Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 

Recommended Photo Store
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading? Click here to find out.
 
Make your Amazon purchases though this banner to support our blog:
(Click here if you don't see the Amazon banner.)
 
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Contributors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Trucks, road damage and road tolls

    Posted by Ralf Goergens on June 2nd, 2007 (All posts by )

    Recently I have become interested in the problem of increasing road congestion. This post is just meant to be a kind of general introduction to the issue, and also to demonstrate how damaging the increasing freight transport via trucks can become if the ensuing problems aren’t addressed properly soon. In follow-up posts the main focus will be on the situation in Europe, where complete gridlock will become inevitable if we don’t do something about current developments. I’ll also write about alternative means of transportation and new technological developments in this area. As a layman, I’d also be grateful for feedback from people who have first-hand knowledge of the industry and will incorporate it into my future posts; I’ll also be happy to correct any mistakes I have made with this one. Provided that any specialists are interested in this post post at all, I’ll very likely get quite an earful… :)
    ————————————————————————————————————-

    This March, Jonathan quoted from an article by Robert Poole at the Reason Foundation’s website, Trucks and Tolling: the Drama Continues:

    The trucking groups don’t seem to realize that the leasing of a few high-profile toll roads is just a small part of a much larger and more important phenomenon: the infusion of global capital into a capital-starved U.S. highway system. The multi-billion-dollar new toll road projects that keep being announced in Texas are a foretaste of what we can look forward to if we create a comparably friendly investment climate in other states.

    This from further up the text also is noteworthy:

    …a trucking industry coalition held a DC news conference to denounce toll road leasing. They charged that such moves burden taxpayers and could have negative impacts on safety, security and motorists. The American Trucking Associations statement even called for the goal of a toll-free national highway system…

    It’s unfortunate that things have come to this pass, because there is much to be gained by truckers and shippers from increased use of toll finance and public-private partnerships.

    There are other good reasons for public-private partnerships and toll-financing. A little known but crucial fact is that wear and tear of roads tends to increase to the fourth power when axle loads go up:

    The relative damaging effect of an axle is considered to be approximately proportional to the fourth power of the load [1, 30]. However, this has been found to be an under-estimate for flexible pavements on weak subgrades such as peat [3, 23], where damage has been found to be proportional to the sixth power and higher.

    In other words, a 40 ton truck can easily cause as much damage to a typical road as 60,000 1 ton cars. The fourth power rule isn’t carved in stone, of course, but it happens to describe damage to roads most accurately. Factors that influence the concrete amount of damage a road suffers are besides subgrades the tires and the paving materials and their specific (di-)stress modes (Link to a 114 kb PDF-File). Distress modes of road pavement include damages such as surface cracking, surface roughness and rutting.

    Regardless of the details, the disparity of the damage caused by trucks compared to passenger cars demonstrates that a highway system without at least some charges on trucks is the equivalent of a hefty subsidy for trucking businesses – road repairs are paid for by taxpayers in general, while truck owners aren’t paying more than anyone else. Trucks are indispensable for transporting the goods that industry and consumers depend on, so a certain amount of subsidies may be unavoidable, but it should at the very least be transparent to what extent the trucking firms are supported. After all, given a cash-starved highway system, a category that includes pretty much any purely state owned system, a refusal to collect tolls will lead to a gradual decay of the infrastructure, increasing gridlock and more roadworks with further slowdown of traffic in general.

    As the article at Reason Foundation points out, freight transportation is increasing even more rapidly than passenger transportation, with a severe capacity crunch not to far in the future. It may therefore be worthwhile to separate cars from trucks along major roadways and trucking firms should be happy to pay for them, as a transportation consultant Poole is quoting puts it.

    The advantages of special toll roads for trucks fortunately go beyond the infusion of global capital and additional capacity for freight transportation. If constructed and operated by private businesses with a minimum of government intervention, the operators will have strong incentives to use subgrades and road materials that are able to withstand damage from heavy trucks to a greater extent than usual, thereby reducing cost for repairs, traffic jams and increasing the general throughput of heavy vehicles, compared to conventional highways. After all, deviations from optimal throughput would have a direct impact on the operator’s bottom line. Private operators also could in turn offer incentives to trucking businesses, by offering to reduce toll charges if they use tires and axle loads (by efficient distribution of freight loads in the hold, for example, or even longer trucks with more axles) that will reduce damage to road surfaces. In case of strong government intervention, these advantages would be diminished for the dilution of direct responsibility also would reduce the incentive to minimize damage to the highway system.

    With government intervention or not, in the long run toll roads won’t be a sufficient solution to traffic congestion, let alone road damage. As already mentioned above, the amount of freight transportation is increasing rapidly and the proposed toll roads for trucks would accelerate he process. Trucking firms may oppose them now, but as soon as they realize just how advantageous special toll roads are for them, they will feel encouraged to buy even more trucks than they would have anyhow. In response to this, the highway system and especially the toll roads can be extended some more, but there are obvious limits, such as bottlenecks where additional roads cannot be build or the NIMBY factor preventing any construction at all. At some point, road tolls will have to be charged not just to finance the construction and mending of roads, but also to allocate traffic to less frequented roads, preferably via an electronic traffic control system that can react flexibly to changing traffic patterns and congestion. This especially goes for Europe, where relatively little room is left for additional roads, and the widening of bottlenecks frequently involves digging tunnels that are five or more miles long. Capacity already is scarce enough that congestion in one country will make itself felt in several more, especially if a major road artery is involved.

    Even given maximum possible extent of the highway system and optimum utilization of its capacity, at some point it will become necessary to change the economics of the transport business itself, as well as the basis on which their principals calculate loads. Just-in-time delivery that turns the cargo holds of trucks into rolling inventories saves industry a lot of money and increases flexibility, but it also puts serious costs and burdens onto the general public. If those were even just partially priced into the tolls for trucks, it would pay to add storage holds to production facilities and cut back on the number of trucks put to use. Freights also will need to be shifted to other means of transportation, such as trains and also ships, where navigable rivers make it practicable.

    There is no panacea, though. Rail systems also suffers from damage that increases in the fourth power as axle loads increase. Additionally, marshaling yards take up a lot of acreage and won’t be all that popular with the neighbors, so the NIMBY factor also applies here.

    So far with this post. In some follow-up posts I’ll address congestion caused by passenger cars and what to do about it. I also have some ideas I’d like to flog on how new technologies and free-market approaches might help to defuse existing problems and minimize future ones. Like I wrote above, I’ll gladly address any feedback I get.

     

    16 Responses to “Trucks, road damage and road tolls”

    1. david foster Says:

      The freight rail business has actually been doing pretty well in the United States: rail is a particularly good fit to imports, with the containers offloaded from ship to train at the port and then to truck at a point relatively near the destination. For inbound parts & materials used in manufacturing, one inhibitor to rail is, as you suggest, the emphasis on the lean/just-in-time approach. (Nearby location of suppliers, of course, is an alternative that reduces the demand for transportation of *whatever* mode.)

      Here’s a post on a new company that is working to recapture share for rail in the long-haul shipment of fruits and vegetables.

    2. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Thanks, David. The boom in ethanol production in the US also has been very good for your railway companies.

    3. david foster Says:

      One other thought re rail: there was recently a WSJ article on the extreme difficulty of expanding seaports in Europe, due to the various environmental, historical-site, and general NIMBY restrictions…the article suggested that this trend will bottleneck European exports from China and other Far Eastern countries.

      A little research indicated that there is in fact freight rail service from China to Europe at present, and there are apparently a couple of projects being considered for greatly enhanced capacity on various alternative routes. Seems to me this could be pretty signficant in several ways, including economic development in China in regions that are currently being bypassed. I wonder, though, if the European rail freight infrastructure is robust enough to handle greatly increased traffic…my perception is that the answer is “no” and the Euro rail development has focused perhaps too exclusively on the passenger segment—although river and canal freight does handle some of the kinds of traffic that would go by rail in the US.

    4. Don Hodges Says:

      Florida is breaking out in a pox (or flowering if you prefer) of public/private toll road authorities, with the usual patronage appointments of commissioners, insider consulting firms awarded the planning work, and land developers pushing the alignments around to make their swamplands more accessible. It is utopian to think that a road in the U.S. is built in response to a rational plan or even a need. Is it better than just letting the public agencies muddle on? Too soon to tell – check back in 50 years…

    5. Jack Coupal Says:

      I remember many years ago the semis bearing a sign on back saying “This vehicle pays $XXXXX. in taxes yearly”, when people were worried about the damage to road surfaces caused by heavy trucks.

      At the time, I thought the claim was probably true, but that the annual damage to road surface and roadbed from the heavier vehicle was probably many times that amount. As the above post says, the taxpayer foots that extra cost.

    6. Brett Bellmore Says:

      I realize this is probably too sensible to be implemented, but wouldn’t the simplest answer be to instrument representative sections of pavement with strain gauges, and in a system similar to red light cameras, fine any vehicle which created excessive pavement loading?

    7. david foster Says:

      Ralf, here are a few things that might be relevant. There seems to be considerable interest in Europe in making more use of river/canal transport…here’s a piece specifically on the potential of the Danube.

      Also, here’s an interesting document on transportation planning for the Appalachian region in the US–this link is to a page focusing on container-on-barge, but the page contains a link to a PDF with the overall planning document.

    8. wogie1 Says:

      Quite correct, heavy truck fuel taxes do not cover the damage they cause to highways (less than 80%). Passenger vehicles and pickup truck fuel taxes cross subsidize the heavy trucks. The increased interest in toll roads is driven by the outlook that the feder highway trust fund is expected to be insolvent about 2011 (taxes haven’t been raised since 1992). Some private investment concerns will have to be considered in policy-making in this area, in my view. That is, assurances will be needed that a parallel public road will not be built to compete with the toll road project. For example, a tollroad from riverside to Newport Beach area went bankrupt when capacity on the parallel highway was expande. The Chicago Skyway toll road was another example where it went bust and the City took it over (It has recently again been privatized, though).

    9. aaron Says:

      It’s often blamed on the whether, but Michigan is famous for it’s deteriorated roads. Our weather is not worse than Chicago. A big problem is poor construction/planning and generally acceptance of MASSIVE overloading, which in addition to the damage, takes a massive toll on traffic. There are often several trucks at interesections that can barely crawl to a start during rush hours!

      As for passanger cars, I have some posts. Comments are good too.

      For commercial, I think Ford is doing some good stuff. Using GPS and computers to provide advice on good driving habbits. Provides target speeds to avoid stops etc.

    10. aaron Says:

      I love this topic and wouldn’t mind getting involved in a conversation.

      Also, on surface streets, I generally say that speeding is bad. However, the timing of lights has gotten bad in our area. Going down Mound rd at the speedlimit will now cause you to hit almost every light. You actually need to go 51mph instead of 45. So having a good light synching program is very important.

    11. aaron Says:

      Commercial app in Virginia/DC

    12. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Brett,

      that would be too complicated and costly, I think.

    13. Ralf Goergens Says:

      David and others, thanks, I’ll take those points into consideration for my follow-up posts.

    14. aaron Says:

      Ralf, I just added a comment on my site, which I turned into a post, that should help explain why accelerating near peak torque is generally better.

      Why Peak Torque

    15. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Thanks AAron, I’ll take a look

    16. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Sorry, Aaron ;)