Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Pirates and Insurance Blackmail

    Posted by James R. Rummel on October 29th, 2008 (All posts by )

    I have previously discussed how effective measures to combat modern day piracy on the high seas won’t come about until the insurance costs get too high. Piracy will continue until the the increase in insurance premiums for getting attacked by pirates exceeds the amount the underwriters will charge if armed guards are placed on board.

    This recent post at StrategyPage.com pretty much says the same thing. NATO warships might be tasked with anti-pirate patrol, but they won’t actually shoot anyone for fear of bad press. The pirates know they have a good thing going, and there will be more attacks in the future. The shipping companies aren’t about to place armed guards on board their vessels since the higher premiums they have to pay for pirate insurance is less than what the underwriters will charge for having private troops on the vessels.

    I figure one of two things will happen.

    The gangs will continue to raid enough ships for them to have a big (in Somalian terms) payday through ransom money, but not enough for it to make sense to actually attack the outlaws. It will be the same-old, same-old for years to come.

    More pirate gangs will form to grab a slice of the pie. Either the number of attacked ships passes an economic tipping point, or some undisciplined criminals start slaughtering innocent crew members that they have taken hostage. Eventually NATO starts to clean house, and the number of pirate attacks are reduced for decades afterwards.

    It looks to me like more of the same-old, same-old is more likely in the foreseeable future.

     

    4 Responses to “Pirates and Insurance Blackmail”

    1. Steve Says:

      James, you are right. It all comes down to money. For the pirates and for those who should be preventing it (the shipping companies).

    2. Shannon Love Says:

      I’m not sure that making such decisions based on economics is such a bad thing, at least short term.

      One might think about the opposite state wherein we respond to all forms of extortion with violence which leads to a state of near constant conflict.

      Paying danegild offends us morally and we know from history that it is not a sustainable policy but I don’t think the private actors have any choice. The law prevents private actors from attacking the pirates (both directly and by liability) so they really only stand to lose by taking action themselves.

      I think the terminal move in this game will come when terrorist camp out in the pirate lands. Somali already has an active Al-Queada presence.

    3. Jim Bennett Says:

      The post-revolutionary US Navy was created to suppress Muslim pirates very similar to the current Somali kind. Owners of US-flag ships should have a reasonable expectation that Navy and Marines will be deployed to protect them against piracy. This would include placing Marine parties on ships transiting the pirate-infested areas.

      Of course US-owned ships are mostly not US-flagged ships. This is because the Jones Act mandates uncompetitive terms for US-flag shipowners; thus, US-flag ships operate almost entirely in economically-protected markets: Mainland-Hawaii, mianland-Puerto Rico, etc. The Jones Act should be reformed to make US-flag ships reasonably competitive in world markets. Providng US military protection to US-flag ships means that the US maritime wage would not have to fall to world maritime wage levels; they would be competitive somewhere in between current and world levels. As for foreign-flagged vessels: when they report an attack, give them the phone number for the Liberian Navy, if there is one.

    4. Robert Schwartz Says:

      Right now there are hundreds of ship owners who are ordering their ships to voyage to Somalia asap. Since the commodities/credit crash began in September, the Baltic Dry Index of ship chartering costs has collapsed to the point where ships cannot pay their own way. Ship breakers in India cannot get credit to buy ships with and their markets for scrap have disappeared as metal prices have plunged.

      My friend George, who went to law school in Brooklyn at night, tells the story of his bankruptcy law class. The prof asked if anyone could name an alternative process to bankruptcy, hoping to hear about state court reciverships and assignments for the benefit of creditors. A student in the back of the class stuck up his hand, and, when called on, said: “A fire.”

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.