Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Trouble in Lahore

    Posted by James R. Rummel on March 30th, 2009 (All posts by )

    So called “gunmen” have attacked a police academy in Pakistan. Eleven innocent people, eight police and three civilians, have been killed.

    Think this is India getting some revenge for the Mumbai attacks last year? That is too thriller-of-the-week for me to take seriously unless there is some evidence. Besides, there are enough Islamic terrorist groups wandering around inside Pakistan that you don’t need to go looking outside the country for someone pissed off enough to pull a stunt like this.

    Strategypage has posted a pretty good essay concerning how the ISI, which is Pakistan’s intelligence services, has a very close working relationship with several terrorist groups. Seems the ISI political section was disbanded last year. It could be that this is some scheme put together by the spooks to prove to the new civilian government that they really need to give ISI a longer leash. But that is pretty thriller-of-the-week as well.

    Some of the “gunmen” have been captured. I doubt they will keep any secrets for long.

    (Cross posted at Hell in a Handbasket.)


    2 Responses to “Trouble in Lahore”

    1. AMac Says:

      > Think this is India getting some revenge for the Mumbai attacks last year?

      More Occam’s Razor, please.

      Bill Roggio at The Long War Journal reports that Baitullah Mehsud takes credit for Pakistan attacks, threatens US.

      Baitullah Mehsud, the Leader of Pakistan’s unified Taliban movement, threatened to attack the US and took credit for three recent attacks in Pakistan, including yesterday’s deadly military assault on a police training center in Lahore. Baitullah claimed responsibility for the Lahore attack attack as well as suicide attacks against security forces in Islamabad and Bannu during interviews with Pakistani news outlets and international wire services.

      More than thirty (not eight) police and recruits were apparently killed in the attack, but the Pakistani government doesn’t like reporting high casualty figures.

    2. AMac Says:

      Ah, thanks for the clarification (seriously).

      And sorry for the snark, which I see was not merited. I also didn’t realize that the Indian gov’t or press was initially reporting the (wishfully) lower casualty figure.

      Some Pakistani journalists and internet commenters do seem (generalization ahead) prone to seeing the sinister hand of India whenever anything goes wrong in their country, and seem to discount any evidence that suggests that Pakistan might have its own home-grown problems and actors that have virtually nothing to do with the giant neighbor next door. To a westerner, this often seems like incredible blindness. Well, it is incredible blindness.

      Of course, a talented writer can take pretty much any set of facts and weave pretty much any story out of them, no matter how fantastic. With the help of the right set of filters (selective omission, etc.). A NYT op-ed a few months ago on the Mumbai attacks by President Asif Ali Zardawi was a notable example of that (mocked by Mencius Moldbug here.

      Pakistan is among the worst of the U.S.’s and the civilized world’s problem states. It’s good that it’s getting more attention in the West, though clearly bad that its situation is deteriorating at an accelerating pace.

      Apologies also for the unclosed html tag supra.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.