<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Obama/Ayers Connection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html</link>
	<description>Some Chicago Boyz know each other from student days at the University of Chicago. Others are Chicago boys in spirit. The blog name is also intended as a good-humored gesture of admiration for distinguished Chicago boys including those pictured above.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig R. Harmon</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323681</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig R. Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323681</guid>
		<description>Wondering how Ayers&#039;s and Obama&#039;s position on juveniles adjudged as adults are viewed here. A 13 year old is not an adult whether he or she picks up a gun and uses it or not. How much sense does it make to judge them as adults in a court system set up for judging adults?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wondering how Ayers&#8217;s and Obama&#8217;s position on juveniles adjudged as adults are viewed here. A 13 year old is not an adult whether he or she picks up a gun and uses it or not. How much sense does it make to judge them as adults in a court system set up for judging adults?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett_McS</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323653</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett_McS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323653</guid>
		<description>I initially assumed Harry&#039;s comment was a parody; if not it&#039;s even better.

I detect a certain sympathy with the Communist&#039;s idea of democracy: One election, one time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially assumed Harry&#8217;s comment was a parody; if not it&#8217;s even better.</p>
<p>I detect a certain sympathy with the Communist&#8217;s idea of democracy: One election, one time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onparkstreet</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323646</link>
		<dc:creator>onparkstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323646</guid>
		<description>Oh, I have no idea what the above means, if anything, I just thought the title of the article was kind of interesting - why word it that way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I have no idea what the above means, if anything, I just thought the title of the article was kind of interesting &#8211; why word it that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onparkstreet</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323639</link>
		<dc:creator>onparkstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323639</guid>
		<description>http://wednesdayjournalonline.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&amp;SubSectionID=10&amp;ArticleID=14843&amp;TM=58827.52

Convicted Oak Parker traveled in Obama, Daley circles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wednesdayjournalonline.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&#038;SubSectionID=10&#038;ArticleID=14843&#038;TM=58827.52" rel="nofollow">http://wednesdayjournalonline.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&#038;SubSectionID=10&#038;ArticleID=14843&#038;TM=58827.52</a></p>
<p>Convicted Oak Parker traveled in Obama, Daley circles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323633</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Get over it. You lost.&lt;/i&gt;

Obama was elected, so we shouldn&#039;t criticize him? I don&#039;t recall many people applying this standard to George W. Bush, not that they should have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Get over it. You lost.</i></p>
<p>Obama was elected, so we shouldn&#8217;t criticize him? I don&#8217;t recall many people applying this standard to George W. Bush, not that they should have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Love</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323619</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323619</guid>
		<description>Harry Angstom,

&lt;i&gt;Get over it. You lost.&lt;/i&gt;

This is a democracy. All loses and wins are temporary. More importantly, it is our duty as citizens to criticize all actions and practices we believe unwise or corrupt. 

Besides, just because someone wins an election decisive doesn&#039;t mean they are a moral person. Nixon won two landslide elections. Neither does it mean they are competent. Carter won his first election handily and everyone thinks he was a nice guy but as President he was naive and hapless. 

&lt;i&gt;...not how Republicans are supposed to respond to new ideas by a new leader.&lt;/i&gt;

What ideas that Obama advocates can possibly qualify as new? His ideas are nothing but 1970&#039;s retreads. I would say gay-marriage but, hey, he opposes that to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Angstom,</p>
<p><i>Get over it. You lost.</i></p>
<p>This is a democracy. All loses and wins are temporary. More importantly, it is our duty as citizens to criticize all actions and practices we believe unwise or corrupt. </p>
<p>Besides, just because someone wins an election decisive doesn&#8217;t mean they are a moral person. Nixon won two landslide elections. Neither does it mean they are competent. Carter won his first election handily and everyone thinks he was a nice guy but as President he was naive and hapless. </p>
<p><i>&#8230;not how Republicans are supposed to respond to new ideas by a new leader.</i></p>
<p>What ideas that Obama advocates can possibly qualify as new? His ideas are nothing but 1970&#8242;s retreads. I would say gay-marriage but, hey, he opposes that to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mishu</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323616</link>
		<dc:creator>mishu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323616</guid>
		<description>Harry&#039;s a member of Barack Obama&#039;s Revolutionary Guard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry&#8217;s a member of Barack Obama&#8217;s Revolutionary Guard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry angstrom</title>
		<link>http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/7496.html/comment-page-1#comment-323609</link>
		<dc:creator>harry angstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoboyz.net/?p=7496#comment-323609</guid>
		<description>Get over it. You lost.  Obama is our president and Ayers has a tenured position...and the public continues to love Obama...Disregard Nancy&#039;s Just Say No: she was talking about drugs and not how Republicans are supposed to respond to new ideas by a new leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over it. You lost.  Obama is our president and Ayers has a tenured position&#8230;and the public continues to love Obama&#8230;Disregard Nancy&#8217;s Just Say No: she was talking about drugs and not how Republicans are supposed to respond to new ideas by a new leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

