK and finally Die Zeit in Germany.  All this failed to reach the ultimate goal and now they are baffled as to how El Naschie could sustain all these attacks and stay stedfast.  If you check you will find that Die Zeit first modified their article, then withdrew it.  In addition El Naschie won a case in Munich against Die Zeit and another case in Hamburg is about to be won.  It is established beyond any doubt that Christoph Drosser, the journalist of Die Zeit was lying.  He was lying to help his friend also a German named Quirin Schiermeier who works for Nature.  Nature has realized that they have been conned.  They withdrew their article from the internet.  There is a case pending in the High Court in London.  El Naschie is a victim of a colossal defamation campaign led by all the above.  Now to the facts about him.  He is a scientifically and financially totally independent person since he was 30.  He is now 66 and has run the journal for two decades.  He neither needs promotion, nor fame nor in fact money.  He got his Diploma in structural engineering from the University of Hannover.  He got his Ph.D. from University College London in 1974.  He was a student of Lord Henry Chilver who was the science advisor of Margaret Thatcher.  He was invited to join Cambridge.  He never applied nor needed to apply for a job anywhere, including Cambridge.  He has published about 900 papers and his average productivity dropped when he became the Editor in Chief of Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals which he founded.  Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals is still being produced and carries the name of Mohamed El Naschie and his papers are still being published.  Scientific questions of the merit of his work should be discussed in scientific papers, not on blogs devoted to gossip.  None the less, here we are.  We live in a world it seems controlled by gossip.  I am in Google, thus I am.  It is really sad, extremely sad and the most sad point about it is that the truth nowadays is a function of repetition and publicity.  John Baez notorious article about El Naschie disappeared and so did all the other articles.  However from this evil defamatory article, millions of other articles mushroomed and the truth is totally lost.  Then a year or two later these gossips land on your desk and you try to rationalize the irrational but all that you have done was really planned for you to do without your knowledge.  I hope these facts do not depress you as it does depress me and I hope you check everything for yourself.  Do not jump into conclusions.  Just remember what Hitlers propaganda minister said.  When you make a lie, make it so big that most people will say it is impossible for it to be a lie.  Mohamed El Naschie was a great guy for twenty years running the journal which he founded for all that time.  All of a sudden, after the publication of Renate Loll’s paper, everything changed.<br />
Best regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html/comment-page-1#comment-308994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6861#comment-308994</guid>
		<description>My blog is devoted entirely to El Naschie.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;El Naschie Watch&lt;/a&gt;

Jason, blog proprietor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog is devoted entirely to El Naschie.</p>
<p><a href="http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">El Naschie Watch</a></p>
<p>Jason, blog proprietor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan from Madison</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html/comment-page-1#comment-298270</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan from Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6861#comment-298270</guid>
		<description>Good idea Shannon.

Excellent couple of posts John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea Shannon.</p>
<p>Excellent couple of posts John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Love</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/6861.html/comment-page-1#comment-298268</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=6861#comment-298268</guid>
		<description>You guys should put together a little press packet explaining all this nonsense so if this guy surfaces again you can bombard journalist with this info. You can imply that they will be stigmatized a gullible dupes (which they are) if they treat him seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys should put together a little press packet explaining all this nonsense so if this guy surfaces again you can bombard journalist with this info. You can imply that they will be stigmatized a gullible dupes (which they are) if they treat him seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

