Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links

  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...

  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • «
    »

    “Who Can Be President of the United States?: Candidate Hillary Clinton and the Problem of Statutory Qualifications”

    Posted by Jonathan on December 29th, 2015 (All posts by )

    Forthcoming from Seth Barrett Tillman.

     

    This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 29th, 2015 at 11:46 am and is filed under History, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    5 Responses to ““Who Can Be President of the United States?: Candidate Hillary Clinton and the Problem of Statutory Qualifications””

    1. Subotai Bahadur Says:
      December 29th, 2015 at 2:30 pm

      Repeating something I posted about this paper elsewhere today:

      This is the entity still referred to archaically as the United States, in the year 2015.

      1) There is no rule of law. “Law” is the enforced desire of those in power. Right now there is one real “party” in power with two wings; the Democrats and the Whigs.

      2) There are no Constitutional limits on the actions of those in power. Over the last generation at an ever increasing rate the Democrats have used the Constitution for toilet paper, and the Whigs under their old title of Republicans have gladly flushed it down the toilet.

      3) Hillary’s viability as a candidate depends on two things. The first is the will of Buraq Hussein Obama, who could cause her to be indicted even if there were not the mountains evidence against her. This turns largely on his intentions vis-a-vis the 22nd Amendment. If he does allow her to be the candidate, the other factor is the will to power of the Left. Which is absolute. The requisite number of votes will be manufactured to ensure her victory.

      4) The Whig branch of the Uniparty will make the second factor in #3 easier because they are mono-manically intent on nominating a candidate who is both guaranteed to continue to promote what the Democrats want and who is simultaneously at open war with what should be their own voter base if they were a separate party.

      Subotai Bahadur

    2. dearieme Says:
      December 29th, 2015 at 3:00 pm

      “Who Can Be President of the United States?” Boris Johnson, Mayor of London. He’s US-born, wildly ambitious, but clever as you like, and almost certainly sane. His crookedness has been confined to trivia. Recruit him before it’s too late.

    3. vxxc2014 Says:
      December 29th, 2015 at 4:10 pm

      You’re correct Subotai but things are much brighter with a leader, yes?

      He’s our weapon of course. Nothing new in history about that.

      She may get in or she may not. It won’t ultimately matter.

      We’ve tasted leadership and it’s addictive. Victory will be crack.

      No we’re not talking our way out of this, but we’re going to make it.

    4. JohnTyler Says:
      January 1st, 2016 at 12:17 pm

      No, Hillary cannot be disqualified to be president, irrespective of any or all crimes she has committed.
      You see, she is a liberal progressive and as we all know, she is above the law, as are ALL liberal progressives. Just look at what happened to Bill Clinton .
      She can commit any crime whatsoever – before becoming president – and it will mean nothing.

      Pretty simple, really.

    5. Michael Hiteshew Says:
      January 1st, 2016 at 12:53 pm

      John Tyler, that’s true, unfortunately.

    «
    »