Of all constitutional systems the English combines the greatest political with the greatest personal liberty. You will accept this on the testimony of foreign writers on politics, to whom for centuries our polity was the model of free institutions. You will not be less likely to accept it after reading the history of the newer constitutions in Europe and in America which have copied many of the leading features of our own, but have not tempered them or adapted them so wisely to their own circumstances that they seem a natural and spontaneous growth, or have not calculated their forces so well as to secure an equable and uniform working. You will further, I think, realise the fact that a national polity is not the creation of a single brain or of a royal commission of brains, but grows with the growth and strengthens with the strength of the nation; cannot be changed without changing much of the spirit of the people, and is strong in proportion to the distinctness of its continuity.
Our own English constitution is like many old country houses which have a great history of their own if they could tell it; have been now castles, now abbeys, now manor houses, or farm buildings; in which every room has often changed its destination, and the granary become a dining-room, the chapel a billiard room, and the dairy a bath; about which many little turrets have been run up and tumbled down; some have been battered down by enemies, and some pulled down because they made the chimneys smoke; in which chimneys themselves are a novelty, and drains and hot-water pipes a new development of luxury; in which no one room now answers the purpose for which it was built, but has answered many others and more useful ones that were not contemplated. Such a house is generally beautiful, sometimes a little inconvenient to people whose ideas are bounded by a front door and five square windows, but it has its history, it has seen a great deal of happiness, and would not be what it is unless it had seen and been adapted to many changes.
Well, so the constitution begins with the little farmhold in the Teutonic clearing; it grows up and becomes a feudal manor; it builds a national church and a court of justice, and towers and crenellates its roofs and walls; the church becomes the mother and nurse of liberty, and then liberty takes on itself to reform and remodel the church; the court of justice develops into a parliament; trial by jury grows out of compurgation and ordeal. It retains much that it could do without, and goes without much that might be well added if it were not that the addition would stop the working of some more important part. It will, however, like an old house, also stand a great deal of alteration and adaptation without losing its identity.
Lectures on Early English History, William Stubbs (1906)
Portrait of William Stubbs (c) Bodleian Libraries
8 thoughts on “QOTD, William Stubbs, the English Constitution as an old country house”
“It will, however, like an old house, also stand a great deal of alteration and adaptation without losing its identity.”
Yet there does come a point where the old house is completely gone. My impression is that the English Constitution of 1906 had far more in common with that of 1706 than it does with today.
It they can shed the EU there will be a lot more continuity, a restored continuity.
Hoping it happens …
Unlike most modern states, Britain does not have a codified constitution but an unwritten one formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments and conventions.
I sure hope Lex is right, but it’s been my experience that neighborhoods come to the age where a lot of their systems are not in need of maintenance, but replacement. The challenge then becomes whether the neighbors, or more likely new neighbors have the wherewithal to make the investment in new systems. If so, the neighborhood can retain its patina about a new core. If not, property values decline and a new sort comes to the neighborhood for its affordability, unable to make the investment necessary to keep up the old neighborhood. When this happens, a vicious cycle of property value decline sets in. Leaving the HOA may save a little of the monthly expense, but it doesn’t change the reality of the new neighbors.
I dunno. England does not have a constitution. Magna Carta is as close as you will get.
“England does not have a constitution”. Of course it has a constitution, or rather the UK does; that is in the nature of things. What it doesn’t have is a Constitution.
The US is blessed with both a constitution and a Constitution. I suspect that the former no longer approximates well to the latter.
As sick and sad and sorry as the state of my child-gelding baby-murdering vote-rigging sh*thole of a country is, I can still defend myself with lethal force if need be. I can also organize lawfully with my neighbors in a sheriff’s posse for the defense of my community. The British can no longer do either, even with sticks or knives. As in California, invaders have special rights that citizens no longer possess.
All houses fall into disrepair for lack of maintenance.
Comments are closed.