Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • The Olympics Are In Bed With the Devil

    Posted by Carl from Chicago on November 25th, 2013 (All posts by )

    A recent documentary on the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia is titled “Putin’s Games” and is summarized here. The movie has not been released yet but I intend to see it as soon as it becomes available. According to the web, the movie discusses the 1) bribes that Russia paid to win the games 2) the vast corruption occurring during construction 3) other ill effects of citing siting the games in a sub-tropical climate.

    The documentary interviews a billionaire Russian who fled to the UK after refusing to pay immense bribes during construction:

    “We received explicit threats: ‘You’ll be soaked with blood; drowned in blood,'” he said. “It was very straightforward. We know the history. Russia generally does not care much for human life.”

    As far as bribing Olympic officials to beat Austria in order to get the games originally…

    The money thrown around by the Kremlin to ensure that Russia was awarded the games is also revealed in the film. Karl Schranz, a former Austrian Olympic skiing champion and personal adviser to Mr Putin on bringing the Olympics to Sochi, talks about the big-money lobbying that went into the games – cash that Leonid Tyagetschev, the former head of Russia’s Olympic Committee, said was “practically unlimited.” The money was used to lobby for Sochi and against Salzburg, which was also in the running before, in 2007, the International Olympic Committee to give the games to Russia.

    The Olympic Committees are against the release of this documentary and per the article:

    Such was the displeasure of the International Olympic Committee when it heard of it that it refused to allow the use of the word “Olympic” in the title, or the use of any archived Olympic footage. They also wrote accusing the producers of making a “politically motivated” hatchet-job.

    After rewarding the games to serial human rights violators in China and Russia, how can the Olympics even pretend to have a shred of credibility? It is astounding that they would call a documentary filmmaker who explains how Putin’s Russia is a hotbed of corruption a “hatchet-job”. What did they think would happen when you chose Russia for the winter Olympics? They need to read the biography of Putin by Judah, since this fiasco was all preordained.

    Cross posted at LITGM


    9 Responses to “The Olympics Are In Bed With the Devil”

    1. Xennady Says:

      Corruption around the Olympics?

      I’m shocked, shocked I tell you.

      Old joke from circa 2002, inspired by the Olympics:

      What is the official mascot of the Salt Lake City games?

      The Tickle-my-palm Elmo.

      Ha ha.

    2. Dan from Madison Says:

      I will be interested to see how many of the people who have been threatening boycotts of these Olympics because of Russia’s anti-gay climate actually follow through.

    3. Jason in LA Says:

      Oh they’ll boycott due to the anti-gay climate right until the figure skating commences. But once Dick Button takes to the mic, fuggetaboutit.

    4. pst314 Says:

      The original article can be found in the Telegraph here, which is a more browser-friendly site.

    5. setbit Says:

      *siting, not citing.

      A nitpick, but spelling and grammar mistakes (my own and others’) drive me up the wall.

    6. Bill Brandt Says:

      Guess the Russians made Salt Lake look like amateurs

    7. Carl from Chicago Says:

      Ha ha fixed “siting”

    8. setbit Says:

      Ha ha fixed “siting”

      Thanks, Carl. It won’t end Russian corruption or fix, but we have to start somewhere.

    9. ErisGuy Says:

      “After rewarding the games to serial human rights violators in China and Russia, how can the Olympics even pretend to have a shred of credibility?”

      Fool me once (1936: winter and summer) shame on me; fool me twice (or more) (1940!, 1944!, 1968?, 1980, 1984, 1988?, 2008) is proof of bribery. When was the goal of the Olympics (or for that matter, FIFA) to uplift the masses by well-placed games?

      The Olympics corruption is small compared to FIFA, which is a typical EUropean bureaucracy.

      No doubt the biggest stain on the Olympics were its games held in the epitome of r/c/g oppression: the USA. Not according to me, of course, but I did go to college.

      * * *

      BTW: notice that prior to WW2, the games were scheduled for the Axis powers in 1936, 1940, and 1944 (winter only). Makes one wonder what sort of government EUropean bureaucrats admire.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.