Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Christmas: A Parthian Shot

    Posted by Joseph Fouche on December 25th, 2011 (All posts by )

    This post is an annual Committee of Public Safety Christmas tradition. From Wikipedia c. 2008:

    Before

    Before

    The metamorphosis of Saint Nicholas into the more commercially lucrative Santa Claus, which took several centuries in Europe and America, has recently been re-enacted in the saint’s home town: the city of Demre. This modern Turkish town is built near the ruins of ancient Myra. As St. Nicholas is a very popular Orthodox saint, the city attracts many Russian tourists. A solemn bronze statue of the Saint by the Russian sculptor Gregory Pototsky, donated by the Russian government in 2000, was given a prominent place on the square in front of the medieval church of St. Nicholas. In 2005, mayor Suleyman Topcu had the statue replaced by a red-suited plastic Santa Claus statue, because he wanted the central statue to be more recognizable to visitors from all over the world. Protests from the Russian government against this action were successful only to the extent that the Russian statue was returned, without its original high pedestal, to a corner near the church.

    After

    After

    Alas, poor Russia. So far from God, so close to the North Pole.

     

    15 Responses to “Christmas: A Parthian Shot”

    1. Bill Brandt Says:

      I’m with the Russians on this one. The plastic Santa Claus looks…..tacky.

    2. Tatyana Says:

      What a strange conclusion.

    3. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Alas, poor Russia. So far from God, so close to the North Pole.

      Vladimir Putin reportedly a devout Orthodox Christian, also Russia`s once and future president. ;)

    4. Tatyana Says:

      also Russia`s once and future president. (bold is mine)

      Not so fast, Ralf. The election will be in March, and as the 10K+ meetings that’s going on all over Russia now show (first time in 15 years), there is no inevitability in this matter.

    5. Ralf Goergens Says:

      I am not saying it that will necessariloy be a legitimate election.

    6. Bill Brandt Says:

      Putin is an ex KGB Colonel who was stationed in Dresden I believe. Unless he had a “Road to Damascus” moment I can’t imagine him being a devout Christian…

    7. Tatyana Says:

      Ralf: then he will lose the game anyway, but with a loud bang, not with a whimper (as he could have, with accepting the popular anti-Putin and anti-United Russia party sentiment.) The time of ignoring the people’s will and trying to frighten them with muscle passed. The Army will not participate in a civil war, if that’s his threat.

      Bill, there is no contradiction. Two birds of one feather.

    8. Lexington Green Says:

      “Alas, poor Russia. So far from God, so close to the North Pole.”

      For those who missed the reference:

      “Alas poor Mexico. So far from God, so close to the USA.” — Attributed to Porfirio Diaz.

    9. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Putin`s Christian belif might be a pretense, for Russia has nothing besides nationalism and religion to unite it in any way that approaches the effects of ideology. On the other hand, that is kind of hard to prove.

    10. Bill Brandt Says:

      @Ralf – Of course form a Christian perspective one has to say that only God knows Putin’s heart – but from that perspective one also knows that “a tree is known by its fruit” – not wanting to start a theological discussion but rigging elections is not a good sign from a Christian perspective ;-)

      From a political perspective my trip down the Volga 5-6 years ago was an eye opening experience. I could see why the communists were so antagonistic to the Church – to see the huge number of Churches all over Russia. The Church had/has a huge political influence over the country so perhaps in my cynical mode Putin finds in convenient to say he is a Christian.

      While Peter the Great started changing the Volga to allow ship navigation it was Stalin, and political prisoners, who really finished it. There are – I think – 9 locks between Moscow and St Petersburg.

      It was said for years the bones of those who died – estimated 160,000 – making it would wash up on the shore.

      If 160,000 died one can surmise that easily a million or more built it.

      An old Russian joke was that the waterway was built on one end by those who told jokes about Stalin and on the other end, those who listened to the joke.

      Along one section you can see the steeple of a church that was submerged in the 1930s – still above the water.

    11. TM Lutas Says:

      Putin’s read his Machiavelli, and I think not just The Prince but also his Discourses. He knows that there is something fundamentally broken in Russia and without Orthodoxy, it is unlikely to get fixed anytime soon. All that doesn’t say anything about the sincerity of his belief. It’s merely indicative of his propensity to aid Orthodoxy.

      One thing that we shouldn’t confuse is belief and sainthood. Saints are generally not criminals in a society with just laws. But nobody’s considering Putin a saint, merely a believer. And anybody who thinks that Russia is a society of just laws hasn’t been paying attention. Plenty of princes in Christendom have rigged a vote. That does not make them excommunicant. It makes them sinners. Most christians are sinners.

      So is Putin a sincere believer? I think so. His personal intervention in the unification process of the “Red” and “White” Russian Orthodox Churches has no serious earthly political payoff. His investment in time and prestige into the process does not make sense except if taken as a leader who is a believer and who spotted a way to personally help the Church.

    12. Ralf Goergens Says:

      Bill, TM Lutas makes my point beter than I did.

    13. tyouth Says:

      It applies only tangentially, but I’ve always liked the bit of lyric from the the Rolling Stones tune about a murdering thug; “but when he gets home to his children he’s a family man”. Compartmentalization happens.

    14. Tatyana Says:

      Bill, you asked me for views/info on contemporary Russian political situation – and I said I’d take too much space and time to respond properly. It occurred to me now – why repeat somebody else excellent efforts if they already have an outstanding blog?
      It is my pleasure to refer you to Streetwise Professor and his to-the-point and on-target observations on the subject.

    15. Mitch Says:

      Regarding Putin’s re-election prospects, perhaps another quote from a Latin American statesman is appropriate:

      “Indeed, you won the elections, but I won the count.” — Anastasio Somoza

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.