Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • “Benefit?” of the Real Estate Collapse

    Posted by Carl from Chicago on March 28th, 2009 (All posts by )

    Many stories have been written about the victims and losses in the collapse of real estate values, but few about the “winners”. Here’s one:

    Coyote Ugly! This fine establishment (I am reminded of the line in Animal House when the fraternity representative is defending the Delta house by saying that it has “A long history of existence”) sits on what would appear to be a very valuable tract of land in the River North area of Chicago. Given that the Coyote can’t be a high rent tenant and it takes up a lot of a city block, you’d figure that some real estate developer would knock it down (wouldn’t take much, the damn thing is practically a tent and it is a wonder that it doesn’t just blow over)and put up a big condominium or the like.

    But now that NO ONE can get financing for any type of new construction (and the existing construction is at risk of sitting there, half completed) the Coyote will be protected, likely for many years, since this bust will take a while before the animal spirits of capitalism rise again in the form of easy bank loans to finance condominium construction. In the interim period we will have to rely on the low power of that scavenging, mangy Coyote animal on this prime piece of real estate.

    Cross posted at LITGM


    4 Responses to ““Benefit?” of the Real Estate Collapse”

    1. Dan from Madison Says:

      I was just in Memphis on business and spent some time at the Coyote Ugly on Beale St. Too fun.

    2. david foster Says:

      The big winner, of course, is the aggregate of those who–because of their age or whatever other reason–have not yet bought their first house.

      There’s a good argument to be made that increases in housing prices (except for those based on actual physical improvements) do not represent increases to the national wealth but only reallocations of that wealth, particularly across generations.

    3. David Foster Says:

      …meant to say “increases/decreases in national wealth”

    4. sol vason Says:

      Obama promised he would end the cycle of boom and bust because it is so destructive. This can be done only by eliminating booms (because busts can never be eliminated except by creating a boom). Booms are eliminated by taxing boomers at 90% or more. That is what FDR did. FDR is Obama’s hero. FDR never had a boom.

      Eliminating booms requires government regulation of all economic activity in order to smooth out bubbles before they burst. This requires central planning. Central planning requires a government that regulates every possible human activity.

      Fortunately the US government has Total Power already. All Obama needs do is centralize this power in the white house (using “czars” or dictators) and the totality of central planning results. Many countries have achieved paradise using central planning within a benevolent totalitarianism – China under Mao, Russia under Stalin, Cuba under Castro, Cambodia under Pot Pol all have been lavishly praised (while they were in power) by the Washington Post and New York Times as well as the overwhelming majority of academic scholars.

      Do not look for an restart of a building boom. Coyote Ugly will remain until Sharia Law removes it. Sharia law has all the answers because the Prophet, may Allah’s blessings be upon him, wrote them down.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.