Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Further to the previous posting

    Posted by Helen on May 29th, 2009 (All posts by )

    As Lex, probably wisely, decided not to have any comments on his posting about No. 230873 Second Subaltern Elizabeth Windsor I thought I would put up a link to my own posting on the subject.

    May I just add that there is no need to worry about Her Majesty: she will survive this snub and continue serenely on her way. The last politician who thought he could supplant her in people’s hearts and minds was Tony Blair. Ha! That’s all I can say, to quote Bertie Wooster. Ha!


    9 Responses to “Further to the previous posting”

    1. david foster Says:

      What official reason did the 3 naricssists give for this disinvitation?

      Or did they even bother to give a reason?

    2. Lexington Green Says:

      Thanks, Helen.

      A much more rational and fact-based post than mine.

      I can barely type I despise these people so much.

    3. Helen Says:

      That’s OK, Lex, I loathe and despise them as well. The only reason we are getting is that it was some sort of a muddle. Each thought the other was inviting her and the French are now saying that she is, of course, welcome to come, should she want to. Quite rightly, she has refused. I have this great dream that as the three narcissists appear, the veterans with one accord turn their backs on them. Sadly, they are not the sort of people who would behave so badly.

    4. tomw Says:

      Perhaps she should have a ceremony at the villages and harbors where the ‘armada’ embarked upon their quest. I don’t believe there has been much accorded to the ‘base’ that allowed the expeditionary force to succeed.
      There must have been a lot of sacrifice that is undocumented, sadly.
      So, that is my suggestion. Visit the southern ports and villages. Hail those that may have stayed home, but worked their fingers to the bone to enable the victory that came ten months later.

    5. Eddie Says:

      An absolutely atrocious act. I like the idea of visiting the armada origin points while the Treacherous Three meet. Better yet, may she sail on a vessel with veterans of that time to pay homage to the graves of her people in France. The men (and women) of that time (and hopefully their grandchildren) who would sail with her would rightly treasure the time with their fellow veteran for eternity.

    6. tyouth Says:

      The effrontery of the little, largely ignorant, minds in power these days (the ignorance of the populace that supports them doesn’t bear thinking about) is disheartening.

    7. Bill White Says:

      You wrote: Queen Elizabeth II is the last living head of state who served in uniform in World War II.

      Don’t forget Joseph Ratzinger, who served briefly in the German army in WW2, was held by the Americans as a POW, and is now head of state of Vatican City State.

    8. Carl from Chicago Says:

      My only comment on the other post is that for some reason the headline is garbled – I am running firefox… the word after subaltern cannot be read.

      On your comment of the Ratzinger, I think it was summed up best by “Junior” the cop who wears his bullet-proof vest outside of his uniform, in a recent (fictional, of course) episode of Reno 911! when the Vatican comes to visit and he says “We love your nazi pope!”

    9. Helen Says:

      Don’t know what Reno 911 is and it doesn’t sound like I want to know. Wikipedia says about Pope Benedict XVI:

      In 1943 while still in seminary, he was drafted at age 16 into the German anti-aircraft corps. Ratzinger then trained in the German infantry, but a subsequent illness precluded him from the usual rigours of military duty. As the Allied front drew closer to his post in 1945, he deserted back to his family’s home in Traunstein after his unit had ceased to exist, just as American troops established their headquarters in the Ratzinger household. As a German soldier, he was put in a POW camp, but was released a few months later at the end of the war in the summer of 1945. He reentered the seminary, along with his brother Georg, in November of that year. So yes, he was in uniform but, somehow, it is not quite the same. Interesting that they were drafting 16 year olds as early as 1943. By 1945 they were down to 15 year olds.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.