Instapundit links to an excellent interview with the great artiste. Here’s a representative sample:
[interviewer]: Did you ask him about his relationship with Juanita in Miami?
[Stone]: God, I don’t remember. There were so many women.
[interviewer]: Juanita is his sister.
[Stone]: Juanita’s his sister? … He seemed to be a very straight-shooter, very kind of shy with women.
[interviewer]: I’ve called him the movie star dictator. Did you get that sense about him?
[Stone]: Totally. I think it would be a mistake to see him as a Ceausescu. I would compare him more to Reagan and Clinton. … They were both tall and had great shoulders, and so does Fidel.
[interviewer]: For the second film, you received permission to see the dissidents [Stone]valdo Paya, Vladimiro Roca, and Elizardo Sanchez. They spoke critically of the government. Obviously, that couldn’t have happened unless permission for them to see you was granted, right? What do you make of Castro allowing that to happen?
[Stone]: I don’t think he was happy with it. I don’t think he wants to be in the same film with Paya. In his mind they are faux dissidents.
[interviewer]: He actually calls them faux dissidents? He called them the so-called dissidents?
[Stone]: Yeah, so-called, right. I was in Soviet Russia for a script in 1983, and I interviewed 20 dissidents in 12 cities. I really got an idea of dissidents that was much rougher than here. These people in Cuba were nothing compared to what I saw in Russia.
[interviewer]: Did you ever think to bring up why he doesn’t hold a presidential election?
[Stone]: I did. He said something to the effect, “We have elections.”
If you’re naive it’s easy to conclude that leftist cultural icons like Stone have some special insight. After all, they seem so confident in their views, and so many people in the press treat them deferentially. But it can take nothing more than a few pointed questions to make clear that a famous maker of politically themed movies is an ignorant fool. What’s remarkable is how seldom journalists ask such questions. But once in a while someone does, and once in a while the interviewee lets his guard down and the celebrity balloon deflates. (I give Stone credit for risking a hostile interview. Famous leftists like Barbra Streisand, who issues proclamations on her web site but otherwise shirks open debate, deserve even less respect.)
7 thoughts on “Oliver Stone, Idiot”
I heartily agree that Oliver Stone is an idiot.
Ha! But then it’s not like there’s much of a choice in deciding how to think about Stone.
You are absolutely right on this. We had a funny example of something similar here in Britain last week when one of the leading lights of the “GWB is an idiot” school of TV opinion formers (Jon Snow of Channel 4 news) went on a celeb version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire and revealed that he didn’t know one of the absolutely key facts of British history (that the Romans built Hadrian’s Wall.)
Stone thinks GWB is a dictator, but Castro is a “father figure.” Sick…
Martin, I’d argue one is not necessarily wrong on Bush or any other contemporary poll because he doesn’t know who built what 2000+ years ago. Knowing who built Hadrian’s Wall is certainly not directly relevant to the GWB debate.
On the other hand, one would expect someone who made a ‘documentary’ on Castro to know the difference between his sister and one of his other relationships…
Nobody could honestly be so suspicious of the JFK assassination and still think Castro hasn’t shown any signs of Stalinism, right? He can’t be THAT dumb, can he? Please tell me he’s just a liar.
Good point, maor. Maybe Stone is a liar, maybe he just doesn’t care about truth, or maybe he’s stupid. Maybe all three explanations apply. He looks bad no matter how you explain his behavior.
Comments are closed.