The French riots: About race, not religion

An interesting article by Martin Walker

… The young blacks refuse to talk to white reporters, turning silently away to spit and talk among themselves.

‘We still have to live here when this is all over,’ muttered Bakil Anelka, who came to France eight years ago from Ivory Coast and works as a cleaner for the Metro. ‘The police will not stay here forever, but the gangs will still be here, back in charge of this district. As soon as I can, I`m moving. I don`t want my kids to grow up here.’

One of the striking features of the two weeks of rage that swept France is that so many of the rioters are black rather than Arab, though North Africans from Algeria and Morocco and Tunisia make up more than two-thirds of the estimated 6 million immigrants, their families included, in France.

The fixed idea that French Muslims would sooner or later rise up to declare Jihad on Secular and Christian French society blinded many observers, including most representatives of the press to the fact that these are race rather than Muslim riots. This is the first article I have read that spells this out this clearly:

…in places where the rioters were ‘beurs,’ as the French Arabs call themselves, Islam and religion seemed to play only a minor role. A tear gas bomb fired into the mosque of Clichy-sous-Bois on the first day of the riots infuriated local Muslims, but there have been no Islamic slogans and no taunts against the French as Christians…

Local Islamic leaders who tried to calm the young mobs have been routinely ignored, as have the fatwas issued by the leading Imams saying rioting and attacks on innocent people are against Islam.

‘It was the people from this congregation who called for calm when the tear gas grenade was fired into our mosque,’ Abdel-Rahman Boubout, the mosque director, told United Press International. ‘This is not about religion, I think. It is about race and discrimination and unemployment and the police, not about Islam.’

In other words, these riots are a lot more similar to the riots in Watts in the 60s, or the one in LA in ’92, rather than the Palestinian intifada. Jonathan’s point that the rioters are keeping the violence below a certain threshold, in order not to provoke a truly drastic response by the French state, certainly remains valid to some extent, but they also have to excercise restraint on behalf of their adult family members, for most rioting happens in the quarters they live in.

The article is worth reading in full, especially for the amazing points about black polygamy in France.

Quote of the Day

The only sense in which OIF would have diminished both the nuclear and chemical weapons threats to America was to the degree in which it succeeded in sending a deterrent signal to states considering supporting terrorist groups. This is the consideration which is not only explicitly missing from the pre-war intelligence estimates but largely absent from the subsequent discussion about whether “Bush lied and people died”. The strange omission of geopolitical goals from the story of OIF will continue to have unfortunate results, because the measure of the war’s success or failure never lay in its ability to neutralize atom bomb manufacturing facilities — those are by all accounts operating day and night in North Korea — but the degree to which it has deterred ‘rogue states’ from sponsoring terrorist organizations.

Wretchard

Pulling Out of Iraq

On Tuesday, the Senate passed a resolution calling for regular reports and pushing for a handover to Iraqi primacy. The vote was 79-19. The argument on the right was that this would send a terrible signal to Iraq that we’re going to cut and run. On Thursday Rep. Murtha proposed immediate withdrawal. On Friday, the House voted on an immediate withdrawal resolution sponsored by the GOP that was stark in its simplicity “the deployment of United States forces be terminated immediately.” The measure failed 403-3.

Amazingly nobody, not the left or the right, seems to be analyzing this in terms of what this message sends to the people of Iraq. It’s all inside baseball, chickenhawk v cut & run, and US patriotism. Where concerns about what they’ll think in Iraq are brought up at all, it’s about our own troops in Iraq and how they’ll react. This doesn’t scan, not in the least.

What we should be worried about is the guy on the bubble, torn between joining up for the police or the Iraqi army and staying on the sideline. What will he make of these events? Did the Senate action dismay him? Did the House action buoy his spirits? Will the new week see him decide to join the long line of applicants or not? We should deeply care about that. Our chattering classes seem to have abdicated the only real, serious question that matters. Inside baseball, for them, is so much more entertaining.

News From the Front

A friend who is a former Navy pilot and is now a re-mobilized reservist is part of a large email network. He occasionally circulates very interesting things. Below are two long emails from a Marine and an Air Force Forward Air Controller currently in Iraq. Much detail on weapons.

A few points stood out. (1) Many of our modern weapons do not work in Iraqi conditions, and Vietnam and even World War II era weapons are considered superior. (2) The enemy’s infantry tactics are very poor, though their Soviet-era weapons are decent. (3) The enemy’s IEDs are “first rate”. (4) The Iranians are smuggling very effective armor-piercing shaped-charge IEDs into the country. “Each of these is individually machine milled in Iran and sent across the border”. (5) The “Former Regime Elements” are no longer a significant part of the insurgency – it is all Jihadis. (6) The troops believe they are winning, and are outraged by the media’s presentation of the war. (7) The Iranians have heavily infiltrated the Iraqi local government, police forces and the Army in the south. (8) We have far too few troops to block the Iraqi borders with Syria and Iran, hence the insurgency has permanent access to new personnel and arms. (9) Insurgents have no regard for civilian casualties routinely use civilian non-combatants as cover, and use schools, hospitals and especially mosques stage for attacks, cache munitions, etc.

Make of these facts what you will. I am still digesting.

Click for full text of the emails.

Read more