<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Strategic Clarion Call: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7412.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7412.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:56:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James the lesser</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7412.html/comment-page-1#comment-323346</link>
		<dc:creator>James the lesser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7412#comment-323346</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t &quot;partnerships&quot; usually two-sided?  The Kilcullen Doctrine sounds apt to acquire us an empire in a &quot;fit of absence of mind.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t &#8220;partnerships&#8221; usually two-sided?  The Kilcullen Doctrine sounds apt to acquire us an empire in a &#8220;fit of absence of mind.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7412.html/comment-page-1#comment-323260</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7412#comment-323260</guid>
		<description>Barnett lost me in Great Powers when he spent a half chapter explaining why he thought John Kerry would have been a better president than Bush. I could handle a discussion about Gore vs Bush (I think Gore went insane after 2000 but might have been a decent president), but Kerry is such a flagrant phony, I lost heart and haven&#039;t been able to get through the rest of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barnett lost me in Great Powers when he spent a half chapter explaining why he thought John Kerry would have been a better president than Bush. I could handle a discussion about Gore vs Bush (I think Gore went insane after 2000 but might have been a decent president), but Kerry is such a flagrant phony, I lost heart and haven&#8217;t been able to get through the rest of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7412.html/comment-page-1#comment-323249</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7412#comment-323249</guid>
		<description>&quot;...a possible new basis for grand strategy...&quot;

I am eager to see this.

I need a solid ten hours without major interruption to write a review essay in response to Tom Barnett&#039;s most recent book.  Maybe this summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;a possible new basis for grand strategy&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I am eager to see this.</p>
<p>I need a solid ten hours without major interruption to write a review essay in response to Tom Barnett&#8217;s most recent book.  Maybe this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
