Chicago Boyz

What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?

Recommended Photo Store
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • To Become the ‘Other’

    Posted by Sgt. Mom on February 3rd, 2014 (All posts by )

    I suppose that my thoughts were running this week on the theory and practice of ‘otherizing’ because my work in the Tiny Bidness has brought me full-face with a prime example of how upright good citizens, patriotic as they saw it, were brought by a turn of the political wheel into being accused criminals, brought before a military commission and charged with crimes which – if found guilty of by the tribunal – could have drawn a capital sentence. That the several found guilty of disloyalty to the régime and sentenced to death, imprisonment, exile or a heavy fine did in most cases, escape the worst of it and return to lives of post-war prosperity and respect must have been of cold comfort at the time.

    Texas, in spite of being a slave state and one which seceded and joined the Confederacy was far from having uniform approval among citizens when it came to slavery, secession, or war with the remaining Union. There was even less enthusiasm for the draft instituted after the initial bloody clashes with the Union burned through the first eager volunteers. When the matter of secession was voted on – at the insistence of Governor Sam Houston – there was a substantial majority voting against secession, centered in the German-settled areas in the present-day Hill Country. In the main, the German immigrants who had been recruited by the Mainzer Adelsverein in the mid 1840s or had departed Europe in a hurry after the failure of the 1848 Revolution were also abolitionists. This had not mattered much at first; the Germans were welcomed – many of them prosperous and enterprising, highly-skilled in industry and well-trained in the sciences as well as having an abiding commitment to literature, arts and the matters of the mind. A large number of the German immigrants were also not disposed to favor chattel slavery – or to hold their tongues when the matter came up for public discussion.

    Suspicion of the Germans increased with the outbreak of war, especially when many of those German immigrants living in Gillespie and Kendall Counties appeared disinclined to support the Confederate war effort by volunteering … or to come along quietly when the draft was instituted. The draft demanded that all white males resident between the ages of eighteen to forty-five be conscripted for military service in the Confederate Army. There were exemptions; for elected officials, certain essential occupations, members of local self-defense companies, and for those who owned more than a certain number of slaves. The demand that male citizens who had opposed slavery and secession now be forced to defend it as soldiers was too big an insult to be accepted without resistance. Volunteering for a local militia unit to defend the frontier from Indian raids – and the Hill Country was still a part of the frontier and at a considerable risk with the departure of Federal troops – was an acceptable alternative to many Hill Country settlers. (A previous two-part account of the conditions in the Hill Country is here, and here. My own novel, incorporating much of this local history is here.)

    According to historian Jefferson Morgenthaler, the German settlers were also somewhat naïve, in believing that they could stand aside from the war, once it began. Isolated as they were on the frontier among a community of their own kind, they did not realize how much or how rapidly the political situation changed in Texas once war began. They had earnestly upheld the principle of free speech – but now a frank and free discussion of the South’s military prowess, monetary policy – or policy of any other kind – was suddenly not only beyond the pale of stimulating converse, but a matter which could make you a criminal.

    This is what happened, in the wake of military law being imposed on Gillespie County in the second year of the war. Between June and October of 1862 eleven German settlers – respectable men, good citizens and some of considerable stature in Gillespie, Kerr and Kendall Counties before and after the War – were brought before a military tribunal in San Antonio, on various charges of having failed to support the Confederacy. Two of them, upon expressing willingness to join the Confederate military, were sworn into service on the spot and turned over to the local military commander. The tribunal satisfied itself that another had been accused wholly out of malice and released him. Three more had neither testimony nor proof of any wrong-doing against them; the commission noting for the record of one (and possibly in some exasperation at having their time wasted) that “the accused …was found to be an ignorant man, and therefore discharged from custody…”

    The remaining five were another kettle of fish. First on the military commissions docket was one Julius Schlickum, who kept a general store in Boerne, north of San Antonio on the edge of the Hill Country. If anything, Julius Schlickum was a political moderate, urging discretion and care in pursuing the interests of the German community when it came to abolition. He was an elected justice of the peace in Kendall County, well-thought of by all who knew him; even the witnesses called to testify could say little worse of him that he seemed particularly skeptical regarding the South’s chances, inclined rather to disbelieve news coming from the Confederacy and more prone to credit reports of Union success. He also was on friendly terms with those who were well-known to have anti-Confederate opinions, and it was rumored had refused payment for goods in Confederate currency. That he was a man of some standing, and had friendly relations with all sorts seemed to be justification enough for the military commission to sentence him to imprisonment for the duration as a disloyal person. As the decision of the court read, “…in his general deportment he is calculated to create discontent and dissatisfaction with the Government and its currency.”

    (To be continued – what happened with the other citizens brought before the military commission in 1862, charged with disloyalty to the Confederacy? Some of them had not the slightest pretense of loyalty, anyway – but those who survived the war returned almost instantly to being honest and respectable citizens. Food for thought, in any case.)


    8 Responses to “To Become the ‘Other’”

    1. Gringo Says:

      When the matter of secession was voted on – at the insistence of Governor Sam Houston – there was a substantial majority voting against, centered in the German-settled areas in the present-day Hill Country.

      Would that not be “substantial minority voting against” secession? What was the vote tally on secession?

    2. Sgt. Mom Says:

      Hi, Gringo – a word added for clarity – but IIRC most of the Hill voted against. I’ll look up the exact figures for the German-dominated communities in Gillespie and Kendall Counties. They were pretty much solidly against, IIRC.

      The ironic thing is – that the Confederacy had established the precedent: don’t like how the election goes, then you can succeed politically. Only somehow when it was a minority wanting to do the same to them? Unspeakable!!! Eleventy!!!!

    3. Michael Kennedy Says:

      “the Germans were welcomed – many of them prosperous and enterprising, highly-skilled in industry and well-trained in the sciences as well as having an abiding commitment to literature, arts and the matters of the mind.”

      Florence Nightingale was very upset to see the “romantic and tolerant Germans” of her acquaintance immersed in the new Prussian state that developed after the 1870 war with France, which France started. Some of those Germans were the ancestors of Chester Nimitiz.

    4. VXXC Says:

      Texas at Secession, Battles and Leaders of The Civil War.

    5. Sgt. Mom Says:

      Yes – Chester’s grand-pop and the guy whom he had especially looked up to, when he was growing up was Charles Henry Nimitz. CH Nimitz was a retired tall-ships sailor – also Ranger company officer and Fredericksburg town father. He had a reputation of being a champion tall-story teller and practical-joker.

      The high honcho of the Pacific War Museum in Fredericksburg has a big reproduction of the portrait of Chester Nimitz as a young cadet with his grandfather on the wall of his office. I know this because I met him once, a couple of years ago. I was coming up to Fredericksburg to do a book club meeting, and the book club president said – “Oh, Mike wants to meet with you. (his wife was a member of the book club.) He can’t get away from work for the meeting, but if you can stop by the Nimitz Foundation office … he’s a retired general, you know.”

      Ok – yeah, retired generals – can’t throw a rock in San Antonio without hitting a retired Air Force general. So, met at the Nimitz Foundation office with Mike, had a lovely time, he cross-examined me pretty closely about certain things in the Adelsverein Trilogy, and afterwards, the Daughter Unit and I went toddling off to the book club meeting. Totally uneventful.

      When I got home that night, I did look up Mike. Oops. Glad I didn’t know about this beforehand – I’d likely been totally paralyzed. (Blondie kept thinking – gosh, I think that name sounds totally familiar, but Mom says Air Force general…)

    6. Bill Brandt Says:

      The ironic thing is – that the Confederacy had established the precedent: don’t like how the election goes, then you can succeed politically. Only somehow when it was a minority wanting to do the same to them? Unspeakable!!! Eleventy!!!!

      That is no small irony…

    7. ErisGuy Says:

      “Fate, it seems, it not without a sense of irony.” People are tribal, not rational, which is why Jim Crow mutated to Affirmative Action, minority set-asides,, and the “sciences” of white supremacy became “studies” departments.

    8. VXXC Says:

      In Client/Patron Political Rule, there’s no room for the 3d wheels called Voters to be makin any real decisions. “We don’t want nobody nobody sent.” = Voters.

      The Confederacy needed only one Vote. After that dey didn’t want nobody dat nobody sent, Suh.

      Which is gonna be the 2016 if not 2014 elections. Ceteris Paribus.

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.