Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Frankly, My Dear Readers, I Don’t Give a Damn

    Posted by James R. Rummel on June 15th, 2009 (All posts by )

    After the Shah was deposed, a constitution was enacted in Iran which set out the details of their government.

    It pretty much takes the form of a parliamentary system, with a President and elected legislature. But I’ve always just assumed that all of it is for appearances sake. A dog and pony show to placate the rubes.

    The reason why is due to the fact that, try as they might to cloak their government in the guise of a functioning democracy, real power is wielded by a single man. No one is able to do jack unless the Supreme Leader approves. Every position of any note, from high ranking military commanders to the people who run the media to the head judge in the country, is appointed by this guy.

    All new laws have to be approved by something called the Guardian Council. People running for parliament have to be approved by the G.C. before being allowed to take their posts. And who makes up this unelected body? It consists of six people hand picked by S.L. and another six hand picked by the head judge. And, in the paragraph above, who did I mention picks the head judge?

    It is possible that some form of dispute can arise between the Guardian Council and parliament, although that seems extremely unlikely. But, should it happen, then the dispute is decided by the Expediency Council. And who appoints every single member of the E.C? If you can’t guess, then you haven’t been paying attention.

    Besides having a title that sounds exactly like a comic book villain that Captain America would have fought, who is the Supreme Leader? A cleric. A religious leader. Iran is in the iron grip of a theocracy. The only people in the entire country who have direct control over the citizenry, from the military officers who control the guns to the media moguls who control the news, serve at the pleasure of a religious fanatic.

    Right now there is a big hullaboo in the Western media about a disputed election in Iran, something that Prof. Reynolds keeps writing blog posts about. (Follow this link and keep scrolling.) People who complain about the recent election results are being attacked and killed out in broad daylight. Foreign journalists are luckier in that they are just being attacked, since none of them have yet died. Politicians, journalists and activists that are considered to be “reformist” (whatever that is supposed to mean) are being arrested and jailed. And all of this is because one candidate for President, which had to be approved by the hand picked lickspittles of the Supreme Leader before he is even allowed to run for office, is defeated by another candidate who also had to be approved by the lickspittles.

    It is being called The Uprising, which seems to be rather grandiose to me. So people are upset that one toothless pawn was selected over another equally worthless tool due to blatant election fraud. What difference can it possibly make?

    I suppose the people in protest are just upset because they can’t ignore the indescribably obvious fact that they are living in a dictatorship, where their votes and wishes mean nothing. Why this should come as a surprise to them puzzles me. Haven’t they been paying attention over the past three decades? A religious leader is in control of the apparatus of governance!

    There is going to be nothing but cosmetic change in Iran until they get rid of the Supreme Leader. That simply isn’t going to happen, due in no small part to the Islamic conviction that religion should have a direct control over everyone’s daily lives, including government.

    No matter how pissed off the voters get, they aren’t going to storm whatever opulent palace this cleric calls home and parade his head through the streets on a pike. Because that is the only way any reform can possibly happen. Unless, of course, some outside agency forcibly deposes the fanatic.

    Where is Captain America when you need him?


    3 Responses to “Frankly, My Dear Readers, I Don’t Give a Damn”

    1. harp1034 Says:

      Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he has been trying to find the elusive Iranian moderate for 30 years. So far he has not found one. Until the ayatollahs are taken out Iran will remain a religious dictatorship bent on world conquest.

    2. Shannon Love Says:

      It is also important to note that only members of certain families tracing their descent back the founder of Shia can be a Mullah and serve on the Guardian Council and as Supreme Leader. The Supreme Leader is technically a priest-king i.e. a hereditary leader who holds both temporal and spiritual powers.

      I think the violence over the election reveals a sharp division within the ruling oligarchy. These types of regimes are so dependent on patronage for economic reward and physical survival that they quickly form internal factions. These factions begin to vie with one another. The “elections” are a means by which factions demonstrate their degree of support within the general Iraqi population. This in turn lets them be the dominant faction within the hierarchy subject to whim of the priest-king.

      The violence over the election shows that the factions have had a falling out. The faction favored by the priest-king did not win so he stepped in changed the results. The result of this will be to shrink the membership of the oligarchy. Those oligarchs cheated out of their “election” will now be dangerous outsiders.

      This process will repeat itself and the oligarchy will continue to shrink until it no longer has enough members to sustain itself.

    3. James Says:

      The reason I think it is important, is that maybe, just maybe, the people are finally sick of the B.S. and are ready to do something about it.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.