Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Calling All Photographers…

    Posted by Carl from Chicago on May 24th, 2014 (All posts by )

    I am looking for an online site to store and edit photos. I switched one of my main machines from PC to MAC but I still run a 50% PC environment at home and now I’ve given up with the share drive model and am considering the cloud.

    Google+ seems like a strong option. Today I use Picasa for photo editing (it’s free and works on MACS and PC’s) but I think Google is phasing it out and users are being encouraged to move to Google+ for photos. There is an app for IOS so they can be uploaded from phones and iPads too.

    There are other tools out there, too. I used to use Shutterfly but I don’t really like how hard it is to get your photos OUT of there. It is more for making books rather than just storing everything from all your sources.

    I also use Google for some other things like Blogger but don’t want to link the two. Blogger is also pretty crummy (we use at at LITGM) and probably at some point we will just move that over to hosted word press (which is awesome), but that’s a different (boring) story. I’d get another ID.

    Since many, many of the photographers here are probably in the same boat I am looking for advice. I know that the pros will always have photoshop on a hard drive so I am thinking more of the advice for amateurs like me ;)

    This WSJ article discusses photo storage and also likes Google+, but there are other contenders as well.

     

    9 Responses to “Calling All Photographers…”

    1. Jay Says:

      I’d suggest flickr for storage. You get 1 TB free and you have control over licensing and whether or not they are publicly viewable. I’ve never used an online editor but I would suggest Photoshop Elements as an inexpensive yet very versatile editor.

    2. John Says:

      I would stick to google since all my stuff are integrated into the google cloud thus making it more convenient. Logging in google alone gives me access to all its apps but that doesn’t mean google+ is the best for storing photos.

    3. PenGun Says:

      Photoshop 2 is free. I use it, here’s the deal;

      Go to

      https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=cs2_downloads

      Either create or use your Adobe account to log in and Agree to the next screen.

      There ya go all of CS2 and the serials.

    4. Michael Hiteshew Says:

      Speaking of cameras, this is really cool. Nero automatic camera trigger: http://youtu.be/3V3o6JHd7qE

    5. Mark Garbowski Says:

      I’m a serious photography hobbyist and also think G+ is a good choice for your stated needs. They have moved the Snapseed editing product online, but I believe you need to use Chrome to take advantage of it. Just click on the Edit option in the Menu while viewing any of your photos in G+.

      You should also look for Google’s Auto Backup product for your computer. If you install it on your machine you can tell it which folder it should search for photos and it will automatically back them up to G Drive and if you tell it to resize all images down to 2048PX on the longest side you get unlimited photo storage for free. Full size images can be stored up to a limit or for a fee.

      Jay’s flickr suggestion is also good. Flickr really improved its user experience in the last 2 years for both content creators and viewers, but I don’t know if it offers much in the way of editing. 500px was widely seen as a Flickr killer when it burst on the scene a few years ago, but Flickr got its act together and 500px stumbled in various ways. 500px still showcases images beautifully but some folks are unhappy with its algorithm for ranking images. It also has a freemium model.

      Finally, for those willing to pay more for extra features, SmugMug and Zenfolio only offer paid versions from prices ranging from medium to quite expensive for a variety of services including storage of non-compressed non-resized images. I use SmugMug myself.

    6. PenGun Says:

      My stuff, all edited in CS2, and Capture One for RAW extraction. On my own site even, it’s about $70 a year:

      http://carnagepro.com/photo/EX1/

    7. Jonathan Says:

      Nice images.

    8. ZilWerks Says:

      For what it is worth, Photoshop CS 5.5 on the PC hard drive. I simply do not trust Adobe enough. Most of my graphic artists friends are mixed on the cloud version. Most are apathetic, or have somebody else pay the Adobe $$$. Oddly enough it is the die hard Illustrator fans such as myself that are not trusting of the cloud.

      I do have plenty that use Gimp.

      And that is my $0.02 on the matter.

      –ZilWerks

    9. carl from chicago Says:

      Thanks for all the comments! I think I am going to go with Google Plus.

      I already use Picasa although that doesn’t help me much because all the editing tools in chrome are new.

      I can easily show photos on my ipad and it works well when you have an internet connection. You also can turn on a feature to add incremental photos as you take them (into a pool, and you can delete them later).

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.