Chicago Boyz

                 
 
 
 
What Are Chicago Boyz Readers Reading?
 

Recommended Photo Store
 
Buy Through Our Amazon Link or Banner to Support This Blog
 
 
 
  •   Enter your email to be notified of new posts:
  •   Problem? Question?
  •   Contact Authors:

  • CB Twitter Feed
  • Lex's Tweets
  • Jonathan's Tweets
  • Blog Posts (RSS 2.0)
  • Blog Posts (Atom 0.3)
  • Incoming Links
  • Recent Comments

    • Loading...
  • Authors

  • Notable Discussions

  • Recent Posts

  • Blogroll

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Quote of the Day

    Posted by Jonathan on April 7th, 2014 (All posts by )

    Seth Mandel: Brendan Eich, the Culture Wars, and the Ground Shifting Beneath Our Feet in Commentary:

    But forget about the Kochs for a moment. Forget, too, about the left’s major donors like Tom Steyer, who plans to spend $100 million in congressional midterm elections in support of Democrats. What about the guy who donated $1,000 to a state ballot initiative six years ago? Should he lose his job somewhere down the line because public opinion has shifted against an old ballot initiative? To the left, the answer is: Absolutely.
     
    This is part of why conservatives have been leery about the Democrats’ proposals to force disclosure of the kind of donors who give to Republicans (while exempting many of their own major donors). The left claims it wants full disclosure of political participation in the name of transparency and electoral integrity. We now know this isn’t remotely true. They want disclosure so they can extend the purge of heretics from private life and thus deter libertarian and conservative political participation. They want a permanent record of everyone’s political opinions to use against them at any time in the future. This is about disenfranchisement and blacklisting and nothing more. That should have been apparent before, but it’s crystal clear now.

     

    4 Responses to “Quote of the Day”

    1. tyouth Says:

      Stalin (or Stalinism) is the model: Don’t give a damn for any justice or morality as long as my group has power and the goodies that come with it.

    2. Grurray Says:

      Gay rights is a red herring. The real purpose of these laws is to solidify government control over our private lives.

      My preference would be that my marriage would never have to be sanctioned by the government. The only reason a gay couple would want theirs to be is to get the government to solve problems it created in the first place.

      If marriage was privatized, this would never be an issue.

      Or give them a tax break or set up some law services to pay for and work out the legal issues of benefits, child custody, power of attorney, etc.
      Extend it to straight couples too while your at it.
      Then to balance things out, give us some relief from the marriage penalty.
      Everybody wins.

      then let’s move on to the issues that actually really matter.

    3. Jonathan Says:

      Grurray,

      Never happen. If problems get solved there’s no more leverage for the control freaks and Stalinists, or opportunities for graft. Unresolved grievances, real or made up, are needed for the system to function.

    4. MikeK Says:

      As Instapundit would say, “Not enough opportunity for graft.”

      It is interesting, and if I were younger it would be frightening, how rapidly this society is moving toward a totalitarian one. This began in 1929 but really got started with Lyndon Johnson who had no concept of moderation as Roosevelt seemed to have. I’m reading Doris Kearns Goodwin’s dual biography od Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, Bully Pulpit.

      Her Progressive sentiments are on full display and almost enough to make me put down the book. The history of Ida Tarbell and the other “muckrakers” is interesting enough to keep me going so far but I can’t guarantee that I can keep going if it gets worse. She obviously idolizes them and her Socialist leanings are obvious. I wonder if she will express and reservations later when we get to the “Wobblies?”

    Leave a Reply

    Comments Policy:  By commenting here you acknowledge that you have read the Chicago Boyz blog Comments Policy, which is posted under the comment entry box below, and agree to its terms.

    A real-time preview of your comment will appear under the comment entry box below.

    Comments Policy

    Chicago Boyz values reader contributions and invites you to comment as long as you accept a few stipulations:

    1) Chicago Boyz authors tend to share a broad outlook on issues but there is no party or company line. Each of us decides what to write and how to respond to comments on his own posts. Occasionally one or another of us will delete a comment as off-topic, excessively rude or otherwise unproductive. You may think that we deleted your comment unjustly, and you may be right, but it is usually best if you can accept it and move on.

    2) If you post a comment and it doesn't show up it was probably blocked by our spam filter. We batch-delete spam comments, typically in the morning. If you email us promptly at we may be able to retrieve and publish your comment.

    3) You may use common HTML tags (italic, bold, etc.). Please use the "href" tag to post long URLs. The spam filter tends to block comments that contain multiple URLs. If you want to post multiple URLs you should either spread them across multiple comments or email us so that we can make sure that your comment gets posted.

    4) This blog is private property. The First Amendment does not apply. We have no obligation to publish your comments, follow your instructions or indulge your arguments. If you are unwilling to operate within these loose constraints you should probably start your own blog and leave us alone.

    5) Comments made on the Chicago Boyz blog are solely the responsibility of the commenter. No comment on any post on Chicago Boyz is to be taken as a statement from or by any contributor to Chicago Boyz, the Chicago Boyz blog, its administrators or owners. Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners, by permitting comments, do not thereby endorse any claim or opinion or statement made by any commenter, nor do they represent that any claim or statement made in any comment is true. Further, Chicago Boyz and its contributors, administrators and owners expressly reject and disclaim any association with any comment which suggests any threat of bodily harm to any person, including without limitation any elected official.

    6) Commenters may not post content that infringes intellectual property rights. Comments that violate this rule are subject to deletion or editing to remove the infringing content. Commenters who repeatedly violate this rule may be banned from further commenting on Chicago Boyz. See our DMCA policy for more information.